Jennifer Bridwell-Rabb1,2,3, Aoshu Zhong4,5, He G Sun4,5, Catherine L Drennan1,2,3, Hung-Wen Liu4,5. 1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 2. Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 3. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. 4. Division of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. 5. Department of Chemistry, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Abstract
Oxetanocin A (OXT-A) is a potent antitumour, antiviral and antibacterial compound. Biosynthesis of OXT-A has been linked to a plasmid-borne Bacillus megaterium gene cluster that contains four genes: oxsA, oxsB, oxrA and oxrB. Here we show that both the oxsA and oxsB genes are required for the production of OXT-A. Biochemical analysis of the encoded proteins, a cobalamin (Cbl)-dependent S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) radical enzyme, OxsB, and an HD-domain phosphohydrolase, OxsA, reveals that OXT-A is derived from a 2'-deoxyadenosine phosphate in an OxsB-catalysed ring contraction reaction initiated by hydrogen atom abstraction from C2'. Hence, OxsB represents the first biochemically characterized non-methylating Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme. X-ray analysis of OxsB reveals the fold of a Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme, a family of enzymes with an estimated 7,000 members. Overall, this work provides a framework for understanding the interplay of AdoMet and Cbl cofactors and expands the catalytic repertoire of Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzymes.
Oxetanocin A (OXT-A) is a potent antitumour, antiviral and antibacterial compound. Biosynthesis of OXT-A has been linked to a plasmid-borne Bacillus megaterium gene cluster that contains four genes: oxsA, oxsB, oxrA and oxrB. Here we show that both the oxsA and oxsB genes are required for the production of OXT-A. Biochemical analysis of the encoded proteins, a cobalamin (Cbl)-dependent S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) radical enzyme, OxsB, and an HD-domain phosphohydrolase, OxsA, reveals that OXT-A is derived from a 2'-deoxyadenosine phosphate in an OxsB-catalysed ring contraction reaction initiated by hydrogen atom abstraction from C2'. Hence, OxsB represents the first biochemically characterized non-methylating Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme. X-ray analysis of OxsB reveals the fold of a Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme, a family of enzymes with an estimated 7,000 members. Overall, this work provides a framework for understanding the interplay of AdoMet and Cbl cofactors and expands the catalytic repertoire of Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzymes.
Oxetanocin-A (OXT-A, 1) is a nucleoside analog produced by
Bacillus megaterium NK84-0128[1]. The phosphorylated forms of OXT-A inhibit cellular and viral
DNA polymerases[2] and have shown
activity against hepatitis B[3] and
herpes simplex viruses[1], among others.
The plasmid-borne gene cluster for OXT-A biosynthesis and resistance is located within
the BglII-D fragment[4]
and contains four open-reading-frames that encode two HD-domain phosphohydrolases
(oxsA and oxrB), a cobalamin (Cbl)-dependent
S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) radical enzyme
(oxsB), and a pentapeptide repeat protein (oxrA). The
simplicity of the cluster suggests that OXT-A may be produced through rearrangement of a
purine nucleosideco-opted from a primary metabolic pathway. Since AdoMet radical
enzymes catalyze some of the most challenging chemical transformations, OxsB is a likely
candidate for catalyzing formation of the eponymous oxetane ring.AdoMet radical enzymes contain a [4Fe-4S] cluster that, when
reduced, cleaves AdoMet and produces a highly reactive
5′-deoxyadenosyl radical
(5′-dAdo•)[5]. Cbl-binding proteins, on the other hand, generate
5′-dAdo• through homolytic Co-C bond cleavage of
adenosylcobalmin[6] and methylate
nucleophilic substrates through heterolytic Co-C bond cleavage of methylcobalamin
(MeCbl)[6]. With over 7,000
AdoMet radical enzymes now annotated as Cbl-dependent, these dual cofactor enzymes are
emerging as a new superfamily[7-16]. Characterized Cbl-dependent AdoMetradical enzymes catalyze methylation of unactivated C- and P-centers[10,12-14,17-20], but not all reactions attributed to this family involve
methylation[21]. Here we
describe the first characterization of a non-methylating Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical
enzyme and the first structure of a superfamily member.
oxsA, B are OXT-A biosynthetic genes
A variety of nucleosides and sugars were tested for competence as
substrate(s), however, no turnover was observed with any of the compounds tested
(Extended Data Fig. 1). These negative
results prompted us to take a genetic approach to determine if other gene products
are required for OxsB activity. A non-producing, OXT-A resistant strain, B.
megaterium NRS 269, and an E. coli-Bacillus shuttle
vector pMM1522 were used in these experiments (Extended Data Fig. 2a). B. megaterium NRS 269 carrying
the Bglα-D fragment produces OXT-A (Extended Data Fig. 2b). Deletion of oxsA
or oxsB, however, abolishes OXT-A formation, whereas deletion of
oxrA and oxrB has no effect on OXT-A
production (Fig 1a). Notably, both OxsA and
OxrB are annotated as HD-domain phosphohydrolases, but the lack of OXT-A production
in the oxsA deletion experiment indicates OxrB cannot fulfill the
functional role of OxsA (Fig 1a). In a separate
experiment, B. megaterium NRS 269 carrying only
oxsA, oxsB, or the
oxsA/oxsB pair was tested for OXT-A
production. Here, OXT-A formation was observed only when both oxsA
and oxsB were present, demonstrating again that
oxsA and oxsB are required for OXT-A
biosynthesis (Extended Data Fig. 2c).
Extended Data Figure 1
Putative substrates tested in the OxsB and OxsA/OxsB reactions
Reductants used to test these substrates were sodium dithionite,
hexa-ammineruthenium(II) chloride, NADPH/methylviologen, titanium(III)
citrate/methyl viologen, and a flavodoxin/flavodoxin-NADPH reductase
system[35,47,48].
Extended Data Figure 2
In vivo gene expression and HPLC analysis reveal oxsA
and oxsB are required for OXT-A biosynthesis
(a) To probe which genes located within the
BglII-D fragment are responsible for OXT-A (chemical
structure shown in left panel) production, B. megaterium
NRS 269 was transformed using the E. coli-Bacillus shuttle
vector pMM1522. (b) In vivo product profiles of B.
megaterium NRS 269 strains. (i) transformed with pMM1522 empty
vector (as a control); (ii) transformed with pMM1522 that contains the
BglII-D (oxsA, oxsB, oxrA, oxrB)
fragment. (c) In vivo product profiles of B. megaterium
NRS 269 strains. (i) carrying only oxsB; (ii)
carrying both oxsA and oxsB; (iii)
carrying only oxsA.
