Literature DB >> 27050140

[Minimum Caseload Requirements and In-hospital Mortality: Observational Study using Nationwide Hospital Discharge Data from 2006 to 2013].

U Nimptsch1, D Peschke2, T Mansky1.   

Abstract

Background: In order to improve hospital care, minimum caseload requirements for certain elective hospital treatments have been defined by law in Germany. This study analyses retrospectively if adherence to this regulation is associated with the outcome of hospital treatment. Differences in in-hospital mortality were analyzed for complex esophageal and pancreatic surgery, liver and kidney transplantation, stem cell transplantation and total knee replacement.
Methods: Within individual inpatient data of the nationwide German hospital discharge data (DRG statistics) all inpatient episodes subject to the minimum volume requirements were identified and annual caseloads per hospital were calculated. Inpatient episodes were assigned to 2 groups: Patients treated in hospitals with a caseload equal to or greater than the minimum caseload (≥ MC) and patients treated in hospitals with a caseload below the minimum caseload (< MC). Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted in-hospital mortality.
Results: In total, 28 931 esophageal surgeries, 78 879 pancreatic surgeries, 7 984 liver transplantations, 21 773 kidney transplantations, 51 064 stem cell transplantations and 1 093 296 total knee replacements were analyzed. Adjusted in-hospital mortality in hospitals with a caseload≥MC was significantly lower than in hospitals with a caseload<MC for esophageal surgery (9.2% [95% KI 8.8-9,6] vs. 12.1% [11.4-12.9]), pancreatic surgery (8.6% [8.3-8.8] vs. 11.8% [11.2-12.5]), kidney transplantation (1.7% [1.4-1.8] vs. 3.3% [2.1-5.0]) and total knee replacement (0.13% [0.12-0.14] vs. 0.18% [0.14-0.23]). For liver transplantation, no significant difference in adjusted mortality was found (15.5% [14.7-16.5] vs. 15.9% [12.9-19.3]). For stem cell transplantation mortality in hospitals with a caseload≥MC was significantly higher than in hospital with a caseload<MC (6.0% [5.7-6.2] vs. 4.0% [3.2-4.9]).
Conclusion: For 4 of the 6 studied treatments, a significantly lower risk of in-hospital death was observed in hospitals that adhere to the minimum caseload requirement. This implies that, for those treatments, full implementation of the minimum caseload regulation could improve the quality of hospital care in Germany. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27050140     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-100731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  16 in total

1.  [Does hospital volume correlate with surgical process time? : Retrospective analysis of the five most common procedures for visceral surgery, trauma and orthopedic surgery and gynecology/obstetrics from the benchmarking program of the Berufsverband Deutscher Anästhesisten (BDA), Berufsverband Deutscher Chirurgen (BDC) and Verband für OP-Management (VOPM)].

Authors:  O Karaca; M Bauer; C Taube; T Auhuber; M Schuster
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Economic aspects of oncological esophageal surgery : Centralization is essential].

Authors:  N von Dercks; I Gockel; M Mehdorn; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hartwig Bauer; Kim C Honselmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

Review 4.  Dimensions of Quality and Their Increasing Relevance for Visceral Medicine in Germany.

Authors:  Wolfram Keßler; Claus-Dieter Heidecke
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30

Review 5.  Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Jens Höppner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 6.  [Quality indicators for pancreatic surgery : Scientific derivation and clinical relevance].

Authors:  U F Wellner; R Grützmann; T Keck; N Nüssler; H E Witzigmann; H-J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Mortality factors in pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. How important is the hospital volume?

Authors:  Richard Hunger; Barbara Seliger; Shuji Ogino; Rene Mantke
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 8.  Influence of Hospital Volume Effects and Minimum Caseload Requirements on Quality of Care in Pancreatic Surgery in Germany.

Authors:  Christian Krautz; Axel Denz; Georg F Weber; Robert Grützmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-30

9.  Beyond volume: hospital-based healthcare technology as a predictor of mortality for cardiovascular patients in Korea.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Kim; Yunhwan Lee; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Hospital volume and mortality for 25 types of inpatient treatment in German hospitals: observational study using complete national data from 2009 to 2014.

Authors:  Ulrike Nimptsch; Thomas Mansky
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.