Literature DB >> 23684878

A new method for estimating population receptive field topography in visual cortex.

Sangkyun Lee1, Amalia Papanikolaou2, Nikos K Logothetis3, Stelios M Smirnakis4, Georgios A Keliris5.   

Abstract

We introduce a new method for measuring visual population receptive fields (pRF) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The pRF structure is modeled as a set of weights that can be estimated by solving a linear model that predicts the Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) signal using the stimulus protocol and the canonical hemodynamic response function. This method does not make a priori assumptions about the specific pRF shape and is therefore a useful tool for uncovering the underlying pRF structure at different spatial locations in an unbiased way. We show that our method is more accurate than a previously described method (Dumoulin and Wandell, 2008) which directly fits a 2-dimensional isotropic Gaussian pRF model to predict the fMRI time-series. We demonstrate that direct-fit models do not fully capture the actual pRF shape, and can be prone to pRF center mislocalization when the pRF is located near the border of the stimulus space. A quantitative comparison demonstrates that our method outperforms the direct-fit methods in the pRF center modeling by achieving higher explained variance of the BOLD signal. This was true for direct-fit isotropic Gaussian, anisotropic Gaussian, and difference of isotropic Gaussians model. Importantly, our model is also capable of exploring a variety of pRF properties such as surround suppression, receptive field center elongation, orientation, location and size. Additionally, the proposed method is particularly attractive for monitoring pRF properties in the visual areas of subjects with lesions of the visual pathways, where it is difficult to anticipate what shape the reorganized pRF might take. Finally, the method proposed here is more efficient in computation time than direct-fit methods, which need to search for a set of parameters in an extremely large searching space. Instead, this method uses the pRF topography to constrain the space that needs to be searched for the subsequent modeling.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Population receptive field; Retinotopic mapping; Visual field mapping; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23684878     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  22 in total

1.  Organization of area hV5/MT+ in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Authors:  Amalia Papanikolaou; Georgios A Keliris; T Dorina Papageorgiou; Ulrich Schiefer; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Increased functional connectivity between superior colliculus and brain regions implicated in bodily self-consciousness during the rubber hand illusion.

Authors:  Isadora Olivé; Claus Tempelmann; Alain Berthoz; Hans-Joachim Heinze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Hemisphere-dependent attentional modulation of human parietal visual field representations.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Topographical estimation of visual population receptive fields by FMRI.

Authors:  Sangkyun Lee; Amalia Papanikolaou; Georgios A Keliris; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Spatial elongation of population receptive field profiles revealed by model-free fMRI back-projection.

Authors:  Christian Merkel; Jens-Max Hopf; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Radial bias is not necessary for orientation decoding.

Authors:  Michael S Pratte; Jocelyn L Sy; Jascha D Swisher; Frank Tong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The Human Connectome Project 7 Tesla retinotopy dataset: Description and population receptive field analysis.

Authors:  Noah C Benson; Keith W Jamison; Michael J Arcaro; An T Vu; Matthew F Glasser; Timothy S Coalson; David C Van Essen; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil; Jonathan Winawer; Kendrick Kay
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.