Literature DB >> 22234161

Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials.

Filipa Campos Viola1, Maarten De Vos, Jemma Hine, Pascale Sandmann, Stefan Bleeck, Julie Eyles, Stefan Debener.   

Abstract

Electrical artifacts caused by the cochlear implant (CI) contaminate electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings from implanted individuals and corrupt auditory evoked potentials (AEPs). Independent component analysis (ICA) is efficient in attenuating the electrical CI artifact and AEPs can be successfully reconstructed. However the manual selection of CI artifact related independent components (ICs) obtained with ICA is unsatisfactory, since it contains expert-choices and is time consuming. We developed a new procedure to evaluate temporal and topographical properties of ICs and semi-automatically select those components representing electrical CI artifact. The CI Artifact Correction (CIAC) algorithm was tested on EEG data from two different studies. The first consists of published datasets from 18 CI users listening to environmental sounds. Compared to the manual IC selection performed by an expert the sensitivity of CIAC was 91.7% and the specificity 92.3%. After CIAC-based attenuation of CI artifacts, a high correlation between age and N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude was observed in the AEPs, replicating previously reported findings and further confirming the algorithm's validity. In the second study AEPs in response to pure tone and white noise stimuli from 12 CI users that had also participated in the other study were evaluated. CI artifacts were attenuated based on the IC selection performed semi-automatically by CIAC and manually by one expert. Again, a correlation between N1 amplitude and age was found. Moreover, a high test-retest reliability for AEP N1 amplitudes and latencies suggested that CIAC-based attenuation reliably preserves plausible individual response characteristics. We conclude that CIAC enables the objective and efficient attenuation of the CI artifact in EEG recordings, as it provided a reasonable reconstruction of individual AEPs. The systematic pattern of individual differences in N1 amplitudes and latencies observed with different stimuli at different sessions, strongly suggests that CIAC can overcome the electrical artifact problem. Thus CIAC facilitates the use of cortical AEPs as an objective measurement of auditory rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22234161     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  13 in total

1.  Free-Field Cortical Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Razieh Alemi; Sylvie Nozaradan; Alexandre Lehmann
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Cortical activation patterns to spatially presented pure tone stimuli with different intensities measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Günther Bauernfeind; Selina C Wriessnegger; Sabine Haumann; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Effects of Stimulus Duration on Event-Related Potentials Recorded From Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Hamish Innes-Brown; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Direct recordings from the auditory cortex in a cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Christine P Etler; John F Brugge; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Richard A Reale; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-22

6.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Semantic Processing in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: Large N400 Mismatch Effects in Brain Responses, Despite Poor Semantic Ability.

Authors:  Petter Kallioinen; Jonas Olofsson; Cecilia Nakeva von Mentzer; Magnus Lindgren; Marianne Ors; Birgitta S Sahlén; Björn Lyxell; Elisabet Engström; Inger Uhlén
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-10

8.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico; Deepashri Agrawal; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Source-Modeling Auditory Processes of EEG Data Using EEGLAB and Brainstorm.

Authors:  Maren Stropahl; Anna-Katharina R Bauer; Stefan Debener; Martin G Bleichner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.