Literature DB >> 34040818

Nonlinear X-wave ultrasound imaging of acoustic biomolecules.

David Maresca1, Daniel P Sawyer2, Guillaume Renaud3, Audrey Lee-Gosselin1, Mikhail G Shapiro1.   

Abstract

The basic physics of sound waves enables ultrasound to visualize biological tissues with high spatial and temporal resolution. Recently, this capability was enhanced with the development of acoustic biomolecules - proteins with physical properties enabling them to scatter sound. The expression of these unique air-filled proteins, known as gas vesicles (GVs), in cells allows ultrasound to image cellular functions such as gene expression in vivo, providing ultrasound with its analog of optical fluorescent proteins. Acoustical methods for the in vivo detection of GVs are now required to maximize the impact of this technology in biology and medicine. We previously engineered GVs exhibiting a nonlinear scattering behavior in response to acoustic pressures above 300 kPa, and showed that amplitude-modulated (AM) ultrasound pulse sequences that both excite the linear and nonlinear GV scattering regimes were highly effective at distinguishing GVs from linear scatterers like soft biological tissues. Unfortunately, the in vivo specificity of AM ultrasound imaging is systematically compromised by the nonlinearity added by the GVs to propagating waves, resulting in strong image artifacts from linear scatterers downstream of GV inclusions. To address this issue, we present an imaging paradigm, cross-amplitude modulation (xAM), which relies on cross-propagating plane-wave transmissions of finite aperture X-waves to achieve quasi artifact-free in vivo imaging of GVs. The xAM method derives from counter-propagating wave interaction theory which predicts that, in media exhibiting quadratic elastic nonlinearity like biological tissue, the nonlinear interaction of counter-propagating acoustic waves is inefficient. By transmitting cross-propagating plane-waves, we minimize cumulative nonlinear interaction effects due to collinear wave propagation, while generating a transient wave-amplitude modulation at the two plane-waves' intersection. We show in both simulations and experiments that residual xAM nonlinearity due to wave propagation decreases as the plane-wave cross-propagation angle increases. We demonstrate in tissue-mimicking phantoms that imaging artifacts distal to GV inclusions decrease as the plane-wave cross-propagation angle opens, nearing complete extinction at angles above 16.5 degrees. Finally, we demonstrate that xAM enables highly specific in vivo imaging of GVs located in the gastrointestinal tract, a target of prime interest for future cellular imaging. These results advance the physical facet of the emerging field of biomolecular ultrasound, and are also relevant to synthetic ultrasound contrast agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustics; Biological Physics; Nonlinear Dynamics

Year:  2018        PMID: 34040818      PMCID: PMC8147876          DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.8.041002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev X        ISSN: 2160-3308            Impact factor:   15.762


  28 in total

1.  Modeling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method.

Authors:  Bradley E Treeby; Jiri Jaros; Alistair P Rendell; B T Cox
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Increasing specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging using the interaction of quasi counter-propagating wavefronts: a proof of concept.

Authors:  Guillaume Renaud; Johan G Bosch; Antonius F W van der Steen; Nico de Jong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Nondiffracting X waves-exact solutions to free-space scalar wave equation and their finite aperture realizations.

Authors:  J Y Lu; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  D H Simpson; C T Chin; P N Burns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Pressure-dependent attenuation and scattering of phospholipid-coated microbubbles at low acoustic pressures.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Hendrik J Vos; David E Goertz; Annemieke van Wamel; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  The green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  R Y Tsien
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Second harmonic inversion for ultrasound contrast harmonic imaging.

Authors:  Mirza Pasovic; Mike Danilouchkine; Telli Faez; Paul L M J van Neer; Christian Cachard; Antonius F W van der Steen; Olivier Basset; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Frequency and pressure dependent attenuation and scattering by microbubbles.

Authors:  Meng-Xing Tang; Robert J Eckersley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Direct wavefront sensing for high-resolution in vivo imaging in scattering tissue.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Wenzhi Sun; Christopher T Richie; Brandon K Harvey; Eric Betzig; Na Ji
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Patrick W Goodwill; Arkosnato Neogy; Melissa Yin; F Stuart Foster; David V Schaffer; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 39.213

View more
  10 in total

1.  Difference-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging With Non-Linear Contrast.

Authors:  Yilei Li; Dina Polyak; Eli Johnson; Derek Yecies; Saba Shevidi; Adam de la Zerda; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Steven Chu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 2.  Ultrasound-Responsive Systems as Components for Smart Materials.

Authors:  Athanasios G Athanassiadis; Zhichao Ma; Nicolas Moreno-Gomez; Kai Melde; Eunjin Choi; Rahul Goyal; Peer Fischer
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Multiplexed Ultrasound Imaging Using Spectral Analysis on Gas Vesicles.

Authors:  Sangnam Kim; Siyuan Zhang; Sangpil Yoon
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 11.092

4.  Direct imaging of antigen-antibody binding by atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Mingyan Gao; Zuobin Wang; Yujuan Chen; Zhengxun Song; Hongmei Xu
Journal:  Appl Nanosci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 5.  Genetically encodable materials for non-invasive biological imaging.

Authors:  Arash Farhadi; Felix Sigmund; Gil Gregor Westmeyer; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 43.841

6.  Ultrafast amplitude modulation for molecular and hemodynamic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Claire Rabut; Di Wu; Bill Ling; Zhiyang Jin; Dina Malounda; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.971

7.  High-Frequency Array-Based Nanobubble Nonlinear Imaging in a Phantom and In Vivo.

Authors:  Carly Pellow; Emmanuel Cherin; Eric C Abenojar; Agata A Exner; Gang Zheng; Christine E M Demore; David E Goertz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Dissipative Particle Dynamics Simulation of Ultrasound Propagation through Liquid Water.

Authors:  Petra Papež; Matej Praprotnik
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 9.  Application of Genetically Encoded Molecular Imaging Probes in Tumor Imaging.

Authors:  Meng Du; Ting Wang; Yaozhang Yang; Fengyi Zeng; Yue Li; Zhiyi Chen
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 3.009

10.  Ultrasensitive ultrasound imaging of gene expression with signal unmixing.

Authors:  Daniel P Sawyer; Avinoam Bar-Zion; Arash Farhadi; Shirin Shivaei; Bill Ling; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 28.547

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.