Angela D Liese1, Bethany A Bell2, Timothy L Barnes1, Natalie Colabianchi3, James D Hibbert1, Christine E Blake4, Darcy A Freedman5. 1. 1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA. 2. 2College of Education,University of South Carolina,Columbia,SC,USA. 3. 3Institute for Social Research,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USA. 4. 4Department of Health Promotion,Education,and Behavior,University of South Carolina,Columbia,SC,USA. 5. 5College of Social Work,University of South Carolina,Columbia,SC,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is influenced by behavioural and environmental factors, but these have rarely been assessed simultaneously. We aimed to quantify the relative influence of supermarket availability, perceptions of the food environment and shopping behaviour on F&V intake. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Eight counties in South Carolina, USA, with verified locations of all supermarkets. SUBJECTS: A telephone survey of 831 household food shoppers ascertained F&V intake with a seventeen-item screener, primary food store location, shopping frequency and perceptions of healthy food availability, and supermarket availability was calculated with a geographic information system. Path analysis was conducted. We report standardized beta coefficients on paths significant at the 0·05 level. RESULTS: Frequency of grocery shopping at primary food store (β = 0·11) was the only factor exerting an independent, statistically significant direct effect on F&V intake. Supermarket availability was significantly associated with distance to utilized food store (β = -0·24) and shopping frequency (β = 0·10). Increased supermarket availability was significantly and positively related to perceived healthy food availability in the neighbourhood (β = 0·18) and ease of shopping access (β = 0·09). Collectively considering all model paths linked to perceived availability of healthy foods, this measure was the only other factor to have a significant total effect on F&V intake. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of the literature to date has suggested an independent and important role of supermarket availability for F&V intake, our study found only indirect effects of supermarket availability and suggests that food shopping frequency and perceptions of healthy food availability are two integral components of a network of influences on F&V intake.
OBJECTIVE: Fruit and vegetable (F&V) intake is influenced by behavioural and environmental factors, but these have rarely been assessed simultaneously. We aimed to quantify the relative influence of supermarket availability, perceptions of the food environment and shopping behaviour on F&V intake. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Eight counties in South Carolina, USA, with verified locations of all supermarkets. SUBJECTS: A telephone survey of 831 household food shoppers ascertained F&V intake with a seventeen-item screener, primary food store location, shopping frequency and perceptions of healthy food availability, and supermarket availability was calculated with a geographic information system. Path analysis was conducted. We report standardized beta coefficients on paths significant at the 0·05 level. RESULTS: Frequency of grocery shopping at primary food store (β = 0·11) was the only factor exerting an independent, statistically significant direct effect on F&V intake. Supermarket availability was significantly associated with distance to utilized food store (β = -0·24) and shopping frequency (β = 0·10). Increased supermarket availability was significantly and positively related to perceived healthy food availability in the neighbourhood (β = 0·18) and ease of shopping access (β = 0·09). Collectively considering all model paths linked to perceived availability of healthy foods, this measure was the only other factor to have a significant total effect on F&V intake. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of the literature to date has suggested an independent and important role of supermarket availability for F&V intake, our study found only indirect effects of supermarket availability and suggests that food shopping frequency and perceptions of healthy food availability are two integral components of a network of influences on F&V intake.
Authors: Stephanie B Jilcott Pitts; Jared T McGuirt; Lucas J Carr; Qiang Wu; Thomas C Keyserling Journal: Ecol Food Nutr Date: 2012 Impact factor: 1.692
Authors: Shannon N Zenk; Amy J Schulz; Teretha Hollis-Neely; Richard T Campbell; Nellie Holmes; Gloria Watkins; Robin Nwankwo; Angela Odoms-Young Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Erika R Shaver; Richard C Sadler; Alex B Hill; Kendall Bell; Myah Ray; Jennifer Choy-Shin; Joy Lerner; Teresa Soldner; Andrew D Jones Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Justin Banks; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Linda A Schiffer; Richard T Campbell; Mirjana A Antonic; Carol L Braunschweig; Angela M Odoms-Young; Angela Kong Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Darcy A Freedman; Bethany A Bell; Jill K Clark; Patricia A Sharpe; Erika S Trapl; Elaine A Borawski; Stephanie N Pike; Chaturia Rouse; Ashwini R Sehgal Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Timothy L Barnes; Darcy A Freedman; Bethany A Bell; Natalie Colabianchi; Angela D Liese Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2015-10-02 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Lorraine R Reitzel; Hiroe Okamoto; Daphne C Hernandez; Seann D Regan; Lorna H McNeill; Ezemenari M Obasi Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2016-01