Literature DB >> 29734975

Ability of the Multisensory Jawbone UP3 to Quantify and Classify Sleep in Patients With Suspected Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Comparison Against Polysomnography and Actigraphy.

Jesse D Cook1, Michael L Prairie1, David T Plante1.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the ability of a multisensory fitness tracker, the Jawbone UP3 (JB3), to quantify and classify sleep in patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence.
METHODS: This study included 43 patients who completed polysomnography (PSG) and a Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) with concurrent wrist-worn JB3 and Actiwatch 2 (AW2) recordings for comparison. Mean differences in nocturnal sleep architecture variables were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were derived for both devices relative to PSG. Ability of the JB3 to detect sleep onset rapid eye movement periods (SOREMPs) during MSLT naps was also quantified.
RESULTS: JB3 demonstrated a significant overestimation of total sleep time (39.6 min, P < .0001) relative to PSG, but performed comparably to AW2. Although the ability of the JB3 to detect epochs of sleep was relatively good (sensitivity = 0.97), its ability to distinguish light, deep, and REM sleep was poor. Similarly, the JB3 did not correctly identify a single SOREMP during any MSLT nap opportunity.
CONCLUSIONS: The JB3 did not accurately quantify or classify sleep in patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence, and was particularly poor at identifying REM sleep. Thus, this device cannot be used as a surrogate for PSG or MSLT in the assessment of patients with suspected central disorders of hypersomnolence.
© 2018 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Jawbone; actigraphy; fitness tracker; hypersomnolence; sleep; sleepiness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29734975      PMCID: PMC5940436          DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.7120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  21 in total

1.  Sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic measures with multiple sites per unit.

Authors:  Christiana Drake; Richard A Levine
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Evaluation of immobility time for sleep latency in actigraphy.

Authors:  Kyu Young Chae; Daniel F Kripke; J Steven Poceta; Farhad Shadan; Shazia M Jamil; John W Cronin; Lawrence E Kline
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 3.492

3.  Late-Life Depression: A Role for Accelerometer Technology in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Ipsit V Vahia; Daniel D Sewell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Leonardo Rosas; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.964

5.  Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Lisa J Meltzer; Laura S Hiruma; Kristin Avis; Hawley Montgomery-Downs; Judith Valentin
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Movement toward a novel activity monitoring device.

Authors:  Hawley E Montgomery-Downs; Salvatore P Insana; Jonathan A Bond
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Actigraphic assessment of sleep/wake behavior in central disorders of hypersomnolence.

Authors:  Marco Filardi; Fabio Pizza; Monica Martoni; Stefano Vandi; Giuseppe Plazzi; Vincenzo Natale
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  Hypersomnolence and narcolepsy; a pragmatic diagnostic neurophysiological approach.

Authors:  P Boon; D Pevernagie; D Schrans
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.396

9.  Idiopathic hypersomnia with and without long sleep time: a controlled series of 75 patients.

Authors:  Cyrille Vernet; Isabelle Arnulf
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  Test-retest reliability of the multiple sleep latency test in narcolepsy without cataplexy and idiopathic hypersomnia.

Authors:  Lynn Marie Trotti; Beth A Staab; David B Rye
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Sensors Capabilities, Performance, and Use of Consumer Sleep Technology.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Luca Menghini; Michela Sarlo; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-01-03

2.  A standardized framework for testing the performance of sleep-tracking technology: step-by-step guidelines and open-source code.

Authors:  Luca Menghini; Nicola Cellini; Aimee Goldstone; Fiona C Baker; Massimiliano de Zambotti
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kanady; Leslie Ruoff; Laura D Straus; Jonathan Varbel; Thomas Metzler; Anne Richards; Sabra S Inslicht; Aoife O'Donovan; Jennifer Hlavin; Thomas C Neylan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Wearable technologies for developing sleep and circadian biomarkers: a summary of workshop discussions.

Authors:  Christopher M Depner; Philip C Cheng; Jaime K Devine; Seema Khosla; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Rébecca Robillard; Andrew Vakulin; Sean P A Drummond
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 5.849

5.  Field-based Measurement of Sleep: Agreement between Six Commercial Activity Monitors and a Validated Accelerometer.

Authors:  Andrew G Kubala; Bethany Barone Gibbs; Daniel J Buysse; Sanjay R Patel; Martica H Hall; Christopher E Kline
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.964

6.  Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 and Fitbit Alta HR Against Polysomnography for Assessing Sleep in Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Fernando Moreno-Pino; Alejandro Porras-Segovia; Pilar López-Esteban; Antonio Artés; Enrique Baca-García
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 7.  Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Aimée Goldstone; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Optimizing Actigraphic Estimation of Sleep Duration in Suspected Idiopathic Hypersomnia.

Authors:  Jesse D Cook; Sahand C Eftekari; Lydia A Leavitt; Michael L Prairie; David T Plante
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Sleep stage prediction with raw acceleration and photoplethysmography heart rate data derived from a consumer wearable device.

Authors:  Olivia Walch; Yitong Huang; Daniel Forger; Cathy Goldstein
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 10.  Sleep Disorders in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Insights From Animal Models, Especially Non-human Primate Model.

Authors:  Shufei Feng; Haoyu Huang; Na Wang; Yuanyuan Wei; Yun Liu; Dongdong Qin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.