BACKGROUND: Food security is a severe problem in the United States. Few studies have examined its relationship with food shopping behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between food security and store-specific and overall food shopping among residents of low-income neighborhoods. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: Five hundred twenty-seven households were recruited from two counties in South Carolina from November 2013 to May 2014, and 474 households were included in the final analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Food security was assessed using the 18-item US-Household Food Security Module questionnaire, and classified into three categories: high or marginal food security (FS), low food security (LFS), and very low food security (VLFS). Store-specific shopping behaviors including frequency, store type, and transportation were queried via in-person interview for the three most-frequented grocery stores. Distance from participants' homes to their reported stores was calculated using Geographic Information Systems. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Multivariate linear regression for analyses of distance and frequency and multinomial/ordinary logistic regression for analyses of store type and transportation were used. RESULTS: Compared to FS participants, a significantly higher proportion of VLFS participants reported a convenience/dollar store as their most-frequented store (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95) or a lack of transportation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.33). They also shopped less frequently (b=-.31, P=0.03) at their third most-frequented store and traveled fewer total miles for shopping (b=-4.71, P=0.04). In analyses considering all stores jointly, LFS participants had lower odds of shopping at both supermarkets and convenience/dollar stores (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91) compared to food-secure residents. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that households with VLFS tend to shop more frequently in stores that have less-healthful options, such as convenience/dollar stores. These findings lend support to ongoing community and policy interventions aimed at improving food access among food-insecure populations.
BACKGROUND: Food security is a severe problem in the United States. Few studies have examined its relationship with food shopping behaviors. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between food security and store-specific and overall food shopping among residents of low-income neighborhoods. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS/ SETTING: Five hundred twenty-seven households were recruited from two counties in South Carolina from November 2013 to May 2014, and 474 households were included in the final analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Food security was assessed using the 18-item US-Household Food Security Module questionnaire, and classified into three categories: high or marginal food security (FS), low food security (LFS), and very low food security (VLFS). Store-specific shopping behaviors including frequency, store type, and transportation were queried via in-person interview for the three most-frequented grocery stores. Distance from participants' homes to their reported stores was calculated using Geographic Information Systems. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Multivariate linear regression for analyses of distance and frequency and multinomial/ordinary logistic regression for analyses of store type and transportation were used. RESULTS: Compared to FS participants, a significantly higher proportion of VLFS participants reported a convenience/dollar store as their most-frequented store (odds ratio [OR] 2.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.95) or a lack of transportation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.33). They also shopped less frequently (b=-.31, P=0.03) at their third most-frequented store and traveled fewer total miles for shopping (b=-4.71, P=0.04). In analyses considering all stores jointly, LFS participants had lower odds of shopping at both supermarkets and convenience/dollar stores (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.91) compared to food-secure residents. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings suggest that households with VLFS tend to shop more frequently in stores that have less-healthful options, such as convenience/dollar stores. These findings lend support to ongoing community and policy interventions aimed at improving food access among food-insecure populations.
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Angela M Odoms-Young; Constance Dallas; Elaine Hardy; April Watkins; Jacqueline Hoskins-Wroten; Loys Holland Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2011-04-21
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Teretha Hollis-Neely; Richard T Campbell; Nellie Holmes; Gloria Watkins; Robin Nwankwo; Angela Odoms-Young Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Barbara A Israel; Graciela Mentz; Patricia Y Miranda; Alisha Opperman; Angela M Odoms-Young Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Angela D Liese; Bethany A Bell; Timothy L Barnes; Natalie Colabianchi; James D Hibbert; Christine E Blake; Darcy A Freedman Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Matthew K Taylor; Debra K Sullivan; Edward F Ellerbeck; Byron J Gajewski; Heather D Gibbs Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Jonathan Cantor; Robin Beckman; Rebecca L Collins; Madhumita Ghosh Dastidar; Andrea S Richardson; Tamara Dubowitz Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Rebecca C Woodruff; Regine Haardörfer; Ilana G Raskind; April Hermstad; Michelle C Kegler Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Karen Glanz; Annie Chung; Knashawn H Morales; Pui L Kwong; Douglas Wiebe; Donna Paulhamus Giordano; Colleen M Brensinger; Allison Karpyn Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-12-31 Impact factor: 3.046