| Literature DB >> 29280394 |
Ji-Bin Li1,2, Joseph T F Lau2,3, Phoenix K H Mo2,3, Xue-Fen Su2,3, Jie Tang4, Zu-Guo Qin4, Danielle L Gross2.
Abstract
Background and aims This study aims to examine the mediating effects of insomnia on the associations between problematic Internet use, including Internet addiction (IA) and online social networking addiction (OSNA), and depression among adolescents. Methods A total of 1,015 secondary school students from Guangzhou in China participated in a cross-sectional survey. Levels of depression, insomnia, IA, and OSNA were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Young's Diagnostic Questionnaire, and Online Social Networking Addiction Scale, respectively. Logistic regression models were fit to test the associations between IA, OSNA, insomnia, and depression. The mediation effects of insomnia were tested using Baron and Kenny's strategy. Results The prevalence of depression at moderate level or above (CES-D ≥ 21), insomnia, IA, and OSNA were 23.5%, 37.2%, 8.1%, and 25.5%, respectively. IA and OSNA were significantly associated with depression (IA: AOR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.71, 4.55; OSNA: AOR = 3.27, 95% CI: 2.33, 4.59) and insomnia (IA: AOR = 2.83, 95% CI: 1.72, 4.65; OSNA: AOR = 2.19, 95% CI: 1.61, 2.96), after adjusting for significant background factors. Furthermore, insomnia partially mediated 60.6% of the effect of IA on depression (Sobel Z = 3.562, p < .002) and 44.8% of the effect of OSNA on depression (Sobel Z = 3.919, p < .001), respectively. Discussion The high prevalence of IA and OSNA may be associated with increased risk of developing depression among adolescents, both through direct and indirect effects (via insomnia). Findings from this study indicated that it may be effective to develop and implement interventions that jointly consider the problematic Internet use, insomnia, and depression.Entities:
Keywords: Internet addiction; depression; insomnia; mediation; online social networking addiction
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29280394 PMCID: PMC6034947 DOI: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Behav Addict ISSN: 2062-5871 Impact factor: 6.756
Sample characteristics (n = 1,015)
| % | ||
|---|---|---|
| Social-demographic variables | ||
| Gender | ||
| Female | 418 | 41.2 |
| Male | 597 | 58.8 |
| School district | ||
| Urban | 464 | 45.7 |
| Rural | 551 | 54.3 |
| Grade | ||
| Seven | 447 | 44.0 |
| Eight | 399 | 39.3 |
| Nine | 169 | 16.7 |
| Father’s education level | ||
| Primary school or below | 157 | 15.5 |
| Junior high school | 510 | 50.3 |
| Senior high school | 234 | 23.1 |
| University or above | 72 | 7.1 |
| Unknown | 42 | 4.1 |
| Mother’s education level | ||
| Primary school or below | 212 | 20.9 |
| Junior high school | 483 | 47.6 |
| Senior high school | 217 | 21.4 |
| University or above | 56 | 5.5 |
| Unknown | 47 | 4.6 |
| Perceived family financial situation | ||
| Very good/good | 366 | 36.1 |
| Medium | 609 | 60.0 |
| Very poor/poor | 40 | 3.9 |
| Smartphone ownership | ||
| No | 402 | 39.6 |
| Yes | 613 | 60.4 |
| School-related variables | ||
| Academic performance | ||
| Upper | 224 | 22.1 |
| Medium | 565 | 55.7 |
| Lower | 226 | 22.3 |
| Perceived study pressure | ||
| No/little | 118 | 11.6 |
| General | 570 | 56.2 |
| Heavy/very heavy | 327 | 32.2 |
| PSQI components | ||
| Subjective sleep quality | ||
| Very good/good | 811 | 79.9 |
| Poor/very poor | 204 | 20.1 |
| Sleep duration | ||
| >7 hr | 702 | 69.2 |
| 5–7 hr | 233 | 23.0 |
| <5 hr | 80 | 7.8 |
| Habitual sleep efficiency | ||
| >85% | 816 | 80.4 |
| 65%–85% | 87 | 8.6 |
| <65% | 112 | 11.0 |
| Sleep medicine use | ||
| No, during the last month | 985 | 97.0 |
| Yes, during the last month | 30 | 3.0 |
| Sleep latency | 0.86 ± 0.85 | |
| Sleep disturbance | 0.93 ± 0.55 | |
| Daytime dysfunction | 1.38 ± 0.87 | |
| Insomnia (defined as PSQI > 5) | ||
| No | 637 | 62.8 |
| Yes | 378 | 37.2 |
| Level of Internet use | ||
| No Internet use | 33 | 3.3 |
| Non-IA | 900 | 88.6 |
| IA (defined as YDQ > 5) | 82 | 8.1 |
| Level of OSN use | ||
| No OSN use | 105 | 10.3 |
| Non-OSNA | 651 | 64.1 |
| OSNA (defined as score in 4th quartile) | 259 | 25.5 |
| Depression | ||
| No (CES-D < 16) | 597 | 58.8 |
| Mild (CES-D ≥ 16 and CES-D < 21) | 180 | 17.7 |
| Moderate (CES-D ≥ 21 and CES-D < 25) | 102 | 10.1 |
| Severe (CES-D ≥ 25) | 136 | 13.4 |
Note. OSN: online social networking; OSNA: online social networking addiction; IA: Internet addiction; PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; YDQ: Young’s Diagnostic Questionnaire; CES-D: Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale.
