Literature DB >> 27351374

Molecular Engineering of Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Anupama Lakshmanan1, Arash Farhadi1, Suchita P Nety1, Audrey Lee-Gosselin1, Raymond W Bourdeau1, David Maresca1, Mikhail G Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is among the most widely used biomedical imaging modalities, but has limited ability to image specific molecular targets due to the lack of suitable nanoscale contrast agents. Gas vesicles-genetically encoded protein nanostructures isolated from buoyant photosynthetic microbes-have recently been identified as nanoscale reporters for ultrasound. Their unique physical properties give gas vesicles significant advantages over conventional microbubble contrast agents, including nanoscale dimensions and inherent physical stability. Furthermore, as a genetically encoded material, gas vesicles present the possibility that the nanoscale mechanical, acoustic, and targeting properties of an imaging agent can be engineered at the level of its constituent proteins. Here, we demonstrate that genetic engineering of gas vesicles results in nanostructures with new mechanical, acoustic, surface, and functional properties to enable harmonic, multiplexed, and multimodal ultrasound imaging as well as cell-specific molecular targeting. These results establish a biomolecular platform for the engineering of acoustic nanomaterials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic nanostructures; cancer; contrast agents; gas vesicles; genetic engineering; macrophages; molecular imaging; protein engineering; ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27351374      PMCID: PMC6058967          DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b03364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  23 in total

Review 1.  Clinical uses of microbubbles in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  David Cosgrove; Chris Harvey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Minimal "Self" peptides that inhibit phagocytic clearance and enhance delivery of nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pia L Rodriguez; Takamasa Harada; David A Christian; Diego A Pantano; Richard K Tsai; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Gas vesicle proteins.

Authors:  A E Walsby; P K Hayes
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  GvpCs with reduced numbers of repeating sequence elements bind to and strengthen cyanobacterial gas vesicles.

Authors:  R Kinsman; A E Walsby; P K Hayes
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  The gvpA/C cluster of Anabaena flos-aquae has multiple copies of a gene encoding GvpA.

Authors:  P K Hayes; R S Powell
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.552

6.  Gas vesicles are strengthened by the outer-surface protein, GvpC.

Authors:  P K Hayes; B Buchholz; A E Walsby
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.552

7.  Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery.

Authors:  Elvin Blanco; Haifa Shen; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  An improved genetic system for bioengineering buoyant gas vesicle nanoparticles from Haloarchaea.

Authors:  Shiladitya DasSarma; Ram Karan; Priya DasSarma; Susan Barnes; Folasade Ekulona; Barbara Smith
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters.

Authors:  Mikhail G Shapiro; Patrick W Goodwill; Arkosnato Neogy; Melissa Yin; F Stuart Foster; David V Schaffer; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Recombinant gas vesicles from Halobacterium sp. displaying SIV peptides demonstrate biotechnology potential as a pathogen peptide delivery vehicle.

Authors:  Marinko Sremac; Elizabeth S Stuart
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.563

View more
  45 in total

1.  In vivo Biodistribution of Radiolabeled Acoustic Protein Nanostructures.

Authors:  Johann Le Floc'h; Aimen Zlitni; Holly A Bilton; Melissa Yin; Arash Farhadi; Nancy R Janzen; Mikhail G Shapiro; John F Valliant; F Stuart Foster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Acoustic biosensors for ultrasound imaging of enzyme activity.

Authors:  Anupama Lakshmanan; Zhiyang Jin; Suchita P Nety; Daniel P Sawyer; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Dina Malounda; Mararet B Swift; David Maresca; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 15.040

3.  X-ray-Based Techniques to Study the Nano-Bio Interface.

Authors:  Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; John M Abendroth; Tobias Beck; Robert Blick; Yuan Cao; Frank Caruso; Indranath Chakraborty; Henry N Chapman; Chunying Chen; Bruce E Cohen; Andre L C Conceição; David P Cormode; Daxiang Cui; Kenneth A Dawson; Gerald Falkenberg; Chunhai Fan; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Elisabetta Gargioni; Claus-C Glüer; Florian Grüner; Moustapha Hassan; Yong Hu; Yalan Huang; Samuel Huber; Nils Huse; Yanan Kang; Ali Khademhosseini; Thomas F Keller; Christian Körnig; Nicholas A Kotov; Dorota Koziej; Xing-Jie Liang; Beibei Liu; Sijin Liu; Yang Liu; Ziyao Liu; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Andres Machicote; Wolfgang Maison; Adrian P Mancuso; Saad Megahed; Bert Nickel; Ferdinand Otto; Cristina Palencia; Sakura Pascarelli; Arwen Pearson; Oula Peñate-Medina; Bing Qi; Joachim Rädler; Joseph J Richardson; Axel Rosenhahn; Kai Rothkamm; Michael Rübhausen; Milan K Sanyal; Raymond E Schaak; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Marius Schmidt; Oliver Schmutzler; Theo Schotten; Florian Schulz; A K Sood; Kathryn M Spiers; Theresa Staufer; Dominik M Stemer; Andreas Stierle; Xing Sun; Gohar Tsakanova; Paul S Weiss; Horst Weller; Fabian Westermeier; Ming Xu; Huijie Yan; Yuan Zeng; Ying Zhao; Yuliang Zhao; Dingcheng Zhu; Ying Zhu; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  Nonlinear ultrasound imaging of nanoscale acoustic biomolecules.

Authors:  David Maresca; Anupama Lakshmanan; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Johan M Melis; Yu-Li Ni; Raymond W Bourdeau; Dennis M Kochmann; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Genetically Encodable Contrast Agents for Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  George J Lu; Li-Dek Chou; Dina Malounda; Amit K Patel; Derek S Welsbie; Daniel L Chao; Tirunelveli Ramalingam; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 6.  Molecular Imaging in Synthetic Biology, and Synthetic Biology in Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Assaf A Gilad; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  Ultrasound Technologies for Imaging and Modulating Neural Activity.

Authors:  Claire Rabut; Sangjin Yoo; Robert C Hurt; Zhiyang Jin; Hongyi Li; Hongsun Guo; Bill Ling; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Biomolecular Ultrasound Imaging of Phagolysosomal Function.

Authors:  Bill Ling; Justin Lee; David Maresca; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Dina Malounda; Margaret B Swift; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Nonlinear X-wave ultrasound imaging of acoustic biomolecules.

Authors:  David Maresca; Daniel P Sawyer; Guillaume Renaud; Audrey Lee-Gosselin; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Phys Rev X       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 15.762

Review 10.  Proteins, air and water: reporter genes for ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  George J Lu; Arash Farhadi; Arnab Mukherjee; Mikhail G Shapiro
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.