Alexandra C Chadwick1, Xiao Wang1, Kiran Musunuru2. 1. From the Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 2. From the Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Medicine, and Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. kiranmusunuru@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High-efficiency genome editing to disrupt therapeutic target genes, such as PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), has been demonstrated in preclinical animal models, but there are safety concerns because of the unpredictable nature of cellular repair of double-strand breaks, as well as off-target mutagenesis. Moreover, precise knock-in of specific nucleotide changes-whether to introduce or to correct gene mutations-has proven to be inefficient in nonproliferating cells in vivo. Base editors comprising CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [CRISPR]-CRISPR-associated 9) fused to a cytosine deaminase domain can effect the alteration of cytosine bases to thymine bases in genomic DNA in a sequence-specific fashion, without the need for double-strand DNA breaks. The efficacy of base editing has not been established in vivo. The goal of this study was to assess whether in vivo base editing could be used to modify the mouse Pcsk9 gene in a sequence-specific fashion in the liver in adult mice. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We screened base editors for activity in cultured cells, including human-induced pluripotent stem cells. We then delivered a base editor into the livers of adult mice to assess whether it could introduce site-specific nonsense mutations into the Pcsk9 gene. In adult mice, this resulted in substantially reduced plasma PCSK9 protein levels (>50%), as well as reduced plasma cholesterol levels (≈30%). There was no evidence of off-target mutagenesis, either cytosine-to-thymine edits or indels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the ability to precisely introduce therapeutically relevant nucleotide variants into the genome in somatic tissues in adult mammals, as well as highlighting a potentially safer alternative to therapeutic genome editing.
OBJECTIVE: High-efficiency genome editing to disrupt therapeutic target genes, such as PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9), has been demonstrated in preclinical animal models, but there are safety concerns because of the unpredictable nature of cellular repair of double-strand breaks, as well as off-target mutagenesis. Moreover, precise knock-in of specific nucleotide changes-whether to introduce or to correct gene mutations-has proven to be inefficient in nonproliferating cells in vivo. Base editors comprising CRISPR-Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [CRISPR]-CRISPR-associated 9) fused to a cytosine deaminase domain can effect the alteration of cytosine bases to thymine bases in genomic DNA in a sequence-specific fashion, without the need for double-strand DNA breaks. The efficacy of base editing has not been established in vivo. The goal of this study was to assess whether in vivo base editing could be used to modify the mousePcsk9 gene in a sequence-specific fashion in the liver in adult mice. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We screened base editors for activity in cultured cells, including human-induced pluripotent stem cells. We then delivered a base editor into the livers of adult mice to assess whether it could introduce site-specific nonsense mutations into the Pcsk9 gene. In adult mice, this resulted in substantially reduced plasma PCSK9 protein levels (>50%), as well as reduced plasma cholesterol levels (≈30%). There was no evidence of off-target mutagenesis, either cytosine-to-thymine edits or indels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the ability to precisely introduce therapeutically relevant nucleotide variants into the genome in somatic tissues in adult mammals, as well as highlighting a potentially safer alternative to therapeutic genome editing.
Authors: Gaelen T Hess; Laure Frésard; Kyuho Han; Cameron H Lee; Amy Li; Karlene A Cimprich; Stephen B Montgomery; Michael C Bassik Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Shirya Rashid; David E Curtis; Rita Garuti; Norma N Anderson; Yuriy Bashmakov; Y K Ho; Robert E Hammer; Young-Ah Moon; Jay D Horton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Qiurong Ding; Alanna Strong; Kevin M Patel; Sze-Ling Ng; Bridget S Gosis; Stephanie N Regan; Chad A Cowan; Daniel J Rader; Kiran Musunuru Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: F Ann Ran; Le Cong; Winston X Yan; David A Scott; Jonathan S Gootenberg; Andrea J Kriz; Bernd Zetsche; Ophir Shalem; Xuebing Wu; Kira S Makarova; Eugene V Koonin; Phillip A Sharp; Feng Zhang Journal: Nature Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Hao Yin; Chun-Qing Song; Joseph R Dorkin; Lihua J Zhu; Yingxiang Li; Qiongqiong Wu; Angela Park; Junghoon Yang; Sneha Suresh; Aizhan Bizhanova; Ankit Gupta; Mehmet F Bolukbasi; Stephen Walsh; Roman L Bogorad; Guangping Gao; Zhiping Weng; Yizhou Dong; Victor Koteliansky; Scot A Wolfe; Robert Langer; Wen Xue; Daniel G Anderson Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Lili Wang; Jeff Smith; Camilo Breton; Peter Clark; Jia Zhang; Lei Ying; Yan Che; Janel Lape; Peter Bell; Roberto Calcedo; Elizabeth L Buza; Alexei Saveliev; Victor V Bartsevich; Zhenning He; John White; Mingyao Li; Derek Jantz; James M Wilson Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Hong S Lu; Ann Marie Schmidt; Robert A Hegele; Nigel Mackman; Daniel J Rader; Christian Weber; Alan Daugherty Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 8.311