Literature DB >> 28751571

In Vivo Base Editing of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) as a Therapeutic Alternative to Genome Editing.

Alexandra C Chadwick1, Xiao Wang1, Kiran Musunuru2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-efficiency genome editing to disrupt therapeutic target genes, such as PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), has been demonstrated in preclinical animal models, but there are safety concerns because of the unpredictable nature of cellular repair of double-strand breaks, as well as off-target mutagenesis. Moreover, precise knock-in of specific nucleotide changes-whether to introduce or to correct gene mutations-has proven to be inefficient in nonproliferating cells in vivo. Base editors comprising CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [CRISPR]-CRISPR-associated 9) fused to a cytosine deaminase domain can effect the alteration of cytosine bases to thymine bases in genomic DNA in a sequence-specific fashion, without the need for double-strand DNA breaks. The efficacy of base editing has not been established in vivo. The goal of this study was to assess whether in vivo base editing could be used to modify the mouse Pcsk9 gene in a sequence-specific fashion in the liver in adult mice. APPROACH AND
RESULTS: We screened base editors for activity in cultured cells, including human-induced pluripotent stem cells. We then delivered a base editor into the livers of adult mice to assess whether it could introduce site-specific nonsense mutations into the Pcsk9 gene. In adult mice, this resulted in substantially reduced plasma PCSK9 protein levels (>50%), as well as reduced plasma cholesterol levels (≈30%). There was no evidence of off-target mutagenesis, either cytosine-to-thymine edits or indels.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the ability to precisely introduce therapeutically relevant nucleotide variants into the genome in somatic tissues in adult mammals, as well as highlighting a potentially safer alternative to therapeutic genome editing.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PCSK9; gene therapy; lipids and lipoprotein metabolism; molecular biology; nucleotides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28751571      PMCID: PMC5570639          DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol        ISSN: 1079-5642            Impact factor:   8.311


  21 in total

1.  Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR RNA-guided programmable deaminases.

Authors:  Daesik Kim; Kayeong Lim; Sang-Tae Kim; Sun-Heui Yoon; Kyoungmi Kim; Seuk-Min Ryu; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Genome editing in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Alanna Strong; Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Directed evolution using dCas9-targeted somatic hypermutation in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Gaelen T Hess; Laure Frésard; Kyuho Han; Cameron H Lee; Amy Li; Karlene A Cimprich; Stephen B Montgomery; Michael C Bassik
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Decreased plasma cholesterol and hypersensitivity to statins in mice lacking Pcsk9.

Authors:  Shirya Rashid; David E Curtis; Rita Garuti; Norma N Anderson; Yuriy Bashmakov; Y K Ho; Robert E Hammer; Young-Ah Moon; Jay D Horton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Targeted AID-mediated mutagenesis (TAM) enables efficient genomic diversification in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Yunqing Ma; Jiayuan Zhang; Weijie Yin; Zhenchao Zhang; Yan Song; Xing Chang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Keiji Nishida; Takayuki Arazoe; Nozomu Yachie; Satomi Banno; Mika Kakimoto; Mayura Tabata; Masao Mochizuki; Aya Miyabe; Michihiro Araki; Kiyotaka Y Hara; Zenpei Shimatani; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  CRISPR-Cas9 Targeting of PCSK9 in Human Hepatocytes In Vivo-Brief Report.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Avanthi Raghavan; Tao Chen; Lyon Qiao; Yongxian Zhang; Qiurong Ding; Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.311

8.  Permanent alteration of PCSK9 with in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.

Authors:  Qiurong Ding; Alanna Strong; Kevin M Patel; Sze-Ling Ng; Bridget S Gosis; Stephanie N Regan; Chad A Cowan; Daniel J Rader; Kiran Musunuru
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9.

Authors:  F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Therapeutic genome editing by combined viral and non-viral delivery of CRISPR system components in vivo.

Authors:  Hao Yin; Chun-Qing Song; Joseph R Dorkin; Lihua J Zhu; Yingxiang Li; Qiongqiong Wu; Angela Park; Junghoon Yang; Sneha Suresh; Aizhan Bizhanova; Ankit Gupta; Mehmet F Bolukbasi; Stephen Walsh; Roman L Bogorad; Guangping Gao; Zhiping Weng; Yizhou Dong; Victor Koteliansky; Scot A Wolfe; Robert Langer; Wen Xue; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  75 in total

Review 1.  Single-nucleotide editing: From principle, optimization to application.

Authors:  Jinling Tang; Trevor Lee; Tao Sun
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  Novel strategies to target proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9: beyond monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nabil G Seidah; Annik Prat; Angela Pirillo; Alberico Luigi Catapano; Giuseppe Danilo Norata
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  Meganuclease targeting of PCSK9 in macaque liver leads to stable reduction in serum cholesterol.

Authors:  Lili Wang; Jeff Smith; Camilo Breton; Peter Clark; Jia Zhang; Lei Ying; Yan Che; Janel Lape; Peter Bell; Roberto Calcedo; Elizabeth L Buza; Alexei Saveliev; Victor V Bartsevich; Zhenning He; John White; Mingyao Li; Derek Jantz; James M Wilson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and lipid metabolism.

Authors:  Stefano Spolitu; Wen Dai; John A Zadroga; Lale Ozcan
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.776

Review 5.  PCSK9: From Basic Science Discoveries to Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Michael D Shapiro; Hagai Tavori; Sergio Fazio
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  In vivo HSPC gene therapy with base editors allows for efficient reactivation of fetal γ-globin in β-YAC mice.

Authors:  Chang Li; Aphrodite Georgakopoulou; Arpit Mishra; Sucheol Gil; R David Hawkins; Evangelia Yannaki; André Lieber
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

Review 7.  CRISPR-Based Therapeutic Genome Editing: Strategies and In Vivo Delivery by AAV Vectors.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Feng Zhang; Guangping Gao
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Reporting Sex and Sex Differences in Preclinical Studies.

Authors:  Hong S Lu; Ann Marie Schmidt; Robert A Hegele; Nigel Mackman; Daniel J Rader; Christian Weber; Alan Daugherty
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 8.311

Review 9.  Base editing the mammalian genome.

Authors:  Emma M Schatoff; Maria Paz Zafra; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Engineered materials for in vivo delivery of genome-editing machinery.

Authors:  Sheng Tong; Buhle Moyo; Ciaran M Lee; Kam Leong; Gang Bao
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 66.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.