Literature DB >> 10877324

A curve-free method for phase I clinical trials.

M Gasparini1, J Eisele.   

Abstract

Consider the problem of finding the dose that is as high as possible subject to having a controlled rate of toxicity. The problem is commonplace in oncology Phase I clinical trials. Such a dose is often called the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) since it represents a necessary trade-off between efficacy and toxicity. The continual reassessment method (CRM) is an improvement over traditional up-and-down schemes for estimating the MTD. It is based on a Bayesian approach and on the assumption that the dose-toxicity relationship follows a specific response curve, e.g., the logistic or power curve. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate how the assumption of a specific curve used in the CRM is not necessary and can actually hinder the efficient use of prior inputs. An alternative curve-free method in which the probabilities of toxicity are modeled directly as an unknown multidimensional parameter is presented. To that purpose, a product-of-beta prior (PBP) is introduced and shown to bring about logical improvements. Practical improvements are illustrated by simulation results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10877324     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  A robust Bayesian dose-finding design for phase I/II clinical trials.

Authors:  Suyu Liu; Valen E Johnson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 2.  Modelling and simulation in the development and use of anti-cancer agents: an underused tool?

Authors:  Ferdinand Rombout; Leon Aarons; Mats Karlsson; Anthony Man; France Mentré; Peter Nygren; Amy Racine; Hans Schaefer; Jean-Louis Steimer; Iñaki Troconiz; Achiel van Peer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs.

Authors:  John O'Quigley; Mark Conaway
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.901

4.  A trivariate continual reassessment method for phase I/II trials of toxicity, efficacy, and surrogate efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Zhong; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The Randomized CRM: An Approach to Overcoming the Long-Memory Property of the CRM.

Authors:  Joseph S Koopmeiners; Andrew Wey
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Stochastic Approximation and Modern Model-based Designs for Dose-Finding Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Parametric Dose Standardization for Optimizing Two-Agent Combinations in a Phase I-II Trial with Ordinal Outcomes.

Authors:  Peter F Thall; Hoang Q Nguyen; Ralph G Zinner
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.864

8.  A surface-free design for phase I dual-agent combination trials.

Authors:  Pavel Mozgunov; Mauro Gasparini; Thomas Jaki
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 9.  Principles of dose finding studies in cancer: a comparison of trial designs.

Authors:  Thomas Jaki; Sally Clive; Christopher J Weir
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Cancer phase I trial design using drug combinations when a fraction of dose limiting toxicities is attributable to one or more agents.

Authors:  Jose L Jimenez; Mourad Tighiouart; Mauro Gasparini
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.