Literature DB >> 28501864

First-Line Support by Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Non-Ischaemic Cardiogenic Shock in the Era of Modern Ventricular Assist Devices.

Corstiaan A den Uil1, Giorgia Galli, Lucia S Jewbali, Kadir Caliskan, Olivier C Manintveld, Jasper J Brugts, Nicolas M van Mieghem, Mattie J Lenzen, Eric Boersma, Alina A Constantinescu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about circulatory support in cardiogenic shock (CS) from other causes than the acute coronary syndrome or after cardiotomy. We evaluated the effects of first-line intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support in this subpopulation of CS patients.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 27 patients with CS from end-stage cardiomyopathy supported firstly by IABP in the years 2011-2016.
RESULTS: At 24 h, lactate decreased from 3.2 (2.1-6.8) to 1.8 (1.2-2.2) mmol/L (p < 0.001). Eighteen patients (67%) defined as IABP responders were successfully bridged to either recovery (n = 7), left ventricular assist device (n = 5), or heart transplantation (n = 6). IABP failed in 9 patients (non-responders, 33%) who either died (n = 7) or needed support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (n = 2). At 24 h of IABP support, urinary output was higher (2,660 [1,835-4,440] vs. 1,200 [649-2,385] mL; p = 0.02) and fluid balance more negative (-1,564 [-2,673 to -1,086] vs. -500 [-930 to +240] mL; p < 0.001) in responders than non-responders. Overall survival at 1 year was 63%.
CONCLUSION: In most patients, first-line support by IABP in end-stage cardiomyopathy is associated with improvement in organ perfusion and clinical stabilisation for at least 24 h allowing time for decision making on next therapies.
© 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; Cardiomyopathy; End-stage heart failure; Intra-aortic balloon pump; Mechanical circulatory support

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28501864      PMCID: PMC5872567          DOI: 10.1159/000471846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiology        ISSN: 0008-6312            Impact factor:   1.869


  23 in total

1.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation as a bridge to heart transplantation does not impair long-term survival.

Authors:  Ola Gjesdal; Einar Gude; Satish Arora; Torbjørn Leivestad; Arne K Andreassen; Lars Gullestad; Lars Aaberge; Harald Brunvand; Thor Edvardsen; Odd R Geiran; Svein Simonsen
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 15.534

2.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2016-12

3.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Johan Lassus; Alessandro Sionis; Lars Køber; Tuukka Tarvasmäki; Jindrich Spinar; John Parissis; Marek Banaszewski; Jose Silva-Cardoso; Valentina Carubelli; Salvatore Di Somma; Heli Tolppanen; Uwe Zeymer; Holger Thiele; Markku S Nieminen; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 15.534

5.  The impact of a failing right heart in patients supported by intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation.

Authors:  Arun Krishnamoorthy; Adam D DeVore; Jie-Lena Sun; Adam S Barnett; Marc D Samsky; Linda K Shaw; Karen Chiswell; Chetan B Patel; Manesh R Patel
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2016-05-26

Review 6.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  The HeartMate Risk Score Identifies Patients With Similar Mortality Risk Across All INTERMACS Profiles in a Large Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Luigi Adamo; Yuanyuan Tang; Michael E Nassif; Eric Novak; Philip G Jones; Shane LaRue; John A Spertus; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 12.035

8.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in decompensated cardiomyopathy patients: bridge to transplantation or assist device.

Authors:  Ieva Norkiene; Donata Ringaitiene; Kestutis Rucinskas; Robertas Samalavicius; Alis Baublys; Saulius Miniauskas; Vytautas Sirvydis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-11-21

9.  Predicting survival in patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular assist devices: the HeartMate II risk score.

Authors:  Jennifer Cowger; Kartik Sundareswaran; Joseph G Rogers; Soon J Park; Francis D Pagani; Geetha Bhat; Brian Jaski; David J Farrar; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Intra-aortic counterpulsation for hemodynamic support in patients with acute ischemic versus non-ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  Philipp Lauten; Wilma Rademacher; Bjoern Goebel; Daniel Kretzschmar; Hans R Figulla; Alexander Lauten; Markus Ferrari
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.022

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  When more is not better-appropriately excluding patients from mechanical circulatory support therapy.

Authors:  Mannu Nayyar; Kevin Michael Donovan; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-01

2.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing: A new numerical model for programming and training in the clinical environment.

Authors:  Claudio De Lazzari; Beatrice De Lazzari; Attilio Iacovoni; Silvia Marconi; Silvia Papa; Massimo Capoccia; Roberto Badagliacca; Carmine Dario Vizza
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Mechanical Support in Early Cardiogenic Shock: What Is the Role of Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation?

Authors:  Jesse R Kimman; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Henrik Endeman; Jasper J Brugts; Alina A Constantinescu; Olivier C Manintveld; Eric A Dubois; Corstiaan A den Uil
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.