Literature DB >> 29960500

Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.

Lei Feng1, Andrew J Oxenham1.   

Abstract

The identity of a speech sound can be affected by the long-term spectrum of a preceding stimulus. Poor spectral resolution of cochlear implants (CIs) may affect such context effects. Here, spectral contrast effects on a phoneme category boundary were investigated in CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Surprisingly, larger contrast effects were observed in CI users than in NH listeners, even when spectral resolution in NH listeners was limited via vocoder processing. The results may reflect a different weighting of spectral cues by CI users, based on poorer spectral resolution, which in turn may enhance some spectral contrast effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29960500      PMCID: PMC6002271          DOI: 10.1121/1.5042082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vowel enhancement effects in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Catherine L Rogers; Lindsay B Johnson; Soo Hee Oh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion.

Authors:  A J Watkins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Ariane E Rhone; Monita Chatterjee; William J Idsardi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-05

9.  Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.

Authors:  Julie A Bierer; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Age-Related Temporal Processing Deficits in Word Segments in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Casey R Gaskins; Maureen J Shader; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Samira Anderson; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.