Figure 1
oxsA and oxsB encode OXT-A biosynthetic
enzymes. (a) In vivo product profiles of B.
megaterium NRS 269 strains with the designated genes deleted. The
top trace is an OXT-A standard. (b) Proposed pathway for OXT-A
biosynthesis, which requires OxsA, OxsB, and aldehyde reduction to go to
completion.
To verify the above observation, substrate screening was retried using OxsA
and reconstituted OxsB. A new product, P2, could be detected in the
reaction mixture when 2′-deoxyadenosine-5′-monophosphate (dAMP), or
its 5′-diphosphate (dADP) or 5′-triphosphate (dATP) form were
employed as substrates (Extended Data Fig. 3a).
P2 was characterized using MS and 1H NMR and shown to be the aldehyde
form of OXT-A 5′-monophosphate (2 in Fig. 1b, Extended Data Fig.
3b). Upon treatment with NaBD4, 2 is converted to
OXT-A 5′-monophosphate (3 in Fig.
1b), verified based on co-elution with a chemically synthesized standard
of 3 (Extended Data Fig. 3c and
4). These results confirm the requirement
of OxsB and OxsA in OXT-A biosynthesis and identify dAMP, dADP and dATP as OXT-A
precursors (1 in Fig. 1b).
Approximately 4–10 turnovers of dATP to form 2 are observed in
a 12-hr incubation using 20 μM OxsB and 20 μM OxsA (see Methods).
The aldehydic group of 2 must be reduced to complete OXT-A
(1) biosynthesis; indeed, when OxsB/OxsA are assayed in the
presence of B. megaterium NRS 269 cell extracts or horse liver
alcohol dehydrogenase, 1 is produced (Extended Data Fig. 3d,e). OxsA was recently shown to catalyze the
sequential hydrolysis of mono-, di-, and tri-phosphorylated OXT-A compounds into
OXT-A (3→1, Fig.
1d)[22], supporting
the ability of the OxsB/OxsA pair to turnover dAMP, dADP and dATP.
Extended Data Figure 3
Enzymatic production of OXT-A
HPLC analysis in panel a was performed using a CarboPac PA1 Dionex
column whereas a C18 column was used in panels c–e. (a)
HPLC analysis of the reactions catalyzed by OxsA and OxsB using dAMP, dADP,
or dATP as substrate. (i) incubation with reconstituted OxsB and OxsA with
dAMP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV (full reaction, see
Methods for details); (ii) full reaction without OxsB; (iii) full reaction
without OxsA; (iv) full reaction without dAMP; (v) full reaction without
AdoMet; (vi) full reaction without HO-Cbl; (vii) full reaction without the
reductants NADPH and MV; (viii) full reaction substituted with dADP instead
of dAMP; (ix) full reaction substituted with dATP instead of dAMP.
(b) MS spectrum (ESI positive) used to confirm the identity
of compound 2 as the corresponding aldehyde of OXT-A
5′-monophosphate. MS of the aldehyde compound was performed
following treatment of the reaction mixture with CIP and purification by
HPLC. (c) HPLC analysis confirms that reduction of compound
2 results in formation of OXT-A-P (3). (i)
isolated 2; (ii) isolated 2 treated with
NaBD4; (iii) co-injection of 2 treated with
NaBD4 with a chemically synthesized standard of
3; (iv) standard of 3. (d) Direct formation of
OXT-A is observed when cell extract is included in the reaction conditions.
(i) HPLC analysis after incubation of reconstituted OxsB with OxsA, dATP,
DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV, and cell extract of
B. megaterium NRS 269 (full reaction); (ii) full
reaction without OxsB; (iii) full reaction without OxsA; (iv) full reaction
without dATP; (v) full reaction without AdoMet; (vi) full reaction without
MgCl2; (vii) full reaction without cell extract; (viii) OXT-A
(1) standard. (e) Direct formation of OXT-A
can also be observed when alcohol dehydrogenase is included in the reaction
mixture. (i) HPLC analysis after incubation with reconstituted OxsB and OxsA
with dATP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV and horse liver
alcohol dehydrogenase (full reaction); (ii) full reaction without OxsA and
OxsB; (iii) OXT-A standard.
Extended Data Figure 4
Chemical synthesis of OXT-A-P (3)
Importantly, OxsB has all of the hallmarks of an AdoMet radical enzyme; both
AdoMet and reductant are required for product formation (Extended Data Fig. 3a) and 5′-dAdoH is generated
(Extended Data Fig. 5a). Additionally,
when OxsB is incubated with
[2′-2H2]-2′-dAMP, AdoMet, OxsA
and reductant, mono-deuterated 5′-dAdoH is formed (Extended Data Fig. 5b), consistent with AdoMet radical
chemistry that initiates with hydrogen atom abstraction from C2′ of dAMP.
Additional experiments performed using OxsB, OxsA, and
[3′-2H]-2′-dAMP show label retention
in OXT-A (Extended Data Fig. 5c), further
implicating C2′ as the site of hydrogen atom abstraction. All of these
results are consistent with the annotation of OxsB as an AdoMet radical enzyme.
Furthermore, product formation requires Cbl (Extended
Data Fig. 3a), consistent with Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical
chemistry.
Extended Data Figure 5
Characterization of OxsB as an AdoMet radical enzyme
(a) Consistent with its classification as an AdoMet
radical enzyme, OxsB catalyzes the reductive cleavage of AdoMet to generate
5′-dAdoH. HPLC analysis (C18 column, 2–20%
CH3CN in 1% NH4OAc linear gradient
elution) of reaction catalyzed by OxsA and OxsB. (i) Reaction of
reconstituted OxsB with OxsA, dAMP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2,
NADPH, MV (full reaction, see Methods for details); (ii) full reaction
without dAMP; (iii) 5′-dAdoH standard. (b) MS spectrum
(ESI positive) of 5′-dAdoH generated in the OxsA and OxsB reaction
using [2′-2H2]-2′-dAMP
as substrate shows incorporation of the deuterium label into
5′-dAdoH and thus indicates hydrogen atom abstraction occurs at
C2′. The less than full deuterium incorporation is likely due to the
co-occurrence of uncoupled quenching of 5′-dAdo•, a common
phenomenon in many AdoMet radical enzymes[59]. (c) MS spectrum (ESI
positive) of OXT-A (1) generated in the OxsA and OxsB reaction
using [3′-2H]-2′-dAMP as
substrate, which shows retention of the deuterium label in product, again
consistent with hydrogen atom abstraction at C2′.