Continuous variables, presented by mean ± SD.
Background variables as factors of depression (n = 1,015)
| Depression | ORu (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| % | |||
| Social-demographic variables | |||
| Gender | |||
| Female | 90 | 21.5 | 1 |
| Male | 148 | 24.8 | 1.20 (0.89, 1.62) |
| School district | |||
| Urban | 96 | 20.7 | 1 |
| Rural | 142 | 25.8 | 1.33 (0.99, 1.79)† |
| Grade | |||
| Seven | 79 | 17.7 | 1 |
| Eight | 103 | 25.8 | 1.62 (1.17, 2.26)** |
| Nine | 56 | 33.1 | 2.31 (1.54, 3.45)*** |
| Father’s education level | |||
| Primary school or below | 45 | 15.5 | 1 |
| Junior high school | 116 | 50.3 | 0.73 (0.49, 1.10) |
| Senior high school | 54 | 23.1 | 0.75 (0.47, 1.18) |
| University or above | 16 | 7.1 | 0.71 (0.37, 1.37) |
| Unknown | 7 | 4.1 | 0.50 (0.21, 1.20) |
| Mother’s education level | |||
| Primary school or below | 54 | 20.9 | 1 |
| Junior high school | 115 | 47.6 | 0.91 (0.63, 1.33) |
| Senior high school | 44 | 21.4 | 0.74 (0.47, 1.17) |
| University or above | 14 | 5.5 | 0.98 (0.50, 1.92) |
| Unknown | 11 | 4.6 | 0.89 (0.43, 1.88) |
| Perceived family financial situation | |||
| Very good/good | 70 | 19.1 | 1 |
| Medium | 155 | 25.5 | 1.44 (1.05, 1.98)* |
| Very poor/poor | 13 | 32.5 | 2.04 (1.00, 4.15)* |
| Smartphone ownership | |||
| No | 75 | 18.7 | 1 |
| Yes | 163 | 26.6 | 1.58 (1.16, 2.15)** |
| School-related variables | |||
| Academic performance | |||
| Upper | 40 | 224 | 1 |
| Medium | 126 | 565 | 1.32 (0.89, 1.96) |
| Lower | 72 | 226 | 2.15 (1.38, 3.35)*** |
| Perceived study pressure | |||
| No/little | 20 | 17.0 | 1 |
| General | 98 | 17.2 | 1.02 (0.60, 1.73) |
| Heavy/very heavy | 120 | 36.7 | 2.84 (1.67, 4.83)*** |
Note. ORu: univariate odds ratios, obtained by univariate logistic regression models; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.
†p < .10. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.
Associations between OSNA/IA and insomnia among adolescents (n = 1,015)
| Insomnia | ORu (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | ||||
| OSNA | ||||
| Non-OSNA/no OSN use | 238 | 31.5 | 1 | 1 |
| OSNA | 140 | 54.1 | 2.56 (1.92, 3.42) | 2.19 (1.61, 2.96) |
| IA status | ||||
| Non-IA/no Internet use | 324 | 34.7 | 1 | 1 |
| IA | 54 | 65.9 | 3.69 (2.27, 6.00) | 2.83 (1.72, 4.65) |
Note. ORu: univariate odds ratios, obtained by univariate logistic regression models. AOR: adjusted odds ratio, obtained by binary logistic regression after adjustment of school district, grade, perceived family financial situation, smartphone ownership, academic performance, and perceived study pressure; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; IA: Internet addiction; OSN: online social networking; OSNA: online social networking addiction.
p < .001.
Associations between Insomnia, OSNA, IA, and depression among adolescents (n = 1,015)
| Depression, | Model 1 AOR (95% CI) | Model 2 AOR (95% CI) | Model 3 AOR (95% CI) | Model 4 AOR (95% CI) | Model 5 AOR (95% CI) | Model 6 AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IA status | |||||||
| Non-IA/no Internet use | 197 (21.1) | 1 | – | – | 1 | 1 | |
| IA | 41 (50.0) | 2.79 (1.71, 4.55)*** | 1.80 (1.07, 3.04)* | 2.23 (1.34, 3.70)** | |||
| OSNA status | |||||||
| Non-OSNA/no OSN use | 126 (16.67) | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 | |
| OSNA | 112 (43.2) | 3.27 (2.33, 4.59)*** | 3.12 (2.22, 4.40)*** | 2.80 (1.98, 3.98)*** | |||
| Insomniacs | |||||||
| No | 87 (13.7) | – | – | 1 | – | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 151 (40.0) | 3.46 (2.53, 4.76)*** | 3.27 (2.38, 4.52)*** | 2.92 (2.08, 4.09)*** | |||
Note. All models were adjusted by school district, grade, perceived family financial situation, academic performance, perceived study pressure, and smartphone ownership. OSNA: online social networking addiction; IA: Internet addiction; CI: confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; –: not applicable.
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.