Literature DB >> 28398345

Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases.

Daesik Kim1, Kayeong Lim1,2, Sang-Tae Kim2, Sun-Heui Yoon1, Kyoungmi Kim2, Seuk-Min Ryu1,2, Jin-Soo Kim1,2,3.   

Abstract

Cas9-linked deaminases, also called base editors, enable targeted mutation of single nucleotides in eukaryotic genomes. However, their off-target activity is largely unknown. Here we modify digested-genome sequencing (Digenome-seq) to assess the specificity of a programmable deaminase composed of a Cas9 nickase (nCas9) and the deaminase APOBEC1 in the human genome. Genomic DNA is treated with the base editor and a mixture of DNA-modifying enzymes in vitro to produce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at uracil-containing sites. Off-target sites are then computationally identified from whole genome sequencing data. Testing seven different single guide RNAs (sgRNAs), we find that the rAPOBEC1-nCas9 base editor is highly specific, inducing cytosine-to-uracil conversions at only 18 ± 9 sites in the human genome for each sgRNA. Digenome-seq is sensitive enough to capture off-target sites with a substitution frequency of 0.1%. Notably, off-target sites of the base editors are often different from those of Cas9 alone, calling for independent assessment of their genome-wide specificities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28398345     DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  24 in total

1.  An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity.

Authors:  Richard Gabriel; Angelo Lombardo; Anne Arens; Jeffrey C Miller; Pietro Genovese; Christine Kaeppel; Ali Nowrouzi; Cynthia C Bartholomae; Jianbin Wang; Geoffrey Friedman; Michael C Holmes; Philip D Gregory; Hanno Glimm; Manfred Schmidt; Luigi Naldini; Christof von Kalle
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Yebo Wang; Xiwei Wu; Jinhui Wang; Yingjia Wang; Zhaojun Qiu; Tammy Chang; He Huang; Ren-Jang Lin; Jiing-Kuan Yee
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Gaelen T Hess; Laure Frésard; Kyuho Han; Cameron H Lee; Amy Li; Karlene A Cimprich; Stephen B Montgomery; Michael C Bassik
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Highly efficient RNA-guided base editing in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Kyoungmi Kim; Seuk-Min Ryu; Sang-Tae Kim; Gayoung Baek; Daesik Kim; Kayeong Lim; Eugene Chung; Sunghyun Kim; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Yunqing Ma; Jiayuan Zhang; Weijie Yin; Zhenchao Zhang; Yan Song; Xing Chang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Keiji Nishida; Takayuki Arazoe; Nozomu Yachie; Satomi Banno; Mika Kakimoto; Mayura Tabata; Masao Mochizuki; Aya Miyabe; Michihiro Araki; Kiyotaka Y Hara; Zenpei Shimatani; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases.

Authors:  Seung Woo Cho; Sojung Kim; Yongsub Kim; Jiyeon Kweon; Heon Seok Kim; Sangsu Bae; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Sojung Kim; Sunghyun Kim; Jeongbin Park; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs.

Authors:  Yanfang Fu; Jeffry D Sander; Deepak Reyon; Vincent M Cascio; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  93 in total

Review 1.  Single-nucleotide editing: From principle, optimization to application.

Authors:  Jinling Tang; Trevor Lee; Tao Sun
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.878

2.  Genome, Epigenome, and Transcriptome Editing via Chemical Modification of Nucleobases in Living Cells.

Authors:  Brodie L Ranzau; Alexis C Komor
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Adenine base editing in mouse embryos and an adult mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Seuk-Min Ryu; Taeyoung Koo; Kyoungmi Kim; Kayeong Lim; Gayoung Baek; Sang-Tae Kim; Heon Seok Kim; Da-Eun Kim; Hyunji Lee; Eugene Chung; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  In vivo ways to unveil off-targets.

Authors:  Guigen Zhang; Zhuo Zhou; Wensheng Wei
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Identifying genome-wide off-target sites of CRISPR RNA-guided nucleases and deaminases with Digenome-seq.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Beum-Chang Kang; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Erratum: Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Kayeong Lim; Sang-Tae Kim; Sun-Heui Yoon; Kyoungmi Kim; Seuk-Min Ryu; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Base editing on the rise.

Authors:  Andrew May
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  In vivo base editing restores sensory transduction and transiently improves auditory function in a mouse model of recessive deafness.

Authors:  Wei-Hsi Yeh; Olga Shubina-Oleinik; Jonathan M Levy; Bifeng Pan; Gregory A Newby; Michael Wornow; Rachel Burt; Jonathan C Chen; Jeffrey R Holt; David R Liu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  In Vivo Base Editing of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) as a Therapeutic Alternative to Genome Editing.

Authors:  Alexandra C Chadwick; Xiao Wang; Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.311

10.  Detect-seq reveals out-of-protospacer editing and target-strand editing by cytosine base editors.

Authors:  Zhixin Lei; Haowei Meng; Zhicong Lv; Menghao Liu; Huanan Zhao; Hao Wu; Xiaoxue Zhang; Lulu Liu; Yuan Zhuang; Kailin Yin; Yongchang Yan; Chengqi Yi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.