A new mode of Cbl binding in OxsB
Structures of apo-OxsB (87 kDa), [4Fe-4S] cluster
reconstituted OxsB with aquaCbl bound (OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]),
and OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S] with AdoMet bound
(OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet) were solved to 2.55-,
1.80-, and 1.85-Å resolution, respectively (Extended Data Table 1). These structures show that OxsB is composed of
four modular domains (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 6).
Extended Data Table 1
Data collection and refinement statistics of OxsB
Apo-OxsBNative data used for
SIRAS
SeMetApo-OxsB†§ (Se-peak, dataset 1)
SeMetApo-OxsB†§ (Se-peak, dataset 2)
SeMetApo-OxsB (Se-peak, dataset
3)
OxsBCbl/[4Fe4S]
OxsBCbl/[4Fe4S]/AdoMet
Data
collection
Space group
P212121
P212121
P212121
P212121
P212121
P212121
Cell dimensions
a, b,
c (Å)
94.5, 105.2, 118.3
94.3, 103.3, 117.0
94.7, 107.4, 116.9
94.4, 107.0117.6
89.4, 99.6, 121.4
89.4, 99.6, 121.4
α,
β, γ (°)
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
90.0, 90.0, 90.0
Resolution (Å)*
50-3.20 (3.31-3.20)
50-3.40 (3.53-3.40)
50-2.90 (3.00- 2.90)
50-2.55 (2.64-2.55)
50-1.80 (1.86- 1.80)
50-1.85 (1.92-1.85)
Rmerge*
0.086 (0.57)
0.13 (0.58)
0.14 (0.62)
0.097 (0.60)
0.059 (0.84)
0.052 (0.59)
I/σ/*
22.1 (3.0)
12.1 (2.8)
13.1 (3.0)
15.4(2.7)
22.9 (2.5)
23.1 (1.9)
Completeness (%)*
98.4 (99.2)
99.8 (100)
99.8 (100)
99.8 (99.2)
100 (100)
99.2 (99.2)
Redundancy*
6.6 (6.8)
4.4 (4.4)
5.8 (5.9)
6.5 (6.5)
13.3(13.2)
3.7 (3.7)
CC1/2*
-‡
-‡
-‡
-‡
(0.89)
(0.77)
Refinement
Resolution (Å)
2.55
1.80
1.85
No. reflections*
39020 (3854)
101068 (10014)
93159 (9182)
Rwork/Rfree
0.186, 0.225
0.181, 0.211
0.192, 0.232
No. atoms
Protein
5991
5854
6082
Cbl
-
91
91
[4Fe-4S]
-
8
8
AdoMet
-
-
54
DTT
-
8
-
MES
-
12
12
Ethylene glycol
120
120
64
Water
203
664
517
B-factors
Protein
53.33
37.49
44.66
Cbl
-
29.80
38.93
[4Fe-4S]
-
26.32
31.89
AdoMet||
-
-
A: 40.36B: 38.29
DTT
-
41.89
-
MES
-
48.20
50.91
Ethylene glycol
61.54
50.68
54.36
Water
53.85
44.99
49.33
R.m.s deviations
Bond lengths (Å)
0.002
0.010
0.010
Bond angles (°)
0.50
1.176
1.306
Highest resolution shell is shown in parenthesis
Bijvoet pairs were not merged during data processing
Value was not reported in the version of scalepack used for
scaling
Structure was not refined to completion
B-factors for two orientations of AdoMet refined at
occupancy=0.5 are listed (A=non-radical competent and
B=radical competent). When the B-factors are set at 35, the
occupancy of each orientation refines to A=0.46 and
B=0.54, and when the B-factors are set at 30, the occupancy of
each orientation refines to A=0.47 and B=0.53.
Figure 2
Structure of OxsB. The monomer contains four domains: an N-terminal domain of
unknown function (domain I, yellow), a Rossmann fold that houses Cbl (domain II,
pink), a partial triose phosphate isomerase barrel AdoMet radical domain (domain
III, cyan), and a C-terminal helix bundle (domain IV, blue). See also Extended Data Fig. 6. Cbl in pink, AdoMet in
cyan, [4Fe-4S] cluster in orange/yellow.
Extended Data Figure 6
OxsB is organized into four modular domains
(a) A stereoview of the entire (744 amino acids)
monomer of OxsB colored by domain. The N-terminal domain is shown in yellow,
and is followed by the Cbl-binding domain displayed in pink, the AdoMet
radical domain, which is colored cyan, and the C-terminal helix bundle
domain displayed in blue. (b) A topology diagram of OxsB is
shown and colored similarly to panel a. The yellow sphere in domain II
represents the position of Asn186, which is the closest residue to the Co of
Cbl. (c) The two observed conformations of AdoMet (cyan and
wheat), Cbl, and the [4Fe-4S] AdoMet radical cluster (orange
and yellow spheres) are shown with simulated annealing composite omit
electron density maps contoured at 0.8 σ.
Cbl is bound to domain II, a Rossmann fold, which is similar (r.m.s.d of 3.10
Å for 565 atoms) to the Cbl-binding domain of methionine synthase (MetH)
despite sharing only 14% sequence identity. As in MetH[23], Cbl is bound to OxsB with its
dimethylbenzimidazole (DMB) base displaced (i.e. “base-off”) from Co
(Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 7). However, OxsB does not use the classic
“His-on” Cbl binding sequence motif (Asp-X-His-X-X-Gly) defined by
the MetH structure from which a His residue on the loop that follows β1
(II-β1 loop) replaces DMB as the lower ligand to Co[23]. In OxsB, the II-β1 loop has no His,
is fourteen residues long instead of six, and is flexible, changing conformations
between apo and Cbl-bound structures to cap the Cbl-binding site (Fig. 3b, Extended Fig.
