Literature DB >> 25188264

Identification of patients with postoperative complications who are at risk for failure to rescue.

Victor A Ferraris1, Michael Bolanos2, Jeremiah T Martin2, Angela Mahan2, Sibu P Saha2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: A minority of patients who experience postoperative complications die (failure to rescue). Understanding the preoperative factors that lead to failure to rescue helps surgeons predict and avoid operative mortality.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a mechanism for identifying a high-risk group of patients with postoperative complications who are at a substantially increased risk for failure to rescue. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational study evaluating failure to rescue in patients entered into the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. The large sample of surgical patients included in this study underwent a wide range of operations during a 5-year period in more than 200 acute care hospitals. We examined and identified patients at high risk for failure to rescue using propensity stratification. We also developed a risk-scoring system that allowed preoperative identification of patients at the highest risk for failure to rescue. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk-scoring system that predicts failure to rescue.
RESULTS: Of the 1,956,002 database patients, there were 207,236 patients who developed serious postoperative complications. Deaths occurred in 21,731 patients with serious complications (10.5% failure to rescue). Stratification of patients into quintiles, according to their propensity for developing serious complications, found that 90% of operative deaths occurred in the highest-risk quintile, usually within a week of developing the initial complication. A risk-scoring system for failure to rescue, based on regression-derived variable odds ratios, predicted patients in the highest-risk quintile with good predictive accuracy. Only 31.8% of failure-to-rescue patients had a single postoperative complication. Perioperative deaths increased exponentially as the number of complications per patient increased. Patients with complications who had surgical residents involved in their care had reduced rates of failure to rescue compared with patients without resident involvement. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Twenty percent of high-risk patients account for 90% of failure to rescue (Pareto principle). More than two-thirds of patients with failure to rescue have multiple complications. On average, a few days elapse before death following a complication. A risk-scoring system based on preoperative variables predicts patients in the highest-risk category of failure to rescue with good accuracy. In high-risk patients who develop complications, our results suggest that early intervention, preferably in a high-level intensive care facility with a surgical training program, offers the best chance to reduce failure-to-rescue rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25188264     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  15 in total

Review 1.  Minimum Volume Standards in Surgery - Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Hartwig Bauer; Kim C Honselmann
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Postoperative Ileus--More than Just Prolonged Length of Stay?

Authors:  Sarah E Tevis; Evie H Carchman; Eugene F Foley; Bruce A Harms; Charles P Heise; Gregory D Kennedy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Procedure-Specific Volume and Nurse-to-Patient Ratio: Implications for Failure to Rescue Patients Following Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Griffin Olsen; Fabio Bagante; Katiuscha Merath; Jay J Idrees; Ozgur Akgul; Jordan Cloyd; Mary Dillhoff; Susan White; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Complications and failure to rescue following laparoscopic or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Ru-Hong Tu; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Involving Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Cornelius A Thiels; Asad J Choudhry; Mohamed D Ray-Zack; Rachel A Lindor; John R Bergquist; Elizabeth B Habermann; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Trajectories and Prognosis of Older Patients Who Have Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation After High-Risk Surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Nabozny; Amber E Barnato; Paul J Rathouz; Jeffrey A Havlena; Amy J Kind; William J Ehlenbach; Qianqian Zhao; Katie Ronk; Maureen A Smith; Caprice C Greenberg; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Functional and Cognitive Decline Among Older Adults After High-risk Surgery.

Authors:  Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Yun Li; Paul Abrahamse; Ana C De Roo; Joceline V Vu; Maria J Silveira; Lona Mody; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Derivation and validation of a preoperative risk model for postoperative mortality (SAMPE model): An approach to care stratification.

Authors:  Luciana Cadore Stefani; Claudia De Souza Gutierrez; Stela Maris de Jezus Castro; Rafael Leal Zimmer; Felipe Polgati Diehl; Leonardo Elman Meyer; Wolnei Caumo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  Martine J M Breteler; Erik Huizinga; Kim van Loon; Luke P H Leenen; Daan A J Dohmen; Cor J Kalkman; Taco J Blokhuis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Predictors of Reoperation and Failure to Rescue in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeanie L Gribben; Nicole Ilonzo; Sean Neifert; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.