OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) by physicians across Canada, provincial incentives, and perceived benefits of and barriers to EMR adoption. DATA SOURCES: Data on EMR adoption in Canada were collected from CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Health Council of Canada, Canada Health Infoway, government websites, regional EMR associations, and health professional association websites. STUDY SELECTION: After removal of duplicate articles, 236 documents were found matching the original search. After using the filter Canada, 12 documents remained. Additional documents were obtained from each province's EMR website and from the Canada Health Infoway website. SYNTHESIS: Since 2006, Canadian EMR adoption rates have increased from about 20% of practitioners to an estimated 62% of practitioners in 2013, with substantial regional disparities ranging from roughly 40% of physicians in New Brunswick and Quebec to more than 75% of physicians in Alberta. Provincial incentives vary widely but appear to have only a weak relationship with the rate of adoption. Many adopters use only a fraction of their software's available functions. User-cited benefits to adoption include time savings, improved record keeping, heightened patient safety, and confidence in retrieved data when EMRs are used efficiently. Barriers to adoption include financial and time constraints, lack of knowledgeable support personnel, and lack of interoperability with hospital and pharmacy systems. CONCLUSION: Canadian physicians remain at the stage of EMR adoption. Progression in EMR use requires experienced, knowledgeable technical support during implementation, and financial support for the transcription of patient data from paper to electronic media. The interoperability of EMR offerings for hospitals, pharmacies, and clinics is the rate-limiting factor in achieving a unified EMR solution for Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) by physicians across Canada, provincial incentives, and perceived benefits of and barriers to EMR adoption. DATA SOURCES: Data on EMR adoption in Canada were collected from CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Health Council of Canada, Canada Health Infoway, government websites, regional EMR associations, and health professional association websites. STUDY SELECTION: After removal of duplicate articles, 236 documents were found matching the original search. After using the filter Canada, 12 documents remained. Additional documents were obtained from each province's EMR website and from the Canada Health Infoway website. SYNTHESIS: Since 2006, Canadian EMR adoption rates have increased from about 20% of practitioners to an estimated 62% of practitioners in 2013, with substantial regional disparities ranging from roughly 40% of physicians in New Brunswick and Quebec to more than 75% of physicians in Alberta. Provincial incentives vary widely but appear to have only a weak relationship with the rate of adoption. Many adopters use only a fraction of their software's available functions. User-cited benefits to adoption include time savings, improved record keeping, heightened patient safety, and confidence in retrieved data when EMRs are used efficiently. Barriers to adoption include financial and time constraints, lack of knowledgeable support personnel, and lack of interoperability with hospital and pharmacy systems. CONCLUSION: Canadian physicians remain at the stage of EMR adoption. Progression in EMR use requires experienced, knowledgeable technical support during implementation, and financial support for the transcription of patient data from paper to electronic media. The interoperability of EMR offerings for hospitals, pharmacies, and clinics is the rate-limiting factor in achieving a unified EMR solution for Canada.
Authors: Yvonne Anisimowicz; Andrea E Bowes; Ashley E Thompson; Baukje Miedema; William E Hogg; Sabrina T Wong; Alan Katz; Fred Burge; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Gregory S Yelland; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Marie-Claude Trudel; Josianne Marsan; Guy Paré; Louis Raymond; Ana Ortiz de Guinea; Éric Maillet; Thomas Micheneau Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Corinne M Hohl; Katherin Badke; Amy Zhao; Maeve E Wickham; Stephanie A Woo; Marco L A Sivilotti; Jeffrey J Perry Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Mohamed A Osman; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Stephanie Thompson; Robin Featherstone; Liza Bialy; Julia Kurzawa; Ikechi G Okpechi; Syed Habib; Soroush Shojai; Kailash Jindal; Scott Klarenbach; Aminu K Bello Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.692