Literature DB >> 10084242

Dietary fat and coronary heart disease: a comparison of approaches for adjusting for total energy intake and modeling repeated dietary measurements.

F B Hu1, M J Stampfer, E Rimm, A Ascherio, B A Rosner, D Spiegelman, W C Willett.   

Abstract

Previous cohort studies of fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) have been inconsistent, probably due in part to methodological differences and various limitations, including inadequate dietary assessment and incomplete adjustment for total energy intake. The authors analyzed repeated assessment of diet from the Nurses' Health Study to examine the associations between intakes of four major types of fat (saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated, and trans fats) and risk of CHD during 14 years of follow-up (1980-1994) by using alternative methods for energy adjustment. In particular, the authors compared four risk models for energy adjustment: the standard multivariate model, the energy-partition model, the nutrient residual model, and the multivariate nutrient density model. Within each model, the authors compared four different approaches for analyzing repeated dietary measurements: baseline diet only, the most recent diet, and two different algorithms for calculating cumulative average diets. The substantive results were consistent across all models; that is, higher intakes of saturated and trans fats were associated with increased risk of CHD, while higher intakes of monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats were associated with reduced risk. When nutrients were considered as continuous variables, the four energy-adjustment methods yielded similar associationS. However, the interpretation of the relative risks differed across models. In addition, within each model, the methods using the cumulative averages in general yielded stronger associations than did those using either only baseline diet or the most recent diet. When the nutrients were categorized according to quintiles, the residual and the nutrient density models, which gave similar results, yielded statistically more significant tests for linear trend than did the standard and the partition models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084242     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  449 in total

1.  Whole-grain, cereal fiber, bran, and germ intake and the risks of all-cause and cardiovascular disease-specific mortality among women with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Meian He; Rob M van Dam; Eric Rimm; Frank B Hu; Lu Qi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Poorer maternal diet quality and increased birth weight.

Authors:  Madeline Grandy; Jonathan M Snowden; Janne Boone-Heinonen; Jonathan Q Purnell; Kent L Thornburg; Nicole E Marshall
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  Application of the Rosner-Colditz risk prediction model to estimate sexual orientation group disparities in breast cancer risk in a U.S. cohort of premenopausal women.

Authors:  S Bryn Austin; Mathew J Pazaris; Bernard Rosner; Deborah Bowen; Janet Rich-Edwards; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Dairy-food, calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D intake and endometriosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Holly R Harris; Jorge E Chavarro; Susan Malspeis; Walter C Willett; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Regular aspirin use and risk of multiple myeloma: a prospective analysis in the health professionals follow-up study and nurses' health study.

Authors:  Brenda M Birmann; Edward L Giovannucci; Bernard A Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2013-11-26

6.  Urinary Sodium and Potassium Excretion and CKD Progression.

Authors:  Jiang He; Katherine T Mills; Lawrence J Appel; Wei Yang; Jing Chen; Belinda T Lee; Sylvia E Rosas; Anna Porter; Gail Makos; Matthew R Weir; L Lee Hamm; John W Kusek
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Animal origin foods and colorectal cancer risk: a report from the Shanghai Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Lee; Xiao Ou Shu; Gong Yang; Honglan Li; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Association between Diet Quality Scores and Risk of Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Women and Men Aged 50 Years and Older.

Authors:  Teresa T Fung; Haakon E Meyer; Walter C Willett; Diane Feskanich
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.910

9.  High iron intake is associated with poor cognition among Chinese old adults and varied by weight status-a 15-y longitudinal study in 4852 adults.

Authors:  Zumin Shi; Ming Li; Youfa Wang; Jianghong Liu; Tahra El-Obeid
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Changes in coffee intake and subsequent risk of type 2 diabetes: three large cohorts of US men and women.

Authors:  Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; An Pan; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett; Rob M van Dam; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.