Literature DB >> 24011548

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Holger Thiele1, Uwe Zeymer, Franz-Josef Neumann, Miroslaw Ferenc, Hans-Georg Olbrich, Jörg Hausleiter, Antoinette de Waha, Gert Richardt, Marcus Hennersdorf, Klaus Empen, Georg Fuernau, Steffen Desch, Ingo Eitel, Rainer Hambrecht, Bernward Lauer, Michael Böhm, Henning Ebelt, Steffen Schneider, Karl Werdan, Gerhard Schuler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In current international guidelines the recommendation for intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use has been downgraded in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction on the basis of registry data. In the largest randomised trial (IABP-SHOCK II), IABP support did not reduce 30 day mortality compared with control. However, previous trials in cardiogenic shock showed a mortality benefit only at extended follow-up. The present analysis therefore reports 6 and 12 month results.
METHODS: The IABP-SHOCK II trial was a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial. Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction who were undergoing early revascularisation and optimum medical therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to IABP versus control via a central web-based system. The primary efficacy endpoint was 30 day all-cause mortality, but 6 and 12 month follow-up was done in addition to quality-of-life assessment for all survivors with the Euroqol-5D questionnaire. A masked central committee adjudicated clinical outcomes. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00491036.
FINDINGS: Between June 16, 2009, and March 3, 2012, 600 patients were assigned to IABP (n=301) or control (n=299). Of 595 patients completing 12 month follow-up, 155 (52%) of 299 patients in the IABP group and 152 (51%) of 296 patients in the control group had died (relative risk [RR] 1·01, 95% CI 0·86-1·18, p=0·91). There were no significant differences in reinfarction (RR 2·60, 95% CI 0·95-7·10, p=0·05), recurrent revascularisation (0·91, 0·58-1·41, p=0·77), or stroke (1·50, 0·25-8·84, p=1·00). For survivors, quality-of-life measures including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression did not differ significantly between study groups.
INTERPRETATION: In patients undergoing early revascularisation for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, IABP did not reduce 12 month all-cause mortality. FUNDING: German Research Foundation; German Heart Research Foundation; German Cardiac Society; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte; University of Leipzig--Heart Centre; Maquet Cardiopulmonary; Teleflex Medical.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24011548     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  181 in total

1.  ["Bridge to recovery"- implantation of an Impella® CP in infarct-related cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  G Fröhlich; A Pibernik; M Ferrari
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  [Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation. Do we still need it and if so when?].

Authors:  M Russ
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  [Importance of mechanical assist devices in acute circulatory arrest].

Authors:  Markus Wolfgang Ferrari
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10

4.  Long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a single-centre experience over 14 years.

Authors:  Li Xu; Hao Sun; Le-Feng Wang; Xin-Chun Yang; Kui-Bao Li; Da-Peng Zhang; Hong-Shi Wang; Wei-Ming Li
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation and microcirculation in cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an IABP-SHOCK II substudy.

Authors:  Christian Jung; Georg Fuernau; Suzanne de Waha; Ingo Eitel; Steffen Desch; Gerhard Schuler; Hans R Figulla; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Cellular responses to mild heat stress.

Authors:  H G Park; S I Han; S Y Oh; H S Kang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 7.  Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells: a matter of balance.

Authors:  C J G de Almeida; R Linden
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Percutaneous extracorporeal life support for patients in therapy refractory cardiogenic shock: initial results of an interdisciplinary team.

Authors:  Sabina Guenther; Hans D Theiss; Matthias Fischer; Stefan Sattler; Sven Peterss; Frank Born; Maximilian Pichlmaier; Steffen Massberg; Christian Hagl; Nawid Khaladj
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-12-13

9.  Predictors of intra-aortic balloon pump hemodynamic failure in non-acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Steven Hsu; Swetha Kambhampati; Christopher M Sciortino; Stuart D Russell; Steven P Schulman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 10.  A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Alexander G Truesdell; Mitchell A Psotka; Carolyn Rosner; Ramesh Singh; Shashank S Sinha; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 12.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.