Literature DB >> 33330823

Effects of volume on outcome in hepatobiliary surgery: a review with guidelines proposal.

Eloisa Franchi1, Matteo Donadon1,2, Guido Torzilli1,2.   

Abstract

The positive relationship between volume and outcome in hepatobiliary surgery has been demonstrated for many years. As for other complex surgical procedures, both improved short- and long-term outcomes have been associated with a higher volume of procedures. However, whether the centralization of complex hepatobiliary procedures makes full sense because it should be associated with higher quality of care, as reported in the literature, precise criteria on what to centralize, where to centralize, and who should be entitled to perform complex procedures are still missing. Indeed, despite the generalized consensus on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, this topic remains very complex because many determinants are involved in such a centralization process, of which some of them cannot be easily controlled. In the context of different health systems worldwide, such as national health systems and private insurance, there are different stakeholders that demand different needs: politicians, patients, surgeons, institutions and medical associations do not always have the same needs. Starting from a review of the literature on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, we will propose some guidelines that, while not data-driven due to low evidence in the literature, will be based on good clinical practice. 2020, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  centralization; hepatobiliary surgery; surgeon volume; volume outcomes

Year:  2020        PMID: 33330823      PMCID: PMC7731256          DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Health Med        ISSN: 2434-9186


  58 in total

1.  Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan F Finks; Nicholas H Osborne; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Reid M Wainess; John A Cowan; Gilbert R Upchurch; James A Knol; Lisa M Colletti
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  The Cost of Failure: Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Rescuing Patients from Major Complications After Liver Resection Using the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Jay J Idrees; Charles W Kimbrough; Brad F Rosinski; Carl Schmidt; Mary E Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Fabio Bagante; Katiuscha Merath; Qinyu Chen; Jordan M Cloyd; E Christopher Ellison; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: a national survey.

Authors:  Luca Aldrighetti; Giulio Belli; Luigi Boni; Umberto Cillo; Giuseppe Ettorre; Luciano De Carlis; Antonio Pinna; Luciano Casciola; Fulvio Calise
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Influence of high- and low-volume liver surgery in gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Thorsten Oliver Goetze; Vittorio Paolucci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; John A Cowan; James A Knol; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-02

8.  Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Gunnar Folprecht; Thomas Gruenberger; Wolf O Bechstein; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Florian Lordick; Jörg T Hartmann; Hauke Lang; Andrea Frilling; Jan Stoehlmacher; Jürgen Weitz; Ralf Konopke; Christian Stroszczynski; Torsten Liersch; Detlev Ockert; Thomas Herrmann; Eray Goekkurt; Fabio Parisi; Claus-Henning Köhne
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Yasuji Seyama; Norihiro Kokudo; Atsushi Maema; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Keiji Sano; Tadatoshi Takayama; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-11

10.  The combined effects of hospital and surgeon volume on short-term survival after hepatic resection in a population-based study.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chang; Wen-Yao Yin; Chang-Kao Wei; Cheng-Hung Lee; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  5-year recurrence prediction after hepatocellular carcinoma resection: deep learning vs. Cox regression models.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-The Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Jhi-Joung Wang; Ding-Ping Sun; Hao-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.942

2.  A Hub and Spoke Learning Program in Bariatric Surgery in a Small Region of Italy.

Authors:  Antonio Buondonno; Pasquale Avella; Micaela Cappuccio; Andrea Scacchi; Roberto Vaschetti; Giancarlo Di Marzo; Pietro Maida; Claudio Luciani; Bruno Amato; Maria Chiara Brunese; Daniela Esposito; Lucio Selvaggi; Germano Guerra; Aldo Rocca
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.