Literature DB >> 17938396

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Erik von Elm1, Douglas G Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart J Pocock, Peter C Gøtzsche, Jan P Vandenbroucke.   

Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalizability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover 3 main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors, to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to all 3 study designs and 4 are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available at http://www.annals.org and on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17938396     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  1597 in total

Review 1.  Parity and risk of lung cancer in women: systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Issa J Dahabreh; Thomas A Trikalinos; Jessica K Paulus
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in living kidney donors.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Immaculate F Nevis; Eric McArthur; Jessica M Sontrop; John J Koval; Ngan N Lam; Ainslie M Hildebrand; Peter P Reese; Leroy Storsley; John S Gill; Dorry L Segev; Steven Habbous; Ann Bugeja; Greg A Knoll; Christine Dipchand; Mauricio Monroy-Cuadros; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Genetic covariance between gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and fatty liver risk factors: role of beta2-adrenergic receptor genetic variation in twins.

Authors:  Rohit Loomba; Fangwen Rao; Lian Zhang; Srikrishna Khandrika; Michael G Ziegler; David A Brenner; Daniel T O'Connor
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Validity and reliability of patient selected goals as an outcome measure in overactive bladder.

Authors:  Rufus Cartwright; Sushma Srikrishna; Linda Cardozo; Dudley Robinson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Prognostic significance of multidetector computed tomography in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism: rationale, methodology and reproducibility for the PROTECT study.

Authors:  David Jiménez; José Luis Lobo; Manuel Monreal; Remedios Otero; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Systematic review: The role of race and socioeconomic factors on IBD healthcare delivery and effectiveness.

Authors:  Justin L Sewell; Fernando S Velayos
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Deconstructing quality in education research.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-06

8.  Early identification of patients at risk of acute lung injury: evaluation of lung injury prediction score in a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Ognjen Gajic; Ousama Dabbagh; Pauline K Park; Adebola Adesanya; Steven Y Chang; Peter Hou; Harry Anderson; J Jason Hoth; Mark E Mikkelsen; Nina T Gentile; Michelle N Gong; Daniel Talmor; Ednan Bajwa; Timothy R Watkins; Emir Festic; Murat Yilmaz; Remzi Iscimen; David A Kaufman; Annette M Esper; Ruxana Sadikot; Ivor Douglas; Jonathan Sevransky; Michael Malinchoc
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Vered Shani; Eli Muchtar; Galia Kariv; Eyal Robenshtok; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  On limitations of studies and limitations of therapy options for carotid stenosis: why play golf with only a sand wedge?

Authors:  Jens Fiehler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.