Literature DB >> 31676599

Multisensory Integration and the Society for Neuroscience: Then and Now.

Barry E Stein1, Terrence R Stanford2, Benjamin A Rowland2.   

Abstract

The operation of our multiple and distinct sensory systems has long captured the interest of researchers from multiple disciplines. When the Society was founded 50 years ago to bring neuroscience research under a common banner, sensory research was largely divided along modality-specific lines. At the time, there were only a few physiological and anatomical observations of the multisensory interactions that powerfully influence our everyday perception. Since then, the neuroscientific study of multisensory integration has increased exponentially in both volume and diversity. From initial studies identifying the overlapping receptive fields of multisensory neurons, to subsequent studies of the spatial and temporal principles that govern the integration of multiple sensory cues, our understanding of this phenomenon at the single-neuron level has expanded to include a variety of dimensions. We now can appreciate how multisensory integration can alter patterns of neural activity in time, and even coordinate activity among populations of neurons across different brain areas. There is now a growing battery of sophisticated empirical and computational techniques that are being used to study this process in a number of models. These advancements have not only enhanced our understanding of this remarkable process in the normal adult brain, but also its underlying circuitry, requirements for development, susceptibility to malfunction, and how its principles may be used to mitigate malfunction.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31676599      PMCID: PMC6939490          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0737-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  4 in total

Review 1.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Ripe for solution: Delayed development of multisensory processing in autism and its remediation.

Authors:  Shlomit Beker; John J Foxe; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Sterling W Sheffield; Iliza M Butera; René H Gifford; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Yong Gu; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 6.627

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Morphology and Dendrite-Specific Synaptic Properties of Midbrain Neurons Shape Multimodal Integration.

Authors:  S Weigel; T Kuenzel; K Lischka; G Huang; H Luksch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Stimulus value gates multisensory integration.

Authors:  Naomi L Bean; Barry E Stein; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Tracing Links Between Early Auditory Information Processing and Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Giulia M Giordano; Francesco Brando; Andrea Perrottelli; Giorgio Di Lorenzo; Alberto Siracusano; Luigi Giuliani; Pasquale Pezzella; Mario Altamura; Antonello Bellomo; Giammarco Cascino; Antonio Del Casale; Palmiero Monteleone; Maurizio Pompili; Silvana Galderisi; Mario Maj
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 4.  Debunking a myth: plant consciousness.

Authors:  Jon Mallatt; Michael R Blatt; Andreas Draguhn; David G Robinson; Lincoln Taiz
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.356

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.