Massimiliano de Zambotti1, Leonardo Rosas1, Ian M Colrain1,2, Fiona C Baker1,3. 1. Center for Health Sciences, SRI International, Menlo Park, California. 2. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 3. Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Abstract
Objective/Background: To evaluate the performance of a multisensor sleep-tracker (ŌURA ring) against polysomnography (PSG) in measuring sleep and sleep stages. Participants: Forty-one healthy adolescents and young adults (13 females; Age: 17.2 ± 2.4 years). Methods: Sleep data were recorded using the ŌURA ring and standard PSG on a single laboratory overnight. Metrics were compared using Bland-Altman plots and epoch-by-epoch (EBE) analysis. Results: Summary variables for sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were not different between ŌURA ring and PSG. PSG-ŌURA discrepancies for WASO were greater in participants with more PSG-defined WASO (p < .001). Compared with PSG, ŌURA ring underestimated PSG N3 (~20 min) and overestimated PSG REM (~17 min; p < .05). PSG-ŌURA differences for TST and WASO lay within the ≤ 30 min a-priori-set clinically satisfactory ranges for 87.8% and 85.4% of the sample, respectively. From EBE analysis, ŌURA ring had a 96% sensitivity to detect sleep, and agreement of 65%, 51%, and 61%, in detecting "light sleep" (N1), "deep sleep" (N2 + N3), and REM sleep, respectively. Specificity in detecting wake was 48%. Similarly to PSG-N3 (p < .001), "deep sleep" detected with the ŌURA ring was negatively correlated with advancing age (p = .001). ŌURA ring correctly categorized 90.9%, 81.3%, and 92.9% into PSG-defined TST ranges of < 6 hr, 6-7 hr, > 7 hr, respectively. Conclusions: Multisensor sleep trackers, such as the ŌURA ring have the potential for detecting outcomes beyond binary sleep-wake using sources of information in addition to motion. While these first results could be viewed as promising, future development and validation are needed.
Objective/Background: To evaluate the performance of a multisensor sleep-tracker (ŌURA ring) against polysomnography (PSG) in measuring sleep and sleep stages. Participants: Forty-one healthy adolescents and young adults (13 females; Age: 17.2 ± 2.4 years). Methods: Sleep data were recorded using the ŌURA ring and standard PSG on a single laboratory overnight. Metrics were compared using Bland-Altman plots and epoch-by-epoch (EBE) analysis. Results: Summary variables for sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were not different between ŌURA ring and PSG. PSG-ŌURA discrepancies for WASO were greater in participants with more PSG-defined WASO (p < .001). Compared with PSG, ŌURA ring underestimated PSG N3 (~20 min) and overestimated PSG REM (~17 min; p < .05). PSG-ŌURA differences for TST and WASO lay within the ≤ 30 min a-priori-set clinically satisfactory ranges for 87.8% and 85.4% of the sample, respectively. From EBE analysis, ŌURA ring had a 96% sensitivity to detect sleep, and agreement of 65%, 51%, and 61%, in detecting "light sleep" (N1), "deep sleep" (N2 + N3), and REM sleep, respectively. Specificity in detecting wake was 48%. Similarly to PSG-N3 (p < .001), "deep sleep" detected with the ŌURA ring was negatively correlated with advancing age (p = .001). ŌURA ring correctly categorized 90.9%, 81.3%, and 92.9% into PSG-defined TST ranges of < 6 hr, 6-7 hr, > 7 hr, respectively. Conclusions: Multisensor sleep trackers, such as the ŌURA ring have the potential for detecting outcomes beyond binary sleep-wake using sources of information in addition to motion. While these first results could be viewed as promising, future development and validation are needed.
Authors: Massimiliano de Zambotti; Job G Godino; Fiona C Baker; Joseph Cheung; Kevin Patrick; Ian M Colrain Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Massimiliano de Zambotti; Stephanie Claudatos; Sarah Inkelis; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker Journal: Chronobiol Int Date: 2015 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: Robert Joseph Thomas; Joseph E Mietus; Chung-Kang Peng; Dan Guo; David Gozal; Hawley Montgomery-Downs; Daniel J Gottlieb; Cheng-Yen Wang; Ary L Goldberger Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Christopher M Depner; Philip C Cheng; Jaime K Devine; Seema Khosla; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Rébecca Robillard; Andrew Vakulin; Sean P A Drummond Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Aimée Goldstone; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Massimiliano de Zambotti; John Trinder; Alessandro Silvani; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2018-03-30 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Qiao Li; Qichen Li; Ayse S Cakmak; Giulia Da Poian; Donald L Bliwise; Viola Vaccarino; Amit J Shah; Gari D Clifford Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.833