Literature DB >> 28555630

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Douglas K Rex1, C Richard Boland2, Jason A Dominitz3, Francis M Giardiello4, David A Johnson5, Tonya Kaltenbach6, Theodore R Levin7, David Lieberman8, Douglas J Robertson9.   

Abstract

This document updates the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force of Colorectal Cancer (MSTF), which represents the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. CRC screening tests are ranked in 3 tiers based on performance features, costs, and practical considerations. The first-tier tests are colonoscopy every 10 years and annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Colonoscopy and FIT are recommended as the cornerstones of screening regardless of how screening is offered. Thus, in a sequential approach based on colonoscopy offered first, FIT should be offered to patients who decline colonoscopy. Colonoscopy and FIT are recommended as tests of choice when multiple options are presented as alternatives. A risk-stratified approach is also appropriate, with FIT screening in populations with an estimated low prevalence of advanced neoplasia and colonoscopy screening in high prevalence populations. The second-tier tests include CT colonography every 5 years, the FIT-fecal DNA test every 3 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years. These tests are appropriate screening tests, but each has disadvantages relative to the tier 1 tests. Because of limited evidence and current obstacles to use, capsule colonoscopy every 5 years is a third-tier test. We suggest that the Septin9 serum assay (Epigenomics, Seattle, Wash) not be used for screening. Screening should begin at age 50 years in average-risk persons, except in African Americans in whom limited evidence supports screening at 45 years. CRC incidence is rising in persons under age 50, and thorough diagnostic evaluation of young persons with suspected colorectal bleeding is recommended. Discontinuation of screening should be considered when persons up to date with screening, who have prior negative screening (particularly colonoscopy), reach age 75 or have <10 years of life expectancy. Persons without prior screening should be considered for screening up to age 85, depending on age and comorbidities. Persons with a family history of CRC or a documented advanced adenoma in a first-degree relative age <60 years or 2 first-degree relatives with these findings at any age are recommended to undergo screening by colonoscopy every 5 years, beginning 10 years before the age at diagnosis of the youngest affected relative or age 40, whichever is earlier. Persons with a single first-degree relative diagnosed at ≥60 years with CRC or an advanced adenoma can be offered average-risk screening options beginning at age 40 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555630     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  148 in total

1.  ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Authors:  Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; M Alikhan; O Cummings; T M Ulbright
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Ann G Zauber; Carolyn M Rutter; Steffie K Naber; V Paul Doria-Rose; Chester Pabiniak; Colden Johanson; Sara E Fischer; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

Review 5.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Obesity and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Bardou; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Sheila Weinmann; Kenneth Adams; Aruna Kamineni; Diana S M Buist; Arlene S Ash; Carolyn M Rutter; V Paul Doria-Rose; Douglas A Corley; Robert T Greenlee; Jessica Chubak; Andrew Williams; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Eric Johnson; Joseph Webster; Kathryn Richert-Boe; Theodore R Levin; Robert H Fletcher; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Steve Halligan; Kate Wooldrage; Edward Dadswell; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Improving compliance to colorectal cancer screening using blood and stool based tests in patients refusing screening colonoscopy in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Adler; Sebastian Geiger; Anne Keil; Harald Bias; Philipp Schatz; Theo deVos; Jens Dhein; Mathias Zimmermann; Rudolf Tauber; Bertram Wiedenmann
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  161 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

2.  Augmenting Colonoscopy using Extended and Directional CycleGAN for Lossy Image Translation.

Authors:  Shawn Mathew; Saad Nadeem; Sruti Kumari; Arie Kaufman
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit       Date:  2020-08-05

3.  Geographic Variation in Overscreening for Colorectal, Cervical, and Breast Cancer Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Moss; Siddhartha Roy; Chan Shen; Joie D Cooper; Robert P Lennon; Eugene J Lengerich; Alan Adelman; William Curry; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-07-01

4.  Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Norah L Crossnohere; Ellen M Janssen; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia M Boyd; Antonio C Wolff; Qian-Li Xue; Jacqueline Massare; Marcela Blinka; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Impact of photodocumentation of caecal intubation on colonoscopy outcomes.

Authors:  Brendan Moran; Rishabh Sehgal; Neil O'Morain; Eoin Slattery; Chris Collins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy versus colonoscopy for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.

Authors:  Cynthia W Ko; V Paul Doria-Rose; Michael J Barrett; Aruna Kamineni; Lindsey Enewold; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Influence of Obesity and Metabolic Abnormalities on the Risk of Developing Colorectal Neoplasia.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Yoon Suk Jung; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Differences in Prevalence of Large Polyps Between Hispanic Americans from Mexican- and Non-Mexican-Predominant States.

Authors:  Danny J Avalos; Marc J Zuckerman; Alok Dwivedi; Christopher Dodoo; Jinendra Satiya; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Predictive value of initial imaging and staging with long-term outcomes in young adults diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeremy R Burt; Jeffrey Waltz; Ashley Ramirez; Andres Abadia; Basel Yacoub; Sydney A Burt; Fiona Tissavirasingham; Madison R Kocher
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-16

10.  How does inflammation drive mutagenesis in colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Chia Wei Hsu; Mark L Sowers; Willie Hsu; Eduardo Eyzaguirre; Suimin Qiu; Celia Chao; Charles P Mouton; Yuri Fofanov; Pomila Singh; Lawrence C Sowers
Journal:  Trends Cancer Res       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.