8a). The closest protein residue to Co, Asn186, is too far
(6.4-Å) to serve as a lower ligand, but does make through water contacts to
Co (Fig. 3a). Surprisingly, Asn186 does not map
to the position of the His ligand in MetH[23], being found instead on a loop following II-β3 in
the sequence Ser184-Asn186. These residues align with the highly conserved MetH
residues Ser804-Leu806[23]. This Ser
interacts with N3 of DMB in MetH and OxsB, whereas Asn/Leu orients the lower ligand
of Cbl either by stacking (Leu/His in MetH)[23] or hydrogen bonding (Asn/H2O in OxsB) (Extended Data Fig. 7b–e)[23]. A water molecule (or hydroxide
ion) also appears to ligate Co on the upper face of the OxsB Cbl (Extended Fig. 6c), generating a hexacoordinate form of the
cofactor typically associated with a Co(III)-Cbl oxidation state[24]. This base-off, His-off mode of Cbl-binding
is unlikely to be unique to OxsB given that the Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical
methylase, TsrM, was reported to also bind Cbl base-off, His-off[19].
Figure 3
A new mode of Cbl binding. (a) Cbl (pink) interacts with residues in
the OxsB Cbl-binding (pink) and AdoMet radical (cyan) domains. (b)
Cbl in MetH (green) and OxsB (pink) have different positions. The OxsB AdoMet
radical [4Fe-4S] cluster is shown as spheres. (c)
Cbl-dependent diol dehydratase[36] (yellow) and AdoMet radical enzyme biotin
synthase[37] (blue)
position cofactors at the C-terminal ends of barrels. (d) An
overlay of the TIM barrel β-strands of OxsB with biotin synthase places
the [4Fe-4S] clusters in similar postions and showcases a new
Cbl position.
Extended Data Figure 7
Cbl interactions in OxsB and comparison to MetH
(a) A stereoview of an overlay of the MetH[23] Cbl-binding domain (green)
with the Cbl-binding domain of OxsB (pink) shows differences in the length
of the II-β1 loop, which for OxsB lacks a His residue to ligate Cbl,
and the positioning of the Cbl cofactor’s corrin ring.
(b) Residues from the Cbl-binding domain of OxsB that
accommodate or make contacts to the DMB tail and corrin ring of Cbl are
highlighted and shown as sticks. Residues Gly216 are Ser184 are from the
base-off consensus sequence and residues R135–S139 are located on
the II-β1 loop. (c) Residues from the Cbl-binding
domain of MetH[23] that
interact with Cbl, or make room for the DMB tail are highlighted and shown
as sticks. (d) Residues from Figure panels b and c that make
contacts to Cbl from the Cbl-binding domains of MetH (top panel) and OxsB
(bottom panel) are shown. Residues highlighted in pink are previously
identified sequence fingerprints of MetH that have a conserved interaction
in OxsB. Residues highlighted in blue are conserved interactions between Cbl
and MetH or OxsB, which are not from the standard Cbl-binding motifs.
Residues shown in black form interactions with Cbl, but are not conserved
between the proteins. (e) Stereoview of the contacts that Cbl
makes with the Cbl-binding (pink) and AdoMet radical (cyan) domains of OxsB.
All of the residues that form interactions with Cbl are highlighted as
sticks, but only residues from the AdoMe radical domain are labeled for
clarity.
Extended Data Figure 8
Structural comparisons of apo-OxsB,
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet, and PFL-AE
(a–d) Small conformational changes occur in the
reconstituted structures relative to the apo-structure. The r.m.s.d
determined by PyMOL for the
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet structure compared to
the apo structure is 0.98 Å for 4770 atoms. (a) The
II-β1 loop of the Cbl-binding domain in the reconstituted OxsB
structures swings outward 12.9-Å to avoid steric clashes with the
corrin ring of Cbl and now caps the side of the Cbl. (b,c) In
the absence of a [4Fe-4S] cluster, the Cys residues of the
cluster-binding loop in the apo-structure are oriented similarly to those in
the reconstituted structure. Cys318 and Cys321 in the apo-structure,
however, exhibit a partial occupancy disulfide linkage. At the end of the
cluster binding loop, there are more substantial differences between the
structures; His325 and Lys326 of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet move 8.0- and
8.8-Å, respectively, from their positions in the apo-structure to
interact with the nucleotide tail of Cbl. (d) An overlay of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet (light colors) with
apo-OxsB (dark colors) shows slight movements in each domain. The arrow
indicates closing in of the helix bundle domain towards the cofactors.
(e) A surface representation of OxsB reveals the open and
solvent accessible nature of the active site in
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet. Water molecules are
shown as red spheres. (f) Location of polar and aromatic
residues near the active site. Presumably, positively charged residues are
needed to accommodate the negatively charged phosphate moieties of substrate
and an aromatic residue may stack with substrate adenine. (g)
An overlay of the β-strands from the AdoMet radical domains of OxsB
(cyan) with those from a peptide-bound (green) stucture of PFL-AE[25] (gray) was used to map the
approximate substrate binding site in OxsB. The yellow sphere, which
corresponds to the Cα of the substrate peptide Gly residue, is
3.7-Å away from the 5′-carbon of AdoMet and 3.7-Å
away from Co of Cbl.
Overall, modifications to the Cbl-binding domain of OxsB, including the
extended II-β1 loop and the absence of a protein-based ligand to Co, result
in a shift of the corrin ring approximately 5-Å from the observed position
in MetH and closer to the [4Fe-4S] cluster (Fig. 3b). This position of the OxsBcorrin ring is
approximately 90° away from the standard orientation of a corrin ring with
respect to a TIM barrel; Cbl-enzymes typically position the corrin ring directly on
top of the C-terminal end of a barrel in the same position that
[4Fe-4S] clusters of AdoMet radical enzymes are found (Fig. 3c,d). Here we have an enzyme that
accommodates both cofactors, and we find that the [4Fe-4S] cluster
is in the standard position at the top of a partial TIM barrel, whereas Cbl has a
novel position (Fig. 3d).
Expanded AdoMet fold accommodates Cbl
Comparison of OxsB with a classic AdoMet radical core fold exemplified by
E. coli pyruvate-formate lyase activating enzyme
(PFL-AE)[25], shows an
outward displacement of β-strands and helices such that the partial TIM
barrel fold of OxsB is now large enough to accommodate Cbl (Fig. 4a). All previously described motifs for AdoMet and
cluster binding[26,27] remain intact, albeit with a few notable
variations in both their function and structure. For example, in addition to
coordinating the [4Fe-4S] cluster, residues of Cys-rich loop
(Pro322, His325, and Lys326 of
C313DYSRC318TFC321PRDHK326)
also make contacts with Cbl (Fig. 3a). His325
and Lys326, in particular, move 8.0- and 8.8-Å, respectively, from their
positions in the apo-structure to hydrogen bond to Cbl (Extended Data Fig. 8b, c). Similarly, a residue of the
“GGE” AdoMet binding motif (Ala361-Glu363) has taken on an auxiliary
role; in addition to providing a backbone carbonyl to hydrogen bond with the amino
group of AdoMet, the side-chain of Glu363 also interacts with an acetamide moiety of
Cbl, tethering Cbl near the [4Fe-4S] cluster (Fig. 3c, Extended Data
7e). Thus, two classic AdoMet radical motifs serve to hold the
[4Fe-4S] cluster, AdoMet and Cbl close to each other in OxsB.
