PURPOSE: The term "regression dilution" describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for "regression dilution" that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.
PURPOSE: The term "regression dilution" describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for "regression dilution" that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.
Authors: J A Greenberg; J E Manson; L Tinker; M L Neuhouser; L Garcia; M Z Vitolins; L S Phillips Journal: Eur J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Julia J Scialla; Lawrence J Appel; Brad C Astor; Edgar R Miller; Srinivasan Beddhu; Mark Woodward; Rulan S Parekh; Cheryl A M Anderson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Sarah Kozey Keadle; Eric J Shiroma; Masamitsu Kamada; Charles E Matthews; Tamara B Harris; I-Min Lee Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sara L Gale; Elizabeth M Noth; Jennifer Mann; John Balmes; S Katharine Hammond; Ira B Tager Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Paul Muntner; Cara Joyce; Emily B Levitan; Elizabeth Holt; Daichi Shimbo; Larry S Webber; Suzanne Oparil; Richard Re; Marie Krousel-Wood Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Sebhat Erqou; Stephen Kaptoge; Philip L Perry; Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Alexander Thompson; Ian R White; Santica M Marcovina; Rory Collins; Simon G Thompson; John Danesh Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-07-22 Impact factor: 56.272