Literature DB >> 35020526

Relative precision of top-down attentional modulations is lower in early visual cortex compared to mid- and high-level visual areas.

Sunyoung Park1, John T Serences1,2.   

Abstract

Top-down spatial attention enhances cortical representations of behaviorally relevant visual information and increases the precision of perceptual reports. However, little is known about the relative precision of top-down attentional modulations in different visual areas, especially compared with the highly precise stimulus-driven responses that are observed in early visual cortex. For example, the precision of attentional modulations in early visual areas may be limited by the relatively coarse spatial selectivity and the anatomical connectivity of the areas in prefrontal cortex that generate and relay the top-down signals. Here, we used functional MRI (fMRI) and human participants to assess the precision of bottom-up spatial representations evoked by high-contrast stimuli across the visual hierarchy. Then, we examined the relative precision of top-down attentional modulations in the absence of spatially specific bottom-up drive. Whereas V1 showed the largest relative difference between the precision of top-down attentional modulations and the precision of bottom-up modulations, midlevel areas such as V4 showed relatively smaller differences between the precision of top-down and bottom-up modulations. Overall, this interaction between visual areas (e.g., V1 vs. V4) and the relative precision of top-down and bottom-up modulations suggests that the precision of top-down attentional modulations is limited by the representational fidelity of areas that generate and relay top-down feedback signals.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When the relative precision of purely top-down and bottom-up signals were compared across visual areas, early visual areas like V1 showed higher bottom-up precision compared with top-down precision. In contrast, midlevel areas showed similar levels of top-down and bottom-up precision. This result suggests that the precision of top-down attentional modulations may be limited by the relatively coarse spatial selectivity and the anatomical connectivity of the areas generating and relaying the signals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; spatial attention; top-down feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35020526      PMCID: PMC8836715          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00300.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  94 in total

1.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention.

Authors:  J A Brefczynski; E A DeYoe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; T Pasternak; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Temporal autocorrelation in univariate linear modeling of FMRI data.

Authors:  M W Woolrich; B D Ripley; M Brady; S M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  John T Serences; Steven Yantis; Andrew Culberson; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Topography of projections to posterior cortical areas from the macaque frontal eye fields.

Authors:  G B Stanton; C J Bruce; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1995-03-06       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Prior expectations evoke stimulus templates in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Michel F Failing; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M I Sereno; A M Dale; J B Reppas; K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; T J Brady; B R Rosen; R B Tootell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Imagery of a moving object: the role of occipital cortex and human MT/V5+.

Authors:  Amanda Kaas; Sarah Weigelt; Alard Roebroeck; Axel Kohler; Lars Muckli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Visual topography of human intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Jascha D Swisher; Mark A Halko; Lotfi B Merabet; Stephanie A McMains; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.