Literature DB >> 10708071

The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants.

P C Loizou1, M Dorman, J Fitzke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding when the speech signals are processed in a manner similar to a 6-channel cochlear implant speech processor.
DESIGN: Signals were processed in a manner similar to a 6-channel cochlear implant processor and output as a sum of sine waves with frequencies equal to the center frequencies of the analysis filters. The amplitudes of the sine waves were compressed in a systematic fashion to simulate the effect of reduced dynamic range. The compressed signals were presented to 10 normal-hearing listeners for identification.
RESULTS: There was a significant effect of compression for all test materials. The effect of the compression on speech understanding was different for the three test materials (vowels, consonants, and sentences). Vowel recognition was affected the most by the compression, and consonant recognition was affected the least by the compression. Feature analysis indicated that the reception of place information was affected the most. Sentence recognition was moderately affected by the compression.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic range should affect the speech perception abilities of cochlear implant users. Our results suggest that a relatively wide dynamic range is needed for a high level of vowel recognition and a relatively small dynamic range is sufficient to maintain consonant recognition. We infer from this outcome that, if other factors were held equal, an implant patient with a small dynamic range could achieve moderately high scores on tests of consonant recognition but poor performance on vowel recognition, and that it is more likely for an implant patient with a large dynamic range to obtain high scores on vowel recognition than for an implant patient with a small dynamic range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10708071     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200002000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  13 in total

1.  Combined spectral and temporal enhancement to improve cochlear-implant speech perception.

Authors:  Aparajita Bhattacharya; Andrew Vandali; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

3.  Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Auditory midbrain implant: a review.

Authors:  Hubert H Lim; Minoo Lenarz; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-09

5.  Evaluation of adaptive dynamic range optimization in adverse listening conditions for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Hussnain Ali; Oldooz Hazrati; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

7.  VALIDATION OF ACOUSTIC MODELS OF AUDITORY NEURAL PROSTHESES.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Nai Ding; Elad Sagi; Chin-Tuan Tan; Matthew Fitzgerald; E Katelyn Glassman; Keena Seward; Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2013-05

8.  Effects of pulse phase duration and location of stimulation within the inferior colliculus on auditory cortical evoked potentials in a guinea pig model.

Authors:  Anke Neuheiser; Minoo Lenarz; Guenter Reuter; Roger Calixto; Ingo Nolte; Thomas Lenarz; Hubert H Lim
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-08-18

9.  Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Amberly D Nye
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Lai; Yu Tsao; Fei Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.