Literature DB >> 23661722

Predictors of mortality and outcomes of therapy in low-flow severe aortic stenosis: a Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial analysis.

Howard C Herrmann1, Philippe Pibarot, Irene Hueter, Zachary M Gertz, William J Stewart, Samir Kapadia, E Murat Tuzcu, Vasilis Babaliaros, Vinod Thourani, Wilson Y Szeto, Joseph E Bavaria, Susheel Kodali, Rebecca T Hahn, Mathew Williams, D Craig Miller, Pamela S Douglas, Martin B Leon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis and treatment of patients with low-flow (LF) severe aortic stenosis are controversial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves (PARTNER) trial randomized patients with severe aortic stenosis to medical management versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR; inoperable cohort) and surgical aortic valve replacement versus TAVR (high-risk cohort). Among 971 patients with evaluable echocardiograms (92%), LF (stroke volume index ≤35 mL/m(2)) was observed in 530 (55%); LF and low ejection fraction (<50%) in 225 (23%); and LF, low ejection fraction, and low mean gradient (<40 mm Hg) in 147 (15%). Two-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with LF compared with those with normal stroke volume index (47% versus 34%; hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.89; P=0.006). In the inoperable cohort, patients with LF had higher mortality than those with normal flow, but both groups improved with TAVR (46% versus 76% with LF and 38% versus 53% with normal flow; P<0.001). In the high-risk cohort, there was no difference between TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement. In patients with paradoxical LF and low gradient (preserved ejection fraction), TAVR reduced 1-year mortality from 66% to 35% (hazard ratio, 0.38; P=0.02). LF was an independent predictor of mortality in all patient cohorts (hazard ratio, ≈1.5), whereas ejection fraction and gradient were not.
CONCLUSIONS: LF is common in severe aortic stenosis and independently predicts mortality. Survival is improved with TAVR compared with medical management and similar with TAVR and surgical aortic valve replacement. A measure of flow (stroke volume index) should be included in the evaluation and therapeutic decision making of patients with severe aortic stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov. Unique identifier: NCT0053089.4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; blood flow velocity; heart valves

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23661722     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  72 in total

1.  Predictors for non-delayed discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: utility of echocardiographic parameters.

Authors:  Tomoo Nagai; Hitomi Horinouchi; Yohei Ohno; Tsutomu Murakami; Katsuaki Sakai; Gaku Nakazawa; Koichiro Yoshioka; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comprehensive Review and Present Status.

Authors:  Sameer Arora; Jacob A Misenheimer; Radhakrishnan Ramaraj
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 3.  Challenges in Aortic Valve Stenosis: Low-Flow States Diagnosis, Management, and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; Todd L Kiefer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Transcatheter valve interventions in heart failure: new answers to old questions.

Authors:  Marijana Tadic; Cesare Cuspidi
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Aortic balloon valvuloplasty before transcatheter valve replacement in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Cardiac catheterization and echocardiographic hemodynamic study.

Authors:  V Kamperidis; S Hadjimiltiades; S A Mouratoglou; A Ziakas; G Sianos; A Sarafidou; I Ventoulis; G Kazinakis; G Giannakoulas; G K Efthimiadis; G Parcharidis; H Karvounis
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction: clinical characteristics and predictors of survival.

Authors:  Mackram F Eleid; Paul Sorajja; Hector I Michelena; Joseph F Malouf; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  The role of echocardiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Toshinari Onishi; Kaoruko Sengoku; Yasuhiro Ichibori; Isamu Mizote; Koichi Maeda; Toru Kuratani; Yoshiki Sawa; Yasushi Sakata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-02

8.  Prognostic Value of Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in TAVR Patients With Low-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Balaji Tamarappoo; Donghee Han; Jeffrey Tyler; Tarun Chakravarty; Yuka Otaki; Robert Miller; Evann Eisenberg; Siddharth Singh; Takahiro Shiota; Robert Siegel; Jasminka Stegic; Tracy Salseth; Wen Cheng; Damini Dey; Louise Thomson; Daniel Berman; John Friedman; Raj Makkar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of Ejection Fraction and Aortic Valve Gradient on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Suzanne J Baron; Suzanne V Arnold; Howard C Herrmann; David R Holmes; Wilson Y Szeto; Keith B Allen; Adnan K Chhatriwalla; Sreekaanth Vemulapali; Sean O'Brien; Dadi Dai; David J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.