OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of introducing health information technology (HIT) on physician-patient interactions during outpatient visits. DESIGN: This was a longitudinal pre-post study: two months before and one and seven months after introduction of examination room computers. Patient questionnaires (n = 313) after primary care visits with physicians (n = 8) within an integrated delivery system. There were three patient satisfaction domains: (1) satisfaction with visit components, (2) comprehension of the visit, and (3) perceptions of the physician's use of the computer. RESULTS: Patients reported that physicians used computers in 82.3% of visits. Compared with baseline, overall patient satisfaction with visits increased seven months after the introduction of computers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.22), as did satisfaction with physicians' familiarity with patients (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.52), communication about medical issues (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05-2.47), and comprehension of decisions made during the visit (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06-2.50). In contrast, there were no significant changes in patient satisfaction with comprehension of self-care responsibilities, communication about psychosocial issues, or available visit time. Seven months post-introduction, patients were more likely to report that the computer helped the visit run in a more timely manner (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28-2.42) compared with the first month after introduction. There were no other significant changes in patient perceptions of the computer use over time. CONCLUSION: The examination room computers appeared to have positive effects on physician-patient interactions related to medical communication without significant negative effects on other areas such as time available for patient concerns. Further study is needed to better understand HIT use during outpatient visits.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of introducing health information technology (HIT) on physician-patient interactions during outpatient visits. DESIGN: This was a longitudinal pre-post study: two months before and one and seven months after introduction of examination room computers. Patient questionnaires (n = 313) after primary care visits with physicians (n = 8) within an integrated delivery system. There were three patient satisfaction domains: (1) satisfaction with visit components, (2) comprehension of the visit, and (3) perceptions of the physician's use of the computer. RESULTS:Patients reported that physicians used computers in 82.3% of visits. Compared with baseline, overall patient satisfaction with visits increased seven months after the introduction of computers (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-2.22), as did satisfaction with physicians' familiarity with patients (OR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.01-2.52), communication about medical issues (OR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05-2.47), and comprehension of decisions made during the visit (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.06-2.50). In contrast, there were no significant changes in patient satisfaction with comprehension of self-care responsibilities, communication about psychosocial issues, or available visit time. Seven months post-introduction, patients were more likely to report that the computer helped the visit run in a more timely manner (OR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28-2.42) compared with the first month after introduction. There were no other significant changes in patient perceptions of the computer use over time. CONCLUSION: The examination room computers appeared to have positive effects on physician-patient interactions related to medical communication without significant negative effects on other areas such as time available for patient concerns. Further study is needed to better understand HIT use during outpatient visits.
Authors: J G Demakis; C Beauchamp; W L Cull; R Denwood; S A Eisen; R Lofgren; K Nichol; J Woolliscroft; W G Henderson Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-09-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John Hsu; Julie Schmittdiel; Edward Krupat; Terry Stein; David Thom; Bruce Fireman; Joe Selby Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Alexander G Fiks; Evaline A Alessandrini; Christopher B Forrest; Saira Khan; A Russell Localio; Andreas Gerber Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Renée R Shield; Roberta E Goldman; David A Anthony; Nina Wang; Richard J Doyle; Jeffrey Borkan Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jason J Saleem; Mindy E Flanagan; Alissa L Russ; Carmit K McMullen; Leora Elli; Scott A Russell; Katelyn J Bennett; Marianne S Matthias; Shakaib U Rehman; Mark D Schwartz; Richard M Frankel Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Emily Beth Devine; William Hollingworth; Ryan N Hansen; Nathan M Lawless; Jennifer L Wilson-Norton; Diane P Martin; David K Blough; Sean D Sullivan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-11-19 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Richard L Street; Lin Liu; Neil J Farber; Yunan Chen; Alan Calvitti; Nadir Weibel; Mark T Gabuzda; Kristin Bell; Barbara Gray; Steven Rick; Shazia Ashfaq; Zia Agha Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-11-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Yvonne Anisimowicz; Andrea E Bowes; Ashley E Thompson; Baukje Miedema; William E Hogg; Sabrina T Wong; Alan Katz; Fred Burge; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Gregory S Yelland; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 3.275