Literature DB >> 28475545

Effects of Stimulus Duration on Event-Related Potentials Recorded From Cochlear-Implant Users.

Alessandro Presacco1, Hamish Innes-Brown, Matthew J Goupell, Samira Anderson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have investigated the feasibility of using electrophysiology as an objective tool to efficiently map cochlear implants. A pervasive problem when measuring event-related potentials is the need to remove the direct-current (DC) artifact produced by the cochlear implant. Here, we describe how DC artifact removal can corrupt the response waveform and how the appropriate choice of stimulus duration may minimize this corruption.
DESIGN: Event-related potentials were recorded to a synthesized vowel /a/ with a 170- or 400-ms duration.
RESULTS: The P2 response, which occurs between 150 and 250 ms, was corrupted by the DC artifact removal algorithm for a 170-ms stimulus duration but was relatively uncorrupted for a 400-ms stimulus duration.
CONCLUSIONS: To avoid response waveform corruption from DC artifact removal, one should choose a stimulus duration such that the offset of the stimulus does not temporally coincide with the specific peak of interest. While our data have been analyzed with only one specific algorithm, we argue that the length of the stimulus may be a critical factor for any DC artifact removal algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28475545      PMCID: PMC5659925          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  15 in total

1.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Filipa Campos Viola; Maarten De Vos; Jemma Hine; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Bleeck; Julie Eyles; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings.

Authors:  A Schlögl; C Keinrath; D Zimmermann; R Scherer; R Leeb; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Jon K Shallop; Anna Mary Peterson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Rapid bilateral improvement in auditory cortex activity in postlingually deafened adults following cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Pascale Sandmann; Karsten Plotz; Nadine Hauthal; Maarten de Vos; Rüdiger Schönfeld; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children.

Authors:  Julia Louise Wunderlich; Barbara Katherine Cone-Wesson; Robert Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Balancing current levels in children with bilateral cochlear implants using electrophysiological and behavioral measures.

Authors:  Karen A Gordon; Parvaneh Abbasalipour; Blake C Papsin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach.

Authors:  Myles Mc Laughlin; Alejandro Lopez Valdes; Richard B Reilly; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Authors:  L M Friesen; K L Tremblay; N Rohila; R A Wright; R V Shannon; D Başkent; J T Rubinstein
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  2 in total

1.  Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Olga Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-06

2.  Cortical auditory evoked potential in cochlear implant users: An objective method to improve speech perception.

Authors:  Dayse Távora-Vieira; Andre Wedekind; Ellen Ffoulkes; Marcus Voola; Roberta Marino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.