Literature DB >> 28327464

Monte Carlo simulations of time-of-flight PET with double-ended readout: calibration, coincidence resolving times and statistical lower bounds.

Stephen E Derenzo1.   

Abstract

This paper demonstrates through Monte Carlo simulations that a practical positron emission tomograph with (1) deep scintillators for efficient detection, (2) double-ended readout for depth-of-interaction information, (3) fixed-level analog triggering, and (4) accurate calibration and timing data corrections can achieve a coincidence resolving time (CRT) that is not far above the statistical lower bound. One Monte Carlo algorithm simulates a calibration procedure that uses data from a positron point source. Annihilation events with an interaction near the entrance surface of one scintillator are selected, and data from the two photodetectors on the other scintillator provide depth-dependent timing corrections. Another Monte Carlo algorithm simulates normal operation using these corrections and determines the CRT. A third Monte Carlo algorithm determines the CRT statistical lower bound by generating a series of random interaction depths, and for each interaction a set of random photoelectron times for each of the two photodetectors. The most likely interaction times are determined by shifting the depth-dependent probability density function to maximize the joint likelihood for all the photoelectron times in each set. Example calculations are tabulated for different numbers of photoelectrons and photodetector time jitters for three 3  ×  3  ×  30 mm3 scintillators: Lu2SiO5:Ce,Ca (LSO), LaBr3:Ce, and a hypothetical ultra-fast scintillator. To isolate the factors that depend on the scintillator length and the ability to estimate the DOI, CRT values are tabulated for perfect scintillator-photodetectors. For LSO with 4000 photoelectrons and single photoelectron time jitter of the photodetector J  =  0.2 ns (FWHM), the CRT value using the statistically weighted average of corrected trigger times is 0.098 ns FWHM and the statistical lower bound is 0.091 ns FWHM. For LaBr3:Ce with 8000 photoelectrons and J  =  0.2 ns FWHM, the CRT values are 0.070 and 0.063 ns FWHM, respectively. For the ultra-fast scintillator with 1 ns decay time, 4000 photoelectrons, and J  =  0.2 ns FWHM, the CRT values are 0.021 and 0.017 ns FWHM, respectively. The examples also show that calibration and correction for depth-dependent variations in pulse height and in annihilation and optical photon transit times are necessary to achieve these CRT values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28327464      PMCID: PMC5526073          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa6862

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Evaluation of Geiger-mode APDs for PET block detector designs.

Authors:  Armin Kolb; Eckart Lorenz; Martin S Judenhofer; Dieter Renker; Konrad Lankes; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Sub-100 ps coincidence time resolution for positron emission tomography with LSO:Ce codoped with Ca.

Authors:  Mythra Varun Nemallapudi; Stefan Gundacker; Paul Lecoq; Etiennette Auffray; Alessandro Ferri; Alberto Gola; Claudio Piemonte
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  The lower timing resolution bound for scintillators with non-negligible optical photon transport time in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Ruud Vinke; Peter D Olcott; Joshua W Cates; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Effects of reflector and crystal surface on the performance of a depth-encoding PET detector with dual-ended readout.

Authors:  Silin Ren; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Emission computer assisted tomography with single-photon and positron annihilation photon emitters.

Authors:  T F Budinger; S E Derenzo; G T Gullberg; W L Greenberg; R H Huesman
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Improvement in lesion detection with whole-body oncologic time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Suleman Surti; Cathryn M Trott; Joshua Scheuermann; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Fisher information-based evaluation of image quality for time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Kathleen Vunckx; Lin Zhou; Samuel Matej; Michel Defrise; Johan Nuyts
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Optimizing timing performance of silicon photomultiplier-based scintillation detectors.

Authors:  Jung Yeol Yeom; Ruud Vinke; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dual-ended readout of bismuth germanate to improve timing resolution in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Emilie Roncali; Alberto Gola; Giovanni Paternoster; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.