Angela D Liese1, Patricia A Sharpe2, Bethany A Bell3, Brent Hutto2, Jessica Stucker2, Sara Wilcox4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. Electronic address: liese@sc.edu. 2. Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. 3. College of Social Work, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. 4. Prevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA; Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about patterns of household food insecurity (HFI) across more than two time points in adults in the United States, the frequency predictors of different trajectories. The distinctions between persistent and transient food insecurity trajectories may be crucial to developing effective interventions. OBJECTIVE: To characterize dominant trajectories of food security status over three time points between 2013 and 2016 and identify demographic, socioeconomic and health-related predictors of persistent and transient HFI. DESIGN: Cohort study in disadvantaged communities in South Carolina. SETTING: and subjects: 397 middle-aged participants, predominantly female, African American, living in USDA-designated food deserts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Household food insecurity over time using the 18-item USDA's Household Food Security Survey Module. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive analyses of food security trajectories and multinomial regression analyses. RESULTS: At baseline (2013-2014), 61% of households reported HFI during the previous 12 months, which decreased to 54% in 2015 and to 51% in 2016. Only 27% of households were persistently food secure, 36% experienced transient and 37% persistent food insecurity. Female sex (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.2-5.9), being married or living with a partner (OR 2.4, 95CI% 1.1-5.3) and fair health status (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.2-8.8) were associated with increased odds of persistent food insecurity. Fair health was also a significant predictor of transient food insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that future research should focus on persistent versus transient trajectories separately and that tailored interventions may be needed to make progress on alleviating food insecurity among disadvantaged communities.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about patterns of household food insecurity (HFI) across more than two time points in adults in the United States, the frequency predictors of different trajectories. The distinctions between persistent and transient food insecurity trajectories may be crucial to developing effective interventions. OBJECTIVE: To characterize dominant trajectories of food security status over three time points between 2013 and 2016 and identify demographic, socioeconomic and health-related predictors of persistent and transient HFI. DESIGN: Cohort study in disadvantaged communities in South Carolina. SETTING: and subjects: 397 middle-aged participants, predominantly female, African American, living in USDA-designated food deserts. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Household food insecurity over time using the 18-item USDA's Household Food Security Survey Module. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Descriptive analyses of food security trajectories and multinomial regression analyses. RESULTS: At baseline (2013-2014), 61% of households reported HFI during the previous 12 months, which decreased to 54% in 2015 and to 51% in 2016. Only 27% of households were persistently food secure, 36% experienced transient and 37% persistent food insecurity. Female sex (OR 2.7, 95%CI 1.2-5.9), being married or living with a partner (OR 2.4, 95CI% 1.1-5.3) and fair health status (OR 4.4, 95%CI 2.2-8.8) were associated with increased odds of persistent food insecurity. Fair health was also a significant predictor of transient food insecurity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that future research should focus on persistent versus transient trajectories separately and that tailored interventions may be needed to make progress on alleviating food insecurity among disadvantaged communities.
Authors: Edward H Ip; Santiago Saldana; Thomas A Arcury; Joseph G Grzywacz; Grisel Trejo; Sara A Quandt Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Erica C Jansen; Nicole Kasper; Julie C Lumeng; Holly E Brophy Herb; Mildred A Horodynski; Alison L Miller; Dawn Contreras; Karen E Peterson Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Patricia A Sharpe; Angela D Liese; Bethany A Bell; Sara Wilcox; Brent E Hutto; Jessica Stucker Journal: J Hunger Environ Nutr Date: 2017-10-24
Authors: Joni L Ricks; Susan D Cochran; Onyebuchi A Arah; John K Williams; Teresa E Seeman Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Patricia A Sharpe; Bethany A Bell; Angela D Liese; Sara Wilcox; Jessica Stucker; Brent E Hutto Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Ingrid L Tablazon; Deepak Palakshappa; Faith C O'Brian; Brenda Ramirez; Joseph A Skelton; Laurie W Albertini; Kimberly G Montez Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 2.993