Literature DB >> 27021590

Balancing current levels in children with bilateral cochlear implants using electrophysiological and behavioral measures.

Karen A Gordon1, Parvaneh Abbasalipour2, Blake C Papsin3.   

Abstract

Children have benefited from bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) over unilateral CIs despite often missing important periods in bilateral auditory development. This suggests a remarkable perceptual ability by children to "work around" abnormal changes in the auditory pathways. Nonetheless, these children rely primarily on interaural level differences as interaural timing cues are more difficult to access or detect. Mismatched levels provided to the two implants could distort interaural level cues thus compromising the benefits of bilateral CI use. We asked whether "balanced" or "centered" perception of bilateral input can be predicted by physiological or behavioral measures. Twenty-four children who had used unilateral CIs for 9.21 ± 2.66 years prior to bilateral implantation participated. "Balanced bilateral levels" were identified by responses occurring with a probability of 50% on the right side of the head and 50% on the left in a two choice lateralization task. Loudness judgments of current presented unilaterally by each implant were measured on a continuous visual scale. Maximum wave eV amplitudes were evoked unilaterally by each implant and matched amplitudes were identified. Balanced bilateral levels were predicted within 10 Clinical Units (CU) in 9 of 13 (69%) children using matched wave eV amplitudes. Bilaterally balanced levels were reasonably predicted by similar loudness judgments (<10% difference between CIs) in only 6 of 13 (46%) children. Results indicate that matching amplitudes of physiological responses can produce a balanced perception of bilateral input despite unilateral strengthening of the auditory pathways and can potentially be used clinically to provide a first approximation of balance/centered levels.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Bilateral center/balance/symmetry; Deafness; Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response; Interaural level difference; Lateralization; Loudness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021590     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Stimulus Duration on Event-Related Potentials Recorded From Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Hamish Innes-Brown; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Michael Deighton; Blake Papsin; Karen Gordon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cortical imbalance following delayed restoration of bilateral hearing in deaf adolescents.

Authors:  Carly A Anderson; Sharon L Cushing; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 5.399

4.  Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: Developmental advances do not yet achieve normal cortical processing.

Authors:  Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Hiroshi Yamazaki; Michael Deighton; Blake Papsin; Karen Gordon
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part I: Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Jan Wouters; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Dimitar Spirrov; Jan Wouters; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.