Literature DB >> 32215550

Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.

Daniel M Roberts1, Margeaux M Schade2, Gina M Mathew2, Daniel Gartenberg1, Orfeu M Buxton2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: Multisensor wearable consumer devices allowing the collection of multiple data sources, such as heart rate and motion, for the evaluation of sleep in the home environment, are increasingly ubiquitous. However, the validity of such devices for sleep assessment has not been directly compared to alternatives such as wrist actigraphy or polysomnography (PSG).
METHODS: Eight participants each completed four nights in a sleep laboratory, equipped with PSG and several wearable devices. Registered polysomnographic technologist-scored PSG served as ground truth for sleep-wake state. Wearable devices providing sleep-wake classification data were compared to PSG at both an epoch-by-epoch and night level. Data from multisensor wearables (Apple Watch and Oura Ring) were compared to data available from electrocardiography and a triaxial wrist actigraph to evaluate the quality and utility of heart rate and motion data. Machine learning methods were used to train and test sleep-wake classifiers, using data from consumer wearables. The quality of classifications derived from devices was compared.
RESULTS: For epoch-by-epoch sleep-wake performance, research devices ranged in d' between 1.771 and 1.874, with sensitivity between 0.912 and 0.982, and specificity between 0.366 and 0.647. Data from multisensor wearables were strongly correlated at an epoch-by-epoch level with reference data sources. Classifiers developed from the multisensor wearable data ranged in d' between 1.827 and 2.347, with sensitivity between 0.883 and 0.977, and specificity between 0.407 and 0.821.
CONCLUSIONS: Data from multisensor consumer wearables are strongly correlated with reference devices at the epoch level and can be used to develop epoch-by-epoch models of sleep-wake rivaling existing research devices. © Sleep Research Society 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  actigraphy; artificial intelligence; big data; machine learning; polysomnography; smartphone; wearable

Year:  2020        PMID: 32215550      PMCID: PMC7355403          DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsaa045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  50 in total

Review 1.  Photoplethysmography: beyond the calculation of arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate.

Authors:  Kirk H Shelley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleep.

Authors:  Jean Paquet; Anna Kawinska; Julie Carrier
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  The economic cost of inadequate sleep.

Authors:  David Hillman; Scott Mitchell; Jared Streatfeild; Chloe Burns; Dorothy Bruck; Lynne Pezzullo
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Activity-based sleep-wake identification: an empirical test of methodological issues.

Authors:  A Sadeh; K M Sharkey; M A Carskadon
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Wrist actigraphic measures of sleep and rhythms.

Authors:  D F Kripke; D J Mullaney; S Messin; V G Wyborney
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-05

7.  The cost of poor sleep: workplace productivity loss and associated costs.

Authors:  Mark R Rosekind; Kevin B Gregory; Melissa M Mallis; Summer L Brandt; Brian Seal; Debra Lerner
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.162

8.  Sleep disorders as a cause of motor vehicle collisions.

Authors:  Marco Túlio de Mello; Fernanda Veruska Narciso; Sergio Tufik; Teresa Paiva; David Warren Spence; Ahmed S Bahammam; Joris C Verster; Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03

9.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.

Authors:  Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  What wrist should you wear your actigraphy device on? Analysis of dominant vs. non-dominant wrist actigraphy for measuring sleep in healthy adults.

Authors:  Matthew William Driller; Shannon O'Donnell; Francisco Tavares
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Conducting Bring Your Own "Device" (BYOD) Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Charmaine Demanuele; Cynthia Lokker; Krishna Jhaveri; Pirinka Georgiev; Emre Sezgin; Cindy Geoghegan; Kelly H Zou; Elena Izmailova; Marie McCarthy
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Sleep-wake parameters can be detected in patients with chronic stroke using a multisensor accelerometer: a validation study.

Authors:  Elie Gottlieb; Leonid Churilov; Emilio Werden; Thomas Churchward; Matthew P Pase; Natalia Egorova; Mark E Howard; Amy Brodtmann
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 3.  Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Andrew Leroux; Rachael Rzasa-Lynn; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Tushar Sharma
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-19

4.  Efficient embedded sleep wake classification for open-source actigraphy.

Authors:  Tommaso Banfi; Nicolò Valigi; Marco di Galante; Paola d'Ascanio; Gastone Ciuti; Ugo Faraguna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Study Protocol on the Validation of the Quality of Sleep Data from Xiaomi Domestic Wristbands.

Authors:  Patricia Concheiro-Moscoso; Francisco José Martínez-Martínez; María Del Carmen Miranda-Duro; Thais Pousada; Laura Nieto-Riveiro; Betania Groba; Francisco Javier Mejuto-Muiño; Javier Pereira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Lifestyle Modification Using a Wearable Biometric Ring and Guided Feedback Improve Sleep and Exercise Behaviors: A 12-Month Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Jonathan D Browne; David M Boland; Jaxon T Baum; Kayla Ikemiya; Quincy Harris; Marin Phillips; Eric V Neufeld; David Gomez; Phillip Goldman; Brett A Dolezal
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  A longitudinal analysis of COVID-19 lockdown stringency on sleep and resting heart rate measures across 20 countries.

Authors:  Ju Lynn Ong; TeYang Lau; Mari Karsikas; Hannu Kinnunen; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Wearable monitoring of sleep-disordered breathing: estimation of the apnea-hypopnea index using wrist-worn reflective photoplethysmography.

Authors:  Gabriele B Papini; Pedro Fonseca; Merel M van Gilst; Jan W M Bergmans; Rik Vullings; Sebastiaan Overeem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.

Authors:  Nicholas I Y N Chee; Shohreh Ghorbani; Hosein Aghayan Golkashani; Ruth L F Leong; Ju Lynn Ong; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2021-02-15

10.  Trait-like nocturnal sleep behavior identified by combining wearable, phone-use, and self-report data.

Authors:  Stijn A A Massar; Xin Yu Chua; Chun Siong Soon; Alyssa S C Ng; Ju Lynn Ong; Nicholas I Y N Chee; Tih Shih Lee; Arko Ghosh; Michael W L Chee
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.