Literature DB >> 28500211

Computer use in primary care practices in Canada.

Yvonne Anisimowicz1, Andrea E Bowes2, Ashley E Thompson3, Baukje Miedema4, William E Hogg5, Sabrina T Wong6, Alan Katz7, Fred Burge8, Kris Aubrey-Bassler9, Gregory S Yelland10, Walter P Wodchis11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of computers in primary care practices.
DESIGN: The international Quality and Cost of Primary Care study was conducted in Canada in 2013 and 2014 using a descriptive cross-sectional survey method to collect data from practices across Canada. Participating practices filled out several surveys, one of them being the Family Physician Survey, from which this study collected its data.
SETTING: All 10 Canadian provinces. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 788 family physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A computer use scale measured the extent to which family physicians integrated computers into their practices, with higher scores indicating a greater integration of computer use in practice. Analyses included t tests and 2 tests comparing new and traditional models of primary care on measures of computer use and electronic health record (EHR) use, as well as descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Nearly all (97.5%) physicians reported using a computer in their practices, with moderately high computer use scale scores (mean [SD] score of 5.97 [2.96] out of 9), and many (65.7%) reported using EHRs. Physicians with practices operating under new models of primary care reported incorporating computers into their practices to a greater extent (mean [SD] score of 6.55 [2.64]) than physicians operating under traditional models did (mean [SD] score of 5.33 [3.15]; t726.60 = 5.84; P < .001; Cohen d = 0.42, 95% CI 0.808 to 1.627) and were more likely to report using EHRs (73.8% vs 56.7%; [Formula: see text]; P < .001; odds ratio = 2.15). Overall, there was a statistically significant variability in computer use across provinces.
CONCLUSION: Most family physicians in Canada have incorporated computers into their practices for administrative and scholarly activities; however, EHRs have not been adopted consistently across the country. Physicians with practices operating under the new, more collaborative models of primary care use computers more comprehensively and are more likely to use EHRs than those in practices operating under traditional models of primary care. Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500211      PMCID: PMC5429070     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  19 in total

1.  Financial and work satisfaction: impacts of participation in primary care reform on physicians in ontario.

Authors:  Michael E Green; William Hogg; David Gray; Doug Manuel; Michelle Koller; Sarah Maaten; Yan Zhang; Samuel E D Shortt
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

2.  EMRs and EHRs. Concepts as different as apples and oranges at least deserve separate names.

Authors:  Dave Garets; Mike Davis
Journal:  Healthc Inform       Date:  2005-10

3.  Coordinating care--a perilous journey through the health care system.

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Diane Lorenzetti; Sharon E Straus; Lindsay Sykes; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Patients and technology: improving access to healthcare.

Authors:  Sarah Mansfield
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  2014-12

6.  Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits.

Authors:  John Hsu; Jie Huang; Vicki Fung; Nan Robertson; Holly Jimison; Richard Frankel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Family-centred care delivery: comparing models of primary care service delivery in Ontario.

Authors:  Liesha Mayo-Bruinsma; William Hogg; Monica Taljaard; Simone Dahrouge
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Richard H Glazier; Julie Klein-Geltink; Alexander Kopp; Lyn M Sibley
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  3 in total

1.  Does not compute.

Authors:  Nicholas Pimlott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Extending large-scale electronic health records to Canadian family physicians: Perspectives from a clinical trainer.

Authors:  Gary Viner; Helen Monkman; Andre Kushniruk; Douglas Archibald
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3. 

Authors:  Gary Viner; Helen Monkman; Andre Kushniruk; Douglas Archibald
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.275

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.