Literature DB >> 34231111

Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Zilong Xie1, Olga Stakhovskaya2, Matthew J Goupell2, Samira Anderson2.   

Abstract

Age-related declines in auditory temporal processing contribute to speech understanding difficulties of older adults. These temporal processing deficits have been established primarily among acoustic-hearing listeners, but the peripheral and central contributions are difficult to separate. This study recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from younger to middle-aged (< 65 years) and older (≥ 65 years) cochlear-implant (CI) listeners to assess age-related changes in temporal processing, where cochlear processing is bypassed in this population. Aging effects were compared to age-matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Advancing age was associated with prolonged P2 latencies in both CI and NH listeners in response to a 1000-Hz tone or a syllable /da/, and with prolonged N1 latencies in CI listeners in response to the syllable. Advancing age was associated with larger N1 amplitudes in NH listeners. These age-related changes in latency and amplitude were independent of stimulus presentation rate. Further, CI listeners exhibited prolonged N1 and P2 latencies and smaller P2 amplitudes than NH listeners. Thus, aging appears to degrade some aspects of auditory temporal processing when peripheral-cochlear contributions are largely removed, suggesting that changes beyond the cochlea may contribute to age-related temporal processing deficits.
© 2021. Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; cochlear implant; cortical auditory evoked potential; stimulus presentation rate

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34231111      PMCID: PMC8599602          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-021-00804-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  44 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory stimulus processing at different stimulus intensities as reflected by auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  G Adler; J Adler
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease?

Authors:  Juliana Francisco Cecato; José Eduardo Martinelli; Rafael Izbicki; Mônica Sanches Yassuda; Ivan Aprahamian
Journal:  Int Psychogeriatr       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.878

4.  Acoustic change complexes recorded in adult cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Lendra M Friesen; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; S Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.

Authors:  Ingyu Chun; Curtis J Billings; Christi W Miller; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Age-Related Compensation Mechanism Revealed in the Cortical Representation of Degraded Speech.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsey Roque; Casey R Gaskins; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  J R Dubno; D D Dirks; D E Morgan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Evoked cortical activity and speech recognition as a function of the number of simulated cochlear implant channels.

Authors:  L M Friesen; K L Tremblay; N Rohila; R A Wright; R V Shannon; D Başkent; J T Rubinstein
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stimulus context affects the phonemic categorization of temporally based word contrasts in adult cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural Plasticity Induced by Hearing Aid Use.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 5.702

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.