Literature DB >> 27036255

Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Adam Svec1, Judy R Dubno2, Peggy B Nelson1.   

Abstract

Forward-masked thresholds increase as the magnitude of inherent masker envelope fluctuations increase for both normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) adults for a short masker-probe delay (25 ms). The slope of the recovery from forward masking is shallower for HI than for NH listeners due to reduced cochlear nonlinearities. However, effects of hearing loss on additional masking due to inherent envelope fluctuations across masker-probe delays remain unknown. The current study assessed effects of hearing loss on the slope and amount of recovery from forward maskers that varied in inherent envelope fluctuations. Forward-masked thresholds were measured at 2000 and 4000 Hz, for masker-probe delays of 25, 50, and 75 ms, for NH and HI adults. Four maskers at each center frequency varied in inherent envelope fluctuations: Gaussian noise (GN) or low-fluctuation noise (LFN), with 1 or 1/3 equivalent rectangular bandwidths (ERBs). Results suggested that slopes of recovery from forward masking were shallower for HI than for NH listeners regardless of masker fluctuations. Additional masking due to inherent envelope fluctuations was greater for HI than for NH listeners at longer masker-probe delays, suggesting that inherent envelope fluctuations are more disruptive for HI than for NH listeners for a longer time course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27036255      PMCID: PMC4798987          DOI: 10.1121/1.4944041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Monaural masking release in random-phase and low-noise noise.

Authors:  D A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effectiveness of narrow-band versus tonal off-frequency maskers.

Authors:  Sophie Savel; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Judy R Dubno; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling temporal and compressive properties of the normal and impaired auditory system.

Authors:  R P Derleth; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners.

Authors:  C Ludvigsen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  4 in total

1.  Forward Masking of the Speech-Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Sarah E Hodge; Denise C Menezes; Kevin D Brown; John H Grose
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; William J Bologna; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.