Literature DB >> 23381120

Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.

Tuomas Leinonen1, R J Scott McCairns, Robert B O'Hara, Juha Merilä.   

Abstract

Comparative studies of the divergence of quantitative traits and neutral molecular markers, known as Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons, provide a means for researchers to distinguish between natural selection and genetic drift as causes of population differentiation in complex polygenic traits. The use of Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons has increased rapidly in the last few years, highlighting the utility of this approach for addressing a wide range of questions that are relevant to evolutionary and ecological genetics. These studies have also provided lessons for the design of future Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons. Methods based on the Q(ST)-F(ST) approach could also be used to analyse various types of 'omics' data in new and revealing ways.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23381120     DOI: 10.1038/nrg3395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN: 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  99 in total

1.  Rapid, local adaptation of zooplankton behavior to changes in predation pressure in the absence of neutral genetic changes.

Authors:  C Cousyn; L De Meester; J K Colbourne; L Brendonck; D Verschuren; F Volckaert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection.

Authors:  Valérie Le Corre; Antoine Kremer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations.

Authors:  Marjorie F Oleksiak; Gary A Churchill; Douglas L Crawford
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Selection for increased cyproconazole tolerance in Mycosphaerella graminicola through local adaptation and in response to host resistance.

Authors:  J Zhan; F L Stefanato; B A McDonald
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.663

5.  Molecular and quantitative genetic divergence among populations of house mice with known evolutionary histories.

Authors:  T J Morgan; M A Evans; T Garland; J G Swallow; P A Carter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  A critical assessment of storytelling: gene ontology categories and the importance of validating genomic scans.

Authors:  Pavlos Pavlidis; Jeffrey D Jensen; Wolfgang Stephan; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection.

Authors:  Stephen R Keller; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 8.  Whither Pst? The approximation of Qst by Pst in evolutionary and conservation biology.

Authors:  J E Brommer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Allen's rule revisited: quantitative genetics of extremity length in the common frog along a latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  J S Alho; G Herczeg; A T Laugen; K Räsänen; A Laurila; J Merilä
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Influence of mutation rate on estimators of genetic differentiation--lessons from Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ilkka Kronholm; Olivier Loudet; Juliette de Meaux
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  114 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Scan for Adaptive Divergence and Association with Population-Specific Covariates.

Authors:  Mathieu Gautier
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolutionary Metabolomics Identifies Substantial Metabolic Divergence between Maize and Its Wild Ancestor, Teosinte.

Authors:  Guanghui Xu; Jingjing Cao; Xufeng Wang; Qiuyue Chen; Weiwei Jin; Zhen Li; Feng Tian
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 3.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Worldwide patterns of human epigenetic variation.

Authors:  Oana Carja; Julia L MacIsaac; Sarah M Mah; Brenna M Henn; Michael S Kobor; Marcus W Feldman; Hunter B Fraser
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  The Effects of Demography and Genetics on the Neutral Distribution of Quantitative Traits.

Authors:  Evan M Koch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Population genomics perspectives on convergent adaptation.

Authors:  Kristin M Lee; Graham Coop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Detecting Adaptive Differentiation in Structured Populations with Genomic Data and Common Gardens.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Jeremy J Berg; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Effects of fragmentation on plant adaptation to urban environments.

Authors:  Jonathan Dubois; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Adaptive evolution in urban ecosystems.

Authors:  Colin M Donihue; Max R Lambert
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.