Figure 4
An expanded AdoMet radical domain in OxsB. (a) Comparison of OxsB
(cyan) and PFL-AE[25] (gray)
reveals OxsB has has additional α-helices (α6a,
α6b, 310, α6*) and a more open
barrel due to displacement of III-β1, III-α1, III-β2,
and III-α2. (b) AdoMet binding motifs are conserved in
OxsB. Also see Extended Data Fig. 9a.
(c) AdoMet binds to OxsB in two orientations. (d)
One AdoMet orientation is not poised for electron transfer (wheat), whereas the
other conformation appears radical-competent (cyan). (e) The
non-radical-competent orientation places the methyl group close to Co.
(f) The putative substrate-binding site of OxsB (yellow).
The most substantial variation in an AdoMet radical motif is the replacement
of β6 with a long loop. This loop connecting the 310 helix to
III-α6* lies approximately where β6 ends in PFL-AE, and like
β6 in PFL-AE contributes two hydrogen bonds to the AdoMetadenine ring
fulfilling the AdoMet binding function (Fig. 4a,
b). AdoMet radical enzyme BtrN[28] also uses a loop replacement for a missing β6, but
in this case, the loop follows β5 with no intervening helices.
Interestingly, OxsB has higher overall structural homology to PFL-AE than BtrN (DALI
server[29]), suggesting loss
of β6 may have happened more than once.Domain III concludes with a 25-residue loop that follows
III-α6* (Fig. 4a) and serves to
partially bury the [4Fe-4S] cluster. Even with this loop, however,
the active-site is quite open (Extended Data Fig.
8d–f). We suspect that once substrate binds, a conformational
change will close the active-site. A comparison of apo- and holo-OxsB structures
reveals the helix bundle domain can swing towards the active-site as occurs in
MetH[23,30,31]
(Extended Data Fig. 8d).
AdoMet samples different conformations
AdoMet binds to the [4Fe-4S] cluster in two conformations,
which differ by a 4.0-Å shift in the position of the AdoMetsulfur atom
(Fig. 4c, Extended Data Fig. 9). In one conformation, the
“radical-competent conformation”, the S atom of AdoMet is
3.0-Å away from the [4Fe-4S] cluster (Fig. 4d), comparable to the average 3.4-Å S to Fe
distance seen in other AdoMet radical enzymes that permits reductive cleavage of
AdoMet[27]. In the second
orientation, AdoMet does not engage with the GGE motif and does not appear competent
to perform radical chemistry as the S atom is 6.5-Å away from the cluster
(Fig. 4d). Instead, this binding mode
places AdoMet approximately where one would expect it to bind to methylate Cbl; the
methyl is 5.8-Å from Co (Fig. 4e), a
similar distance to that found in the reactivation complex of MetH[32]. As OxsB does not catalyze a
methylation reaction, this second AdoMet conformation is unlikely to be
catalytically relevant. However, it could represent an orientation sampled to
minimize uncoupled AdoMet cleavage. Regardless, these structural data on OxsB show
that the active site of a Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme is designed such that
two AdoMet binding modes can be populated, one in which AdoMet is positioned for
radical chemistry and one in which the methyl group of AdoMet is close to Co.
Indeed, recent studies[19,20] performed on TsrM describe a new mode of
AdoMet binding; AdoMet binds close to the [4Fe-4S] cluster, but not
with traditional coordination through either the amino or carboxylate moieties.
Extended Data Figure 9
AdoMet interactions
(a) A stereoview of the AdoMet radical domain of OxsB.
Each of the AdoMet radical motifs[26,27] is
highlighted including the GGE (E363), ribose (E436), GXIXGXXE (I474), and
the β6 (adenine-binding) motif (E545). The GGE motif provides a
carbonyl to hydrogen bond with the amino moiety of AdoMet. In OxsB, E363
also contacts a Cbl acetamide. The ribose motif is found at the C-terminal
loop following III-β4 where Glu436 forms two hydrogen bonds with the
AdoMet ribose hydroxyl moieties. In the same loop, two residues upstream,
the backbone amide of Gly434 contributes a hydrogen bond to the carboxyl
group of AdoMet. Following a short III-α4a helix that connects
III-β4 and III-α4, Lys448 interacts with the AdoMet
carboxylate similar to what was previously observed in QueE[60], HemN[61], HydE[62], PylB[63], anSMEcpe[64], and BtrN[28]. In terms of the GXIXGXXE motif,
Ile474 from a loop following III-β5 provides hydrophobic contacts to
the adenine ring of AdoMet as observed previously. However, instead of the
backbone of Ile474 being stabilized by a polar residue on III-α5, as
found in other AdoMet radical enzymes, the backbone of Ile474 is stabilized
through interactions with the side chains of Gln442 and Tyr446 from
III-α4a and the backbone of ribose motif residue Glu436. The final
motif, the so-called β6 motif, is present although β6 is
not. A loop substitutes for β6, with backbone atoms of E545 making
hydrogen bonds to the adenine ring of AdoMet. Additional residues F320,
M544, I546, and L547 that provide hydrophobic interactions to the adenine
ring of AdoMet and a hydrogen bond to N6 are also shown. (b) A
2F(o)–F(c) simulated annealing composite omit electron density map
contoured at 1.0 σ around the AdoMet radical
[4Fe-4S] cluster. (c) The
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet ligates the unique
Fe of the AdoMet radical [4Fe-4S] cluster, which is shown
rotated ~90° from panel b. The distance between the unique Fe and
the AdoMet amino and carboxylate moieties measure 2.2 Å each.
(d) The non-radical competent orientation also ligates the
AdoMet radical [4Fe-4S] cluster with the amino and
carboxylate moieties. These distances measure 2.3- and 2.0 Å,
respectively. (e) A 2F(o)–F(c) simulated annealing
composite omit electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ around the
two orientations of AdoMet. (f) A simulated annealing composite
omit electron density map calculated after the
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet was omitted from
the refined structure of OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet.
