Literature DB >> 25894491

Unexpected dynamic up-tuning of auditory organs in day-flying moths.

Emanuel C Mora1, Ariadna Cobo-Cuan, Frank Macías-Escrivá, Manfred Kössl.   

Abstract

In certain nocturnal moth species the frequency range of best hearing shifts to higher frequencies during repeated sound stimulation. This could provide the moths with a mechanism to better detect approaching echolocating bats. However, such a dynamic up-tuning would be of little value for day-flying moths that use intra-specific acoustic communication. Here we examined if the ears of day-flying moths provide stable tuning during longer sound stimulation. Contrary to our expectations, dynamic up-tuning was found in the ear of the day-flying species Urania boisduvalii and Empyreuma pugione. Audiograms were measured with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The level of the dominant distortion product (i.e. 2f1-f2) varied as a function of time by as much as 45 dB during ongoing acoustic stimulation, showing a systematic decrease at low frequencies and an increase at high frequencies. As a consequence, within about 2 s of acoustic stimulation, the DPOAEs audiogram shifted from low to high frequencies. Despite the up-tuning, the range of best audition still fell within the frequency band of the species-specific communication signals, suggesting that intra-specific communication should not be affected adversely. Up-tuning could be an ancestral condition in moth ears that in day-flying moths does not underlie larger selection pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25894491     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1009-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  29 in total

1.  Ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies.

Authors:  J E Yack; J H Fullard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A multifrequency method for determining cochlear efferent activity.

Authors:  Anne E Luebke; Paul K Foster; Barden B Stagner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

3.  An aerial-hawking bat uses stealth echolocation to counter moth hearing.

Authors:  Holger R Goerlitz; Hannah M ter Hofstede; Matt R K Zeale; Gareth Jones; Marc W Holderied
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Human efferent adaptation of DPOAEs in the L1,L2 space.

Authors:  Deanna K Meinke; Barden B Stagner; Glen K Martin; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  If a bird flies in the forest, does an insect hear it?

Authors:  J P Fournier; J W Dawson; A Mikhail; J E Yack
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 6.  Otoacoustic emissions from insect ears: evidence of active hearing?

Authors:  Manfred Kössl; Doreen Möckel; Melanie Weber; Ernst-August Seyfarth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Mechanical basis of otoacoustic emissions in tympanal hearing organs.

Authors:  Doreen Möckel; Manuela Nowotny; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.

Authors:  D O Kim; P A Dorn; S T Neely; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-03

9.  Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Dennis M Freeman; James C Saunders; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  'Un chant d'appel amoureux': acoustic communication in moths

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  Hearing diversity in moths confronting a neotropical bat assemblage.

Authors:  Ariadna Cobo-Cuan; Manfred Kössl; Emanuel C Mora
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.