OBJECTIVE: To determine whether models of primary care service delivery differ in their provision of family-centred care (FCC) and to identify practice characteristics associated with FCC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care practices in Ontario (ie, 35 salaried community health centres, 35 fee-for-service practices, 32 capitation-based health service organizations, and 35 blended remuneration family health networks) that belong to 4 models of primary care service delivery. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 137 practices, 363 providers, and 5144 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of FCC in patient and provider surveys were based on the Primary Care Assessment Tool. Statistical analyses were conducted using linear mixed regression models and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Patient-reported FCC scores were high and did not vary significantly by primary care model. Larger panel size in a practice was associated with lower odds of patients reporting FCC. Provider-reported FCC scores were significantly higher in community health centres than in family health networks (P = .035). A larger number of nurse practitioners and clinical services on-site were both associated with higher FCC scores, while scores decreased as the number of family physicians in a practice increased and if practices were more rural. CONCLUSION: Based on provider and patient reports, primary care reform strategies that encourage larger practices and more patients per family physician might compromise the provision of FCC, while strategies that encourage multidisciplinary practices and a range of services might increase FCC.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether models of primary care service delivery differ in their provision of family-centred care (FCC) and to identify practice characteristics associated with FCC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care practices in Ontario (ie, 35 salaried community health centres, 35 fee-for-service practices, 32 capitation-based health service organizations, and 35 blended remuneration family health networks) that belong to 4 models of primary care service delivery. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 137 practices, 363 providers, and 5144 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of FCC in patient and provider surveys were based on the Primary Care Assessment Tool. Statistical analyses were conducted using linear mixed regression models and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS:Patient-reported FCC scores were high and did not vary significantly by primary care model. Larger panel size in a practice was associated with lower odds of patients reporting FCC. Provider-reported FCC scores were significantly higher in community health centres than in family health networks (P = .035). A larger number of nurse practitioners and clinical services on-site were both associated with higher FCC scores, while scores decreased as the number of family physicians in a practice increased and if practices were more rural. CONCLUSION: Based on provider and patient reports, primary care reform strategies that encourage larger practices and more patients per family physician might compromise the provision of FCC, while strategies that encourage multidisciplinary practices and a range of services might increase FCC.
Authors: Zeev N Kain; Alison A Caldwell-Andrews; Linda C Mayes; Megan E Weinberg; Shu-Ming Wang; Jill E MacLaren; Ronald L Blount Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Upali W Jayasinghe; Judy Proudfoot; Chris Holton; Gawaine Powell Davies; Cheryl Amoroso; Tanya Bubner; Justin Beilby; Mark F Harris Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2007-12-23 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Yvonne Anisimowicz; Andrea E Bowes; Ashley E Thompson; Baukje Miedema; William E Hogg; Sabrina T Wong; Alan Katz; Fred Burge; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Gregory S Yelland; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Baukje Miedema; Julie Easley; Ashley E Thompson; Antoine Boivin; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Alan Katz; William E Hogg; Mylaine Breton; Danièle Francoeur; Sabrina T Wong; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Michael F Mayo-Smith; Rebecca A Robbins; Mark Murray; Rachel Weber; Pamela J Bagley; Elaina J Vitale; Neil M Paige Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-04-01