Literature DB >> 28289314

Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules.

David Maresca1, Anupama Lakshmanan2, Audrey Lee-Gosselin1, Johan M Melis2, Yu-Li Ni1, Raymond W Bourdeau1, Dennis M Kochmann3, Mikhail G Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is widely used to probe the mechanical structure of tissues and visualize blood flow. However, the ability of ultrasound to observe specific molecular and cellular signals is limited. Recently, a unique class of gas-filled protein nanostructures called gas vesicles (GVs) was introduced as nanoscale (∼250 nm) contrast agents for ultrasound, accompanied by the possibilities of genetic engineering, imaging of targets outside the vasculature and monitoring of cellular signals such as gene expression. These possibilities would be aided by methods to discriminate GV-generated ultrasound signals from anatomical background. Here, we show that the nonlinear response of engineered GVs to acoustic pressure enables selective imaging of these nanostructures using a tailored amplitude modulation strategy. Finite element modeling predicted a strongly nonlinear mechanical deformation and acoustic response to ultrasound in engineered GVs. This response was confirmed with ultrasound measurements in the range of 10 to 25 MHz. An amplitude modulation pulse sequence based on this nonlinear response allows engineered GVs to be distinguished from linear scatterers and other GV types with a contrast ratio greater than 11.5 dB. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this nonlinear imaging strategy in vitro, in cellulo, and in vivo.

Year:  2017        PMID: 28289314      PMCID: PMC5315666          DOI: 10.1063/1.4976105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Phys Lett        ISSN: 0003-6951            Impact factor:   3.791


  10 in total

Review 1.  WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: nature and types of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  D H Simpson; C T Chin; P N Burns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography and transient elastography.

Authors:  Gabriel Montaldo; Mickaël Tanter; Jérémy Bercoff; Nicolas Benech; Mathias Fink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Anupama Lakshmanan; Arash Farhadi; Suchita P Nety; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Raymond W Bourdeau; David Maresca; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Second harmonic inversion for ultrasound contrast harmonic imaging.

Authors:  Mirza Pasovic; Mike Danilouchkine; Telli Faez; Paul L M J van Neer; Christian Cachard; Antonius F W van der Steen; Olivier Basset; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Imaging microvasculature with contrast-enhanced ultraharmonic ultrasound.

Authors:  David Maresca; Ilya Skachkov; Guillaume Renaud; Krista Jansen; Gijs van Soest; Nico de Jong; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Far-wall pseudoenhancement during contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the carotid arteries: clinical description and in vitro reproduction.

Authors:  Gerrit L ten Kate; Guillaume G J Renaud; Zeynettin Akkus; Stijn C H van den Oord; Folkert J ten Cate; Vijay Shamdasani; Rob R Entrekin; Eric J G Sijbrands; Nico de Jong; Johan G Bosch; Arend F L Schinkel; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Gas vesicles.

Authors:  A E Walsby
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-03

9.  Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and regional left ventricular function by analysis of contrast-enhanced power modulation images.

Authors:  V Mor-Avi; E G Caiani; K A Collins; C E Korcarz; J E Bednarz; R M Lang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Patrick W Goodwill; Arkosnato Neogy; Melissa Yin; F Stuart Foster; David V Schaffer; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 39.213

  10 in total
  24 in total

1.  Acoustic biosensors for ultrasound imaging of enzyme activity.

Authors:  Anupama Lakshmanan; Zhiyang Jin; Suchita P Nety; Daniel P Sawyer; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Dina Malounda; Mararet B Swift; David Maresca; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 2.  Ultrasound Technologies for Imaging and Modulating Neural Activity.

Authors:  Claire Rabut; Sangjin Yoo; Robert C Hurt; Zhiyang Jin; Hongyi Li; Hongsun Guo; Bill Ling; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Biomolecular Ultrasound Imaging of Phagolysosomal Function.

Authors:  Bill Ling; Justin Lee; David Maresca; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Dina Malounda; Margaret B Swift; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 4.  Going Deeper: Biomolecular Tools for Acoustic and Magnetic Imaging and Control of Cellular Function.

Authors:  Dan I Piraner; Arash Farhadi; Hunter C Davis; Di Wu; David Maresca; Jerzy O Szablowski; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics.

Authors:  David Maresca; Anupama Lakshmanan; Mohamad Abedi; Avinoam Bar-Zion; Arash Farhadi; George J Lu; Jerzy O Szablowski; Di Wu; Sangjin Yoo; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.059

6.  Ultrasound imaging of gene expression in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Arash Farhadi; Gabrielle H Ho; Daniel P Sawyer; Raymond W Bourdeau; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Achieving Spatial and Molecular Specificity with Ultrasound-Targeted Biomolecular Nanotherapeutics.

Authors:  Jerzy O Szablowski; Avinoam Bar-Zion; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 22.384

8.  Nonlinear X-wave ultrasound imaging of acoustic biomolecules.

Authors:  David Maresca; Daniel P Sawyer; Guillaume Renaud; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Phys Rev X       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 15.762

Review 9.  Proteins, air and water: reporter genes for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  George J Lu; Arash Farhadi; Arnab Mukherjee; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  Molecular Sensing with Host Systems for Hyperpolarized 129Xe.

Authors:  Jabadurai Jayapaul; Leif Schröder
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.