This map is contoured at ±3.0 σ around the
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet. (g)
A similar simulated annealing composite omit electron density map was
calculated after the “non-radical competent” orientation of
AdoMet was omitted from the refined structure of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet. This map is also
contoured at ±3.0 σ around the observed AdoMet
conformation.
Although we do not have OxsB structures with substrate bound, structures of
other AdoMet radical enzymes show that substrate sits in the lateral opening of the
barrel such that the site of hydrogen atom abstraction is 3.7–4.0 Å
from the 5′ position of AdoMet[27]. Using the substrate-bound structure of PFL-AE[25] as a guide, we can map the
approximate site of hydrogen-atom abstraction to a position in OxsB that is
equidistant from the 5′-carbon of AdoMet (the radical-competent orientation)
and Co of Cbl (Fig. 4f, Extended Data Fig. 8g). This close juxtaposition of the
putative substrate-binding site to both cofactors (3.7-Å in both cases)
suggests that a hydrogen-atom abstraction step catalyzed by 5′-dAdo•
could be followed by a Cbl-dependent reaction without any movement of the substrate
or protein. Thus, OxsB may use two common strategies of radical enzymes: a
conformational change seals an open active site prior to radical generation, and an
arrangement of cofactors that limits the need for conformational changes once highly
reactive radical intermediates are formed.
Proposed mechanisms for OXT-A synthesis
The above structural and biochemical data support the involvement of
Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical chemistry in formation of the four-membered ring of
OXT-A from phosphorylated forms of deoxyadenosine, thereby taking advantage of
prevalent compounds in the cell (Fig. 1d, 5). Based on the deuterium labeling experiments,
catalysis is likely initiated via hydrogen atom abstraction from C2′ of
dAMP, dADP or dATP by 5′-dAdo•. Rearrangement of the resulting
substrate radical (4) to the product radical (6) may
proceed via an intermediate enol radical
(4→5→6) (Fig. 5), analogous to the Cbl-dependent mutases[33]. Steps
4→6 are expected to be thermodynamically
unfavorable due to contraction of a five-membered furanosyl ring to an oxetanyl
ring. Coupling of this unfavorable reaction to the favorable OxsA phosphate
hydrolysis reaction could shift the equilibrium toward product. Additionally, Cbl
could play a role in lowering the activation energy barrier for these steps, either
through a direct or indirect coordination of a substrate-bound radical. Steps
6 → 2 require an electron acceptor, and Cbl is
one possible acceptor; formation of a Cbl-product radical complex could provide a
conduit by which the unpaired electron in 6 is transferred to Cob(II)
to form 2 and Cob(I). Subsequent electron transfer from Cob(I) to
[4Fe-4S]2+ would reset the redox state of the
catalytic center. Alternatively, an external electron acceptor could be
involved[34], or
[4Fe-4S]2+ could accept the electron from
6 as has been proposed for DesII[35]. Finally, the aldehyde product
2 is converted to 3 by a cellular component, which
along with dephosphorylation by OxsA completes OXT-A production.
Figure 5
Mechanistic proposal for generation of OXT-A aldehyde 2.
Discussion
This work confirms that oxsA and oxsB are
the essential OXT-A biosynthetic genes; we show here that OxsB uses AdoMet radical
chemistry to catalyze ring contraction of a deoxyadenosine phosphate and recently
showed that OxsA catalyzes hydrolysis of the resulting phosphorylated OXT-A
compounds[22]. Although we
do not know the roles of the remaining two genes located within the OXT-A gene
cluster, our genetic experiments confirm that they are not required for OXT-A
production. We suspect that oxrA and oxrB are
resistance genes in agreement with their annotation. However, it is interesting to
consider why resistance genes are necessary in light of our observation that OxsB
requires OxsA for activity. The coupling of the two enzyme activities in itself
protects the producing organism from the toxic phosphorylated forms of OXT-A; OxsB
does not produce phosphorylated OXT-A unless OxsA can dephosphorylate and render the
compound inert. However, OXT-A must be quickly exported before endogenous kinases
can re-phosphorylate the compound. We hypothesize that the gene products of
oxrA and oxrB represent the organism’s safety net if
export is hindered.We further demonstrate that OxsB catalysis requires Cbl, although the exact
role of Cbl in this nonmethylase is not yet clear. The fact that the apo-OxsB
structure is almost identical (0.98 Å r.m.s.d) to holo-OxsB argues against a
structural role for Cbl, and the location of Cbl in the OxsB active site is
certainly consistent with a catalytic one. The OxsB structure reveals adaptions of
both the classic AdoMet radical and Cbl motifs that result in the adjacent
positioning of cofactors in the active site. These structural features may have
evolved to allow for AdoMet radical-mediated Cbl-methylation, and may have been
appropriated to assist in OxsB’s complex radical-rearrangement, with Cbl
retained to facilitate rearrangement or to accept an electron. The latter
possibility would seem to be a mundane use for a cofactor that requires 30 enzymes
in its biosynthesis.We still have much to learn about the approximately 7000 enzymes that
comprise the Cbl-dependent AdoMet radical enzyme superfamily. Already, with only a
handful of these enzymes characterized, an impressive list of functions has emerged,
ranging from production of antiviral compounds to bacteriochlorophylls. Outside of
this enzyme family, there is no precedent for radical-based methylation, or for any
of the functions suggested here for Cbl of OxsB. Thus, regardless of the mechanistic
details that emerge, new chemical territory will be charted as we continue to
explore this impressive enzyme family.
Putative substrates tested in the OxsB and OxsA/OxsB reactions
Reductants used to test these substrates were sodium dithionite,
hexa-ammineruthenium(II) chloride, NADPH/methylviologen, titanium(III)
citrate/methyl viologen, and a flavodoxin/flavodoxin-NADPH reductase
system[35,47,48].
In vivo gene expression and HPLC analysis reveal oxsA
and oxsB are required for OXT-A biosynthesis
(a) To probe which genes located within the
BglII-D fragment are responsible for OXT-A (chemical
structure shown in left panel) production, B. megaterium
NRS 269 was transformed using the E. coli-Bacillus shuttle
vector pMM1522. (b) In vivo product profiles of B.
megaterium NRS 269 strains. (i) transformed with pMM1522 empty
vector (as a control); (ii) transformed with pMM1522 that contains the
BglII-D (oxsA, oxsB, oxrA, oxrB)
fragment. (c) In vivo product profiles of B. megaterium
NRS 269 strains. (i) carrying only oxsB; (ii)
carrying both oxsA and oxsB; (iii)
carrying only oxsA.
