Literature DB >> 28242794

Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Vy A Vo1, Thomas C Sprague2,3, John T Serences1,4,5.   

Abstract

Selective visual attention enables organisms to enhance the representation of behaviorally relevant stimuli by altering the encoding properties of single receptive fields (RFs). Yet we know little about how the attentional modulations of single RFs contribute to the encoding of an entire visual scene. Addressing this issue requires (1) measuring a group of RFs that tile a continuous portion of visual space, (2) constructing a population-level measurement of spatial representations based on these RFs, and (3) linking how different types of RF attentional modulations change the population-level representation. To accomplish these aims, we used fMRI to characterize the responses of thousands of voxels in retinotopically organized human cortex. First, we found that the response modulations of voxel RFs (vRFs) depend on the spatial relationship between the RF center and the visual location of the attended target. Second, we used two analyses to assess the spatial encoding quality of a population of voxels. We found that attention increased fine spatial discriminability and representational fidelity near the attended target. Third, we linked these findings by manipulating the observed vRF attentional modulations and recomputing our measures of the fidelity of population codes. Surprisingly, we discovered that attentional enhancements of population-level representations largely depend on position shifts of vRFs, rather than changes in size or gain. Our data suggest that position shifts of single RFs are a principal mechanism by which attention enhances population-level representations in visual cortex.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although changes in the gain and size of RFs have dominated our view of how attention modulates visual information codes, such hypotheses have largely relied on the extrapolation of single-cell responses to population responses. Here we use fMRI to relate changes in single voxel receptive fields (vRFs) to changes in population-level representations. We find that vRF position shifts contribute more to population-level enhancements of visual information than changes in vRF size or gain. This finding suggests that position shifts are a principal mechanism by which spatial attention enhances population codes for relevant visual information. This poses challenges for labeled line theories of information processing, suggesting that downstream regions likely rely on distributed inputs rather than single neuron-to-neuron mappings.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/373386-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; encoding models; labeled lines; population codes; receptive fields; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242794      PMCID: PMC5373124          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A new method for estimating population receptive field topography in visual cortex.

Authors:  Sangkyun Lee; Amalia Papanikolaou; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis; Georgios A Keliris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The relationship between cortical magnification factor and population receptive field size in human visual cortex: constancies in cortical architecture.

Authors:  Ben M Harvey; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual psychology?

Authors:  H B Barlow
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 7.  Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 9.  Computational advances towards linking BOLD and behavior.

Authors:  John T Serences; Sameer Saproo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  A continuous semantic space describes the representation of thousands of object and action categories across the human brain.

Authors:  Alexander G Huth; Shinji Nishimoto; An T Vu; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  21 in total

1.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; William Thyer; Janna W Wennberg; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Attention alters spatial resolution by modulating second-order processing.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Flexible top-down modulation in human ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Ru-Yuan Zhang; Kendrick Kay
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Relative precision of top-down attentional modulations is lower in early visual cortex compared to mid- and high-level visual areas.

Authors:  Sunyoung Park; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Normalizing population receptive fields.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; Sam Ling
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spatial Attention Enhances Crowded Stimulus Encoding Across Modeled Receptive Fields by Increasing Redundancy of Feature Representations.

Authors:  Justin D Theiss; Joel D Bowen; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Dissociable signatures of visual salience and behavioral relevance across attentional priority maps in human cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Vy A Vo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The what, where and how of delay activity.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.