Literature DB >> 28543102

Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Anja Vogelgesang1, Gerd Hasenfuss1, Claudius Jacobshagen1.   

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequently observed valvular heart disease. During the symptomatic stage, the rate of death increases dramatically, so that a precise diagnostic approach is taken to guide therapeutic options. Of patients with severe AS, 30% to 50% present with low-flow/low-gradient AS (LF/LGAS) status. This review focuses on LF/LGAS and the best diagnostic and therapeutic management in either classic LF/LGAS with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) or paradoxical LF/LGAS with preserved LVEF. Current literature demonstrates that in classic LF/LGAS it is crucial to rule out a pseudo-severe AS, because reduced LVEF may result in an incomplete opening of the valve. This can be done by low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography. Classic LF/LGAS has poor clinical outcomes when managed conservatively; therefore, surgical or interventional aortic valve replacement should be performed. In paradoxical LF/LGAS, the LVEF is preserved (>50%), but impaired filling of the concentric hypertrophied ventricle leads to reduced stroke volume. Therefore, diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in paradoxical LF/LGAS are even more challenging. It is a heterogeneous disease entity, and it is crucial to rule out any diagnostic errors because numerous potential confounders might lead to misdiagnosis. As in classic stenosis, pseudo-severe stenosis must be ruled out as well. Evaluation via multidetector computed tomography or transesophageal echocardiography can help to evaluate the morphologic alterations of the valve (eg, calcification). Further studies are necessary to understand this disease entity and to evaluate the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach for these patients.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical Trials; General Clinical Cardiology/Adult; Heart Failure/Cardiac Transplantation/Cardiomyopathy/Myocarditis; Valvular Heart Disease

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28543102      PMCID: PMC6490551          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  36 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Anumeha Tandon; Paul A Grayburn
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-02

Review 2.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Robert A Guyton; Patrick T O'Gara; Carlos E Ruiz; Nikolaos J Skubas; Paul Sorajja; Thoralf M Sundt; James D Thomas; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Mark A Creager; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Robert A Guyton; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; William G Stevenson; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Julien Magne; Erwan Donal; Laurent Davin; Kim O'Connor; Monica Rosca; Catherine Szymanski; Bernard Cosyns; Luc A Piérard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  TAVI for low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved or reduced ejection fraction: a subgroup analysis from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).

Authors:  Alexander Lauten; Hans R Figulla; Helge Möllmann; David Holzhey; Joachim Kötting; Andreas Beckmann; Christof Veit; Jochen Cremer; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Rüdiger Lange; Ralf Zahn; Stefan Sack; Gerhard Schuler; Thomas Walther; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Michael Böhm; Gerd Heusch; Thomas Meinertz; Till Neumann; Armin Welz; Friedrich W Mohr; Christian W Hamm
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.534

5.  Comparison of outcome of higher versus lower transvalvular gradients in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low (<40%) left ventricular ejection fraction.

Authors:  Itsik Ben-Dor; Gabriel Maluenda; Getachew D Iyasu; Ana Laynez-Carnicero; Camille Hauville; Rebecca Torguson; Petros Okubagzi; Zhenyi Xue; Steven A Goldstein; Joseph Lindsay; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Low-gradient, low-flow severe aortic stenosis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: characteristics, outcome, and implications for surgery.

Authors:  Christophe Tribouilloy; Dan Rusinaru; Sylvestre Maréchaux; Anne-Laure Castel; Nicolas Debry; Julien Maizel; Romuald Mentaverri; Said Kamel; Michel Slama; Franck Lévy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Natural history of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Frédéric Maes; Jamila Boulif; Sophie Piérard; Christophe de Meester; Julie Melchior; Bernhard Gerber; David Vancraeynest; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; Siham Lazam; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Inconsistencies of echocardiographic criteria for the grading of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Jan Minners; Martin Allgeier; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Rolf-Peter Kienzle; Franz-Josef Neumann; Nikolaus Jander
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.

Authors:  Zeineb Hachicha; Jean G Dumesnil; Peter Bogaty; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis.

Authors:  Howard C Herrmann; Philippe Pibarot; Irene Hueter; Zachary M Gertz; William J Stewart; Samir Kapadia; E Murat Tuzcu; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod Thourani; Wilson Y Szeto; Joseph E Bavaria; Susheel Kodali; Rebecca T Hahn; Mathew Williams; D Craig Miller; Pamela S Douglas; Martin B Leon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Anja Vogelgesang; Gerd Hasenfuss; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  [Diagnosis and treatment of aortic valve stenosis].

Authors:  A Vogelgesang; G Hasenfuß; C Jacobshagen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Usefulness of Three-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiographic Planimetry in a 4-Month-Old Infant with Comorbid Aortic Stenosis and Coarctation of the Aorta Complicated with Low Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Junpei Kawamura; Kentaro Ueno; Yoshihiro Takahashi; Naohiro Shiokawa; Daisuke Hazeki; Yasuhiro Okamoto
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2022-07-02

Review 4.  Patient survival in severe low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis after aortic valve replacement or conservative management.

Authors:  Linda R Micali; Salma Algargoosh; Orlando Parise; Gianmarco Parise; Francesco Matteucci; Monique de Jong; Amalia Ioanna Moula; Cecilia Tetta; Sandro Gelsomino
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.