Literature DB >> 28272761

Accuracy in the quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effects.

Xiao-Yong Zhang1,2, Feng Wang1,2, Hua Li1,2, Junzhong Xu1,2, Daniel F Gochberg1,2,3, John C Gore1,2,3,4,5, Zhongliang Zu1,2.   

Abstract

Accurate quantification of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects, including dipole-dipole mediated relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer, is important for applications and studies of molecular concentration and transfer rate (and thereby pH or temperature). Although several quantification methods, such as Lorentzian difference (LD) analysis, multiple-pool Lorentzian fits, and the three-point method, have been extensively used in several preclinical and clinical applications, the accuracy of these methods has not been evaluated. Here we simulated multiple-pool Z spectra containing the pools that contribute to the main CEST and rNOE saturation transfer signals in the brain, numerically fit them using the different methods, and then compared their derived CEST metrics with the known solute concentrations and exchange rates. Our results show that the LD analysis overestimates contributions from amide proton transfer (APT) and intermediate exchanging amine protons; the three-point method significantly underestimates both APT and rNOE saturation transfer at -3.5 ppm (NOE(-3.5)). The multiple-pool Lorentzian fit is more accurate than the other two methods, but only at lower irradiation powers (≤1 μT at 9.4 T) within the range of our simulations. At higher irradiation powers, this method is also inaccurate because of the presence of a fast exchanging CEST signal that has a non-Lorentzian lineshape. Quantitative parameters derived from in vivo images of rodent brain tumor obtained using an irradiation power of 1 μT were also compared. Our results demonstrate that all three quantification methods show similar contrasts between tumor and contralateral normal tissue for both APT and the NOE(-3.5). However, the quantified values of the three methods are significantly different. Our work provides insight into the fitting accuracy obtainable in a complex tissue model and provides guidelines for evaluating other newly developed quantification methods.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lorentzian fit; amide proton transfer (APT); chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST); nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28272761      PMCID: PMC5490367          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  55 in total

1.  Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Michael J Schlosser; Peter C M van Zijl; Martin G Pomper; Xavier Golay; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  R1 correction in amide proton transfer imaging: indication of the influence of transcytolemmal water exchange on CEST measurements.

Authors:  Hua Li; Ke Li; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Xiaoyu Jiang; Zhongliang Zu; Moritz Zaiss; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore; Junzhong Xu
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  A new method for detecting exchanging amide protons using chemical exchange rotation transfer.

Authors:  Zhongliang Zu; Vaibhav A Janve; Junzhong Xu; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  In vivo three-dimensional whole-brain pulsed steady-state chemical exchange saturation transfer at 7 T.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Daniel Polders; Jun Hua; He Zhu; Hans J Hoogduin; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter Luijten; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST): what is in a name and what isn't?

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Nirbhay N Yadav
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Assessment of ischemic penumbra in patients with hyperacute stroke using amide proton transfer (APT) chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.

Authors:  Anna Tietze; Jakob Blicher; Irene Klaerke Mikkelsen; Leif Østergaard; Megan K Strother; Seth A Smith; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Quantitative assessment of amide proton transfer (APT) and nuclear overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging with extrapolated semi-solid magnetization transfer reference (EMR) signals: Application to a rat glioma model at 4.7 Tesla.

Authors:  Hye-Young Heo; Yi Zhang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Xiaohua Hong; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Investigating GluCEST and its specificity for pH mapping at low temperatures.

Authors:  Felizitas C Wermter; Christian Bock; Wolfgang Dreher
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) imaging in the human brain at 7T.

Authors:  Craig K Jones; Alan Huang; Jiadi Xu; Richard A E Edden; Michael Schär; Jun Hua; Nikita Oskolkov; Domenico Zacà; Jinyuan Zhou; Michael T McMahon; Jay J Pillai; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Nuclear overhauser enhancement mediated chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging at 7 Tesla in glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Moritz Zaiss; Jan-Eric Meissner; Johannes Windschuh; Benedikt Wiestler; Peter Bachert; Jan Oliver Neumann; Philipp Kickingereder; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Armin Michael Nagel; Sabine Heiland; Mark Edward Ladd; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  33 in total

1.  Improved Differentiation of Low-Grade and High-Grade Gliomas and Detection of Tumor Proliferation Using APT Contrast Fitted from Z-Spectrum.

Authors:  Jiaxuan Zhang; Wenzhen Zhu; Rongwen Tain; Xiaohong Joe Zhou; Kejia Cai
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Separating fast and slow exchange transfer and magnetization transfer using off-resonance variable-delay multiple-pulse (VDMP) MRI.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Xiang Xu; Haifeng Zeng; Kannie W Y Chan; Nirbhay Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Kathryn J Schunke; Nauder Faraday; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  pH-sensitive amide proton transfer effect dominates the magnetization transfer asymmetry contrast during acute ischemia-quantification of multipool contribution to in vivo CEST MRI.

Authors:  Yin Wu; Iris Yuwen Zhou; Dongshuang Lu; Emiri Manderville; Eng H Lo; Hairong Zheng; Phillip Zhe Sun
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  CEST MR-Fingerprinting: Practical considerations and insights for acquisition schedule design and improved reconstruction.

Authors:  Or Perlman; Kai Herz; Moritz Zaiss; Ouri Cohen; Matthew S Rosen; Christian T Farrar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Spin-lock imaging of early tissue pH changes in ischemic rat brain.

Authors:  Zhongliang Zu; Aqeela Afzal; Hua Li; Jingping Xie; John C Gore
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 6.  The Applicability of Amide Proton Transfer Imaging in the Nervous System: Focus on Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy in the Neonate.

Authors:  Yang Zheng; Xiaoming Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 5.046

7.  Chemical exchange rotation transfer imaging of intermediate-exchanging amines at 2 ppm.

Authors:  Zhongliang Zu; Elizabeth A Louie; Eugene C Lin; Xiaoyu Jiang; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Measurement of APT using a combined CERT-AREX approach with varying duty cycles.

Authors:  Zhongliang Zu; Hua Li; Junzhong Xu; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Moritz Zaiss; Ke Li; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  GlucoCEST imaging with on-resonance variable delay multiple pulse (onVDMP) MRI.

Authors:  Xiang Xu; Jiadi Xu; Kannie W Y Chan; Jing Liu; Huanling Liu; Yuguo Li; Lin Chen; Guanshu Liu; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the field-dependent saturation spectrum.

Authors:  Peter C M van Zijl; Wilfred W Lam; Jiadi Xu; Linda Knutsson; Greg J Stanisz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.