Enzymatic production of OXT-A
HPLC analysis in panel a was performed using a CarboPac PA1 Dionex
column whereas a C18 column was used in panels c–e. (a)
HPLC analysis of the reactions catalyzed by OxsA and OxsB using dAMP, dADP,
or dATP as substrate. (i) incubation with reconstituted OxsB and OxsA with
dAMP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV (full reaction, see
Methods for details); (ii) full reaction without OxsB; (iii) full reaction
without OxsA; (iv) full reaction without dAMP; (v) full reaction without
AdoMet; (vi) full reaction without HO-Cbl; (vii) full reaction without the
reductants NADPH and MV; (viii) full reaction substituted with dADP instead
of dAMP; (ix) full reaction substituted with dATP instead of dAMP.
(b) MS spectrum (ESI positive) used to confirm the identity
of compound 2 as the corresponding aldehyde of OXT-A
5′-monophosphate. MS of the aldehyde compound was performed
following treatment of the reaction mixture with CIP and purification by
HPLC. (c) HPLC analysis confirms that reduction of compound
2 results in formation of OXT-A-P (3). (i)
isolated 2; (ii) isolated 2 treated with
NaBD4; (iii) co-injection of 2 treated with
NaBD4 with a chemically synthesized standard of
3; (iv) standard of 3. (d) Direct formation of
OXT-A is observed when cell extract is included in the reaction conditions.
(i) HPLC analysis after incubation of reconstituted OxsB with OxsA, dATP,
DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV, and cell extract of
B. megaterium NRS 269 (full reaction); (ii) full
reaction without OxsB; (iii) full reaction without OxsA; (iv) full reaction
without dATP; (v) full reaction without AdoMet; (vi) full reaction without
MgCl2; (vii) full reaction without cell extract; (viii) OXT-A
(1) standard. (e) Direct formation of OXT-A
can also be observed when alcohol dehydrogenase is included in the reaction
mixture. (i) HPLC analysis after incubation with reconstituted OxsB and OxsA
with dATP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2, NADPH, MV and horse liver
alcohol dehydrogenase (full reaction); (ii) full reaction without OxsA and
OxsB; (iii) OXT-A standard.
Characterization of OxsB as an AdoMet radical enzyme
(a) Consistent with its classification as an AdoMetradical enzyme, OxsB catalyzes the reductive cleavage of AdoMet to generate
5′-dAdoH. HPLC analysis (C18 column, 2–20%
CH3CN in 1% NH4OAc linear gradient
elution) of reaction catalyzed by OxsA and OxsB. (i) Reaction of
reconstituted OxsB with OxsA, dAMP, DTT, AdoMet, HO-Cbl, MgCl2,
NADPH, MV (full reaction, see Methods for details); (ii) full reaction
without dAMP; (iii) 5′-dAdoH standard. (b) MS spectrum
(ESI positive) of 5′-dAdoH generated in the OxsA and OxsB reaction
using [2′-2H2]-2′-dAMP
as substrate shows incorporation of the deuterium label into
5′-dAdoH and thus indicates hydrogen atom abstraction occurs at
C2′. The less than full deuterium incorporation is likely due to the
co-occurrence of uncoupled quenching of 5′-dAdo•, a common
phenomenon in many AdoMet radical enzymes[59]. (c) MS spectrum (ESI
positive) of OXT-A (1) generated in the OxsA and OxsB reaction
using [3′-2H]-2′-dAMP as
substrate, which shows retention of the deuterium label in product, again
consistent with hydrogen atom abstraction at C2′.
OxsB is organized into four modular domains
(a) A stereoview of the entire (744 amino acids)
monomer of OxsB colored by domain. The N-terminal domain is shown in yellow,
and is followed by the Cbl-binding domain displayed in pink, the AdoMetradical domain, which is colored cyan, and the C-terminal helix bundle
domain displayed in blue. (b) A topology diagram of OxsB is
shown and colored similarly to panel a. The yellow sphere in domain II
represents the position of Asn186, which is the closest residue to the Co of
Cbl. (c) The two observed conformations of AdoMet (cyan and
wheat), Cbl, and the [4Fe-4S] AdoMet radical cluster (orange
and yellow spheres) are shown with simulated annealing composite omit
electron density maps contoured at 0.8 σ.
Cbl interactions in OxsB and comparison to MetH
(a) A stereoview of an overlay of the MetH[23] Cbl-binding domain (green)
with the Cbl-binding domain of OxsB (pink) shows differences in the length
of the II-β1 loop, which for OxsB lacks a His residue to ligate Cbl,
and the positioning of the Cbl cofactor’s corrin ring.
(b) Residues from the Cbl-binding domain of OxsB that
accommodate or make contacts to the DMB tail and corrin ring of Cbl are
highlighted and shown as sticks. Residues Gly216 are Ser184 are from the
base-off consensus sequence and residues R135–S139 are located on
the II-β1 loop. (c) Residues from the Cbl-binding
domain of MetH[23] that
interact with Cbl, or make room for the DMB tail are highlighted and shown
as sticks. (d) Residues from Figure panels b and c that make
contacts to Cbl from the Cbl-binding domains of MetH (top panel) and OxsB
(bottom panel) are shown. Residues highlighted in pink are previously
identified sequence fingerprints of MetH that have a conserved interaction
in OxsB. Residues highlighted in blue are conserved interactions between Cbl
and MetH or OxsB, which are not from the standard Cbl-binding motifs.
Residues shown in black form interactions with Cbl, but are not conserved
between the proteins. (e) Stereoview of the contacts that Cbl
makes with the Cbl-binding (pink) and AdoMet radical (cyan) domains of OxsB.
All of the residues that form interactions with Cbl are highlighted as
sticks, but only residues from the AdoMe radical domain are labeled for
clarity.
