Literature DB >> 31127004

Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Sirawaj Itthipuripat1,2,3,4, Thomas C Sprague1,5, John T Serences6,7,8.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) are two noninvasive methods commonly used to study neural mechanisms supporting visual attention in humans. Studies using these tools, which have complementary spatial and temporal resolutions, implicitly assume they index similar underlying neural modulations related to external stimulus and internal attentional manipulations. Accordingly, they are often used interchangeably for constraining understanding about the impact of bottom-up and top-down factors on neural modulations. To test this core assumption, we simultaneously manipulated bottom-up sensory inputs by varying stimulus contrast and top-down cognitive modulations by changing the focus of spatial attention. Each of the male and female subjects participated in both fMRI and EEG sessions performing the same experimental paradigm. We found categorically different patterns of attentional modulation on fMRI activity in early visual cortex and early stimulus-evoked potentials measured via EEG (e.g., the P1 component and steady-state visually-evoked potentials): fMRI activation scaled additively with attention, whereas evoked EEG components scaled multiplicatively with attention. However, across longer time scales, a contralateral negative-going potential and oscillatory EEG signals in the alpha band revealed additive attentional modulation patterns like those observed with fMRI. These results challenge prior assumptions that fMRI and early stimulus-evoked potentials measured with EEG can be interchangeably used to index the same neural mechanisms of attentional modulations at different spatiotemporal scales. Instead, fMRI measures of attentional modulations are more closely linked with later EEG components and alpha-band oscillations. Considered together, hemodynamic and electrophysiological signals can jointