Literature DB >> 23727626

Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach.

Myles Mc Laughlin1, Alejandro Lopez Valdes, Richard B Reilly, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that late auditory evoked potentials (LAEP) provide a useful objective metric of performance in cochlear implant (CI) subjects. However, the CI produces a large electrical artifact that contaminates LAEP recordings and confounds their interpretation. Independent component analysis (ICA) has been used in combination with multi-channel recordings to effectively remove the artifact. The applicability of the ICA approach is limited when only single channel data are needed or available, as is often the case in both clinical and research settings. Here we developed a single-channel, high sample rate (125 kHz), and high bandwidth (0-100 kHz) acquisition system to reduce the CI stimulation artifact. We identified two different artifacts in the recording: 1) a high frequency artifact reflecting the stimulation pulse rate, and 2) a direct current (DC, or pedestal) artifact that showed a non-linear time varying relationship to pulse amplitude. This relationship was well described by a bivariate polynomial. The high frequency artifact was completely attenuated by a 35 Hz low-pass filter for all subjects (n = 22). The DC artifact could be caused by an impedance mismatch. For 27% of subjects tested, no DC artifact was observed when electrode impedances were balanced to within 1 kΩ. For the remaining 73% of subjects, the pulse amplitude was used to estimate and then attenuate the DC artifact. Where measurements of pulse amplitude were not available (as with standard low sample rate systems), the DC artifact could be estimated from the stimulus envelope. The present artifact removal approach allows accurate measurement of LAEPs from CI subjects from single channel recordings, increasing their feasibility and utility as an accessible objective measure of CI function.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23727626     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in (Un)aided Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults.

Authors:  Bram Van Dun; Anna Kania; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

2.  Effects of Stimulus Duration on Event-Related Potentials Recorded From Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Hamish Innes-Brown; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A potential neurophysiological correlate of electric-acoustic pitch matching in adult cochlear implant users: Pilot data.

Authors:  Chin-Tuan Tan; Brett A Martin; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2018-03-06

4.  Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Peripheral and Central Contributions to Cortical Responses in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for neuroimaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Joe Saliba; Heather Bortfeld; Daniel J Levitin; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cortical Activation Patterns Correlate with Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Cristen Olds; Luca Pollonini; Homer Abaya; Jannine Larky; Megan Loy; Heather Bortfeld; Michael S Beauchamp; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  [Preoperative auditory evaluation and postoperative follow-up in cochlear implantees : The role of objective measures].

Authors:  W Shehata-Dieler; W Großmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Aging Effects on Cortical Responses to Tones and Speech in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Olga Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-06

10.  Objective assessment of spectral ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners using cortical evoked responses to an oddball paradigm.

Authors:  Alejandro Lopez Valdes; Myles Mc Laughlin; Laura Viani; Peter Walshe; Jaclyn Smith; Fan-Gang Zeng; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.