Literature DB >> 28402326

Chocolate intake and diabetes risk in postmenopausal American women.

J A Greenberg1, J E Manson2, L Tinker3, M L Neuhouser3, L Garcia4, M Z Vitolins5, L S Phillips6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Recent long-term prospective cohort studies found inverse associations between chocolate consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes, but provided conflicting evidence on the nature of the association among women. To assess this association in a large cohort of American women. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: Multivariable Cox regression was used with the data from 92 678 postmenopausal women in the prospective Women's Health Initiative study. Chocolate intake was assessed by food frequency questionnaire. Incidence of type 2 diabetes was determined by self-report of the first treatment with oral medication or insulin.
RESULTS: Among women free of diabetes at baseline, there were 10 804 cases, representing an incidence rate of 11.7% during 13.1 years and 1 164 498 person-years of follow-up. There was no significant linear association between long-term chocolate intake and type 2 diabetes risk, but there was significantly reduced risk at moderate levels of intake. Compared to women who ate 1 oz. of chocolate <1 time per month, those who ate this amount 1-<1.5 times per month, 1.5-<3.5 times per month, 3.5 times per month to <3 times per week and ⩾3 times per week had hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92, 1.04), 0.92 (0.87, 0.98), 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) and 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) (P for linear trend=0.79). There was only evidence of such inverse associations for women with below-median physical activity (P for interaction <0.0001) and those with age<65 years (P=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: We only found an inverse association between chocolate consumption and type 2 diabetes at moderate levels of consumption in two subgroups of postmenopausal women in the Women's Health initiative cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28402326     DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  20 in total

1.  Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements.

Authors:  F B Hu; M J Stampfer; E Rimm; A Ascherio; B A Rosner; D Spiegelman; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Adjustment for regression dilution in epidemiological regression analyses.

Authors:  M W Knuiman; M L Divitini; J S Buzas; P E Fitzgerald
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  A diet high in low-fat dairy products lowers diabetes risk in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Karen L Margolis; Feifei Wei; Ian H de Boer; Barbara V Howard; Simin Liu; JoAnn E Manson; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Lawrence S Phillips; James M Shikany; Lesley F Tinker
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Trends in lifetime risk and years of life lost due to diabetes in the USA, 1985-2011: a modelling study.

Authors:  Edward W Gregg; Xiaohui Zhuo; Yiling J Cheng; Ann L Albright; K M Venkat Narayan; Theodore J Thompson
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0.

Authors:  R D Hays; C D Sherbourne; R M Mazel
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-02

8.  Short version of the CES-D (Burnam screen) for depression in reference to the structured psychiatric interview.

Authors:  A Tuunainen; R D Langer; M R Klauber; D F Kripke
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2001-09-20       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease.

Authors:  Stephanie E Chiuve; Teresa T Fung; Eric B Rimm; Frank B Hu; Marjorie L McCullough; Molin Wang; Meir J Stampfer; Walter C Willett
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Chocolate consumption and risk of diabetes mellitus in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Chisa Matsumoto; Andrew B Petrone; Howard D Sesso; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  5 in total

1.  What Makes Nutrition Research So Difficult to Conduct and Interpret?

Authors:  Mara Z Vitolins; Talsi L Case
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2020-05

2.  Chocolate consumption and risk of coronary artery disease: the Million Veteran Program.

Authors:  Yuk-Lam Ho; Xuan-Mai T Nguyen; Joseph Q Yan; Jason L Vassy; David R Gagnon; J Michael Gaziano; Peter Wf Wilson; Kelly Cho; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 3.  Effects of Cocoa Antioxidants in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Sonia Ramos; María Angeles Martín; Luis Goya
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-31

4.  Chocolate and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakub Morze; Carolina Schwedhelm; Aleksander Bencic; Georg Hoffmann; Heiner Boeing; Katarzyna Przybylowicz; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.614

5.  Chocolate Consumption and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Sheng Yuan; Xia Li; Yalei Jin; Jinping Lu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.