Structural comparisons of apo-OxsB,
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet, and PFL-AE
(a–d) Small conformational changes occur in the
reconstituted structures relative to the apo-structure. The r.m.s.d
determined by PyMOL for the
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet structure compared to
the apo structure is 0.98 Å for 4770 atoms. (a) The
II-β1 loop of the Cbl-binding domain in the reconstituted OxsB
structures swings outward 12.9-Å to avoid steric clashes with the
corrin ring of Cbl and now caps the side of the Cbl. (b,c) In
the absence of a [4Fe-4S] cluster, the Cys residues of the
cluster-binding loop in the apo-structure are oriented similarly to those in
the reconstituted structure. Cys318 and Cys321 in the apo-structure,
however, exhibit a partial occupancy disulfide linkage. At the end of the
cluster binding loop, there are more substantial differences between the
structures; His325 and Lys326 of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet move 8.0- and
8.8-Å, respectively, from their positions in the apo-structure to
interact with the nucleotide tail of Cbl. (d) An overlay of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet (light colors) with
apo-OxsB (dark colors) shows slight movements in each domain. The arrow
indicates closing in of the helix bundle domain towards the cofactors.
(e) A surface representation of OxsB reveals the open and
solvent accessible nature of the active site in
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet. Water molecules are
shown as red spheres. (f) Location of polar and aromatic
residues near the active site. Presumably, positively charged residues are
needed to accommodate the negatively charged phosphate moieties of substrate
and an aromatic residue may stack with substrate adenine. (g)
An overlay of the β-strands from the AdoMet radical domains of OxsB
(cyan) with those from a peptide-bound (green) stucture of PFL-AE[25] (gray) was used to map the
approximate substrate binding site in OxsB. The yellow sphere, which
corresponds to the Cα of the substrate peptide Gly residue, is
3.7-Å away from the 5′-carbon of AdoMet and 3.7-Å
away from Co of Cbl.
AdoMet interactions
(a) A stereoview of the AdoMet radical domain of OxsB.
Each of the AdoMet radical motifs[26,27] is
highlighted including the GGE (E363), ribose (E436), GXIXGXXE (I474), and
the β6 (adenine-binding) motif (E545). The GGE motif provides a
carbonyl to hydrogen bond with the amino moiety of AdoMet. In OxsB, E363
also contacts a Cbl acetamide. The ribose motif is found at the C-terminal
loop following III-β4 where Glu436 forms two hydrogen bonds with the
AdoMetribose hydroxyl moieties. In the same loop, two residues upstream,
the backbone amide of Gly434 contributes a hydrogen bond to the carboxyl
group of AdoMet. Following a short III-α4a helix that connects
III-β4 and III-α4, Lys448 interacts with the AdoMetcarboxylate similar to what was previously observed in QueE[60], HemN[61], HydE[62], PylB[63], anSMEcpe[64], and BtrN[28]. In terms of the GXIXGXXE motif,
Ile474 from a loop following III-β5 provides hydrophobic contacts to
the adenine ring of AdoMet as observed previously. However, instead of the
backbone of Ile474 being stabilized by a polar residue on III-α5, as
found in other AdoMet radical enzymes, the backbone of Ile474 is stabilized
through interactions with the side chains of Gln442 and Tyr446 from
III-α4a and the backbone of ribose motif residue Glu436. The final
motif, the so-called β6 motif, is present although β6 is
not. A loop substitutes for β6, with backbone atoms of E545 making
hydrogen bonds to the adenine ring of AdoMet. Additional residues F320,
M544, I546, and L547 that provide hydrophobic interactions to the adenine
ring of AdoMet and a hydrogen bond to N6 are also shown. (b) A
2F(o)–F(c) simulated annealing composite omit electron density map
contoured at 1.0 σ around the AdoMet radical
[4Fe-4S] cluster. (c) The
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet ligates the unique
Fe of the AdoMet radical [4Fe-4S] cluster, which is shown
rotated ~90° from panel b. The distance between the unique Fe and
the AdoMet amino and carboxylate moieties measure 2.2 Å each.
(d) The non-radical competent orientation also ligates the
AdoMet radical [4Fe-4S] cluster with the amino and
carboxylate moieties. These distances measure 2.3- and 2.0 Å,
respectively. (e) A 2F(o)–F(c) simulated annealing
composite omit electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ around the
two orientations of AdoMet. (f) A simulated annealing composite
omit electron density map calculated after the
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet was omitted from
the refined structure of OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet.
This map is contoured at ±3.0 σ around the
“radical-competent” orientation of AdoMet. (g)
A similar simulated annealing composite omit electron density map was
calculated after the “non-radical competent” orientation of
AdoMet was omitted from the refined structure of
OxsBCbl/[4Fe-4S]/AdoMet. This map is also
contoured at ±3.0 σ around the observed AdoMet
conformation.Data collection and refinement statistics of OxsBHighest resolution shell is shown in parenthesisBijvoet pairs were not merged during data processingValue was not reported in the version of scalepack used for
scalingStructure was not refined to completionB-factors for two orientations of AdoMet refined at
occupancy=0.5 are listed (A=non-radical competent and
B=radical competent). When the B-factors are set at 35, the
occupancy of each orientation refines to A=0.46 and
B=0.54, and when the B-factors are set at 30, the occupancy of
each orientation refines to A=0.47 and B=0.53.
Authors: Anutthaman Parthasarathy; Troy A Stich; Svenja T Lohner; Ann Lesnefsky; R David Britt; Alfred M Spormann Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jessica L Vey; Jian Yang; Meng Li; William E Broderick; Joan B Broderick; Catherine L Drennan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hak Joong Kim; Reid M McCarty; Yasushi Ogasawara; Yung-nan Liu; Steven O Mansoorabadi; Jake LeVieux; Hung-wen Liu Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: John C Evans; Donald P Huddler; Mark T Hilgers; Gail Romanchuk; Rowena G Matthews; Martha L Ludwig Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-01-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anthony J Blaszczyk; Alexey Silakov; Bo Zhang; Stephanie J Maiocco; Nicholas D Lanz; Wendy L Kelly; Sean J Elliott; Carsten Krebs; Squire J Booker Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Christoph Kieninger; Klaus Wurst; Maren Podewitz; Maria Stanley; Evelyne Deery; Andrew D Lawrence; Klaus R Liedl; Martin J Warren; Bernhard Kräutler Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-09-02 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Nicholas D Lanz; Anthony J Blaszczyk; Erin L McCarthy; Bo Wang; Roy X Wang; Brianne S Jones; Squire J Booker Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Felix J Elling; Jordon D Hemingway; Thomas W Evans; Jenan J Kharbush; Eva Spieck; Roger E Summons; Ann Pearson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205