Literature DB >> 33421079

The healthy food marketing strategies study: design, baseline characteristics, and supermarket compliance.

Karen Glanz1, Annie Chung1, Knashawn H Morales1, Pui L Kwong1, Douglas Wiebe1, Donna Paulhamus Giordano1,2, Colleen M Brensinger1, Allison Karpyn2.   

Abstract

Identifying effective strategies to promote healthy eating and reduce obesity is a priority in the USA, especially among low-income and minority groups, who often have less access to healthy food and higher rates of obesity. Efforts to improve food access have led to more supermarkets in low-income, ethnically diverse neighborhoods. However, this alone may not be enough to reduce food insecurity and improve residents' diet quality and health. This paper summarizes the design, methods, baseline findings, and supermarket in-store marketing strategy compliance for a randomized trial of the impact of healthy food marketing on the purchase of healthier "target" food items. Thirty-three supermarkets in low-income, high-minority neighborhoods in the metropolitan Philadelphia area were matched on store size and percentage of sales from government food assistance programs and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Healthy marketing strategies, including increased availability of healthier "target" products, prime shelf-placement and call-out promotion signs, and reduced availability of regular "comparison" products, were implemented in 16 intervention stores for an 18 month period for over 100 individual food items. Six product categories were studied: bread, checkout cooler beverages, cheese, frozen dinners, milk, and salty snacks. The primary outcome measure was weekly sales per store in each product category for 1 year preintervention and 18 months during the intervention. Compliance with the marketing strategies was assessed twice per month for the first 6 months and once a month thereafter. Store and neighborhood characteristics were not significantly different between control and intervention stores. Intercept surveys with customers to assess shopping habits and grocery marketing environment assessments to examine the food promotion environment were completed in the same six food categories. In intercept surveys, 51.0% of shoppers self-identified as overweight and 60.6% wanted to change their weight. Shoppers who typically purchased one type of food over another commonly did so out of habit or because the item was on sale. Findings revealed that preintervention sales of healthier "target" or regular "comparison" items did not differ between intervention and control stores for 1 year prior to intervention implementation. Rates of compliance with the healthy marketing strategies were high, averaging 76.5% over the first 12 months in all 16 stores. If healthy in-store marketing interventions are effective in this scaled-up, longer-term study, they should be translated into wider use in community supermarkets. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food environment; Food insecurity; Food shopping; Healthy food marketing; Obesity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33421079      PMCID: PMC7796717          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  52 in total

1.  Effect of a grocery store intervention on sales of nutritious foods to youth and their families.

Authors:  Ashley S Holmes; Paul A Estabrooks; George C Davis; Elena L Serrano
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.910

2.  Changes in food and beverage environments after an urban corner store intervention.

Authors:  Erica Cavanaugh; Sarah Green; Giridhar Mallya; Ann Tierney; Colleen Brensinger; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Food insecurity and obesity: research gaps, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Alison G M Brown; Layla E Esposito; Rachel A Fisher; Holly L Nicastro; Derrick C Tabor; Jenelle R Walker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The association between the "Plate it Up Kentucky" supermarket intervention and changes in grocery shopping practices among rural residents.

Authors:  Alison Gustafson; Shu Wen Ng; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The Association between Food Security and Store-Specific and Overall Food Shopping Behaviors.

Authors:  Xiaonan Ma; Angela D Liese; James Hibbert; Bethany A Bell; Sara Wilcox; Patricia A Sharpe
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 6.  Strategies for increasing fruit and vegetable intake in grocery stores and communities: policy, pricing, and environmental change.

Authors:  Karen Glanz; Amy L Yaroch
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Food stamps, food insecurity, and health outcomes among elderly Americans.

Authors:  Tae-Young Pak; GwanSeon Kim
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Is proximity to a food retail store associated with diet and BMI in Glasgow, Scotland?

Authors:  Laura Macdonald; Anne Ellaway; Kylie Ball; Sally Macintyre
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Customer Purchase Intentions and Choice in Food Retail Environments: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Iana A Castro; Anuja Majmundar; Christine B Williams; Barbara Baquero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Evaluation of Store Environment Changes of an In-Store Intervention to Promote Fruits and Vegetables in Latino/Hispanic-Focused Food Stores.

Authors:  Jennifer Sanchez-Flack; Barbara Baquero; Shih-Fan Lin; George Belch; Julie L Pickrel; Cheryl A M Anderson; Elva Arredondo; Maria Elena Martinez; Joni Mayer; Ming Ji; John P Elder; Guadalupe X Ayala
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.