Literature DB >> 24777938

Natural history of paradoxical low-gradient severe aortic stenosis.

Frédéric Maes1, Jamila Boulif1, Sophie Piérard1, Christophe de Meester1, Julie Melchior1, Bernhard Gerber1, David Vancraeynest1, Anne-Catherine Pouleur1, Siham Lazam1, Agnès Pasquet1, Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS; indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) present with low transvalvular gradient despite a normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Presently, there is intense controversy as to the prognostic implications of such findings. Accordingly, the aim of the present work was to compare the natural history of patients with paradoxical low-gradient (PLG) or high-gradient (HG) SAS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We prospectively studied 349 patients with SAS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were categorized into HG-SAS (n=144) and PLG-SAS (n=205) according to mean transvalvular gradient (mean gradient >40 or ≤40 mm Hg). Primary end points were all-cause mortality and echocardiographic disease progression. To evaluate natural history, patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were censored at the time of surgery (n=92). During a median follow-up of 28 months, 148 patients died. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed better survival in PLG-SAS than in HG-SAS, both in the overall population (48% versus 31%; P<0.01) and in the asymptomatic subgroup (59% versus 35%; P<0.02). In asymptomatic patients, Cox analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, left atrial volume, and mean gradient as independent predictors of death. Finally, at last echocardiographic follow-up, PLG-SAS demonstrated significant increases in mean gradient (from 29±6 to 38±11 mm Hg; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that PLG-SAS is a less malignant form of AS compared with HG-SAS, because their spontaneous outcome is better. We further demonstrated that patients with PLG-SAS are en route toward the more severe HG-SAS form, because the majority of them evolve into HG-SAS over time.
© 2014 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; aortic valve replacement; gradient

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777938     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  14 in total

Review 1.  Low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis-Still a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Anja Vogelgesang; Gerd Hasenfuss; Claudius Jacobshagen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

3.  Impact of stroke volume on severe aortic stenosis in patients with normal left ventricular function.

Authors:  Shinya Fukui; Yumi Kakizawa; Kazuma Handa; Tomohiko Sakamoto; Yukitoshi Shirakawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 4.  Severe and Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Management Challenge: Knowing That We Do Not Really Know.

Authors:  Lionel Tastet; Louis Simard; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-05

5.  Low gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Katie M Doucet; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-05

Review 6.  Advanced imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Workup and Management of Patients With Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Marine Clisson; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-05-02

8.  Direct Planimetry of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Area by Simultaneous Biplane Imaging: Challenging the Need for a Circular Assumption of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Shiying Liu; Jessica Churchill; Lanqi Hua; Xin Zeng; Valerie Rhoades; Mayooran Namasivayam; Vinit Baliyan; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Tony Dong; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Jonathan J Passeri; Robert A Levine; Judy Hung
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Jamila Boulif; Alisson Slimani; Siham Lazam; Christophe de Meester; Sophie Piérard; Agnès Pasquet; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; David Vancraeynest; Gébrine El Khoury; Laurent de Kerchove; Bernhard L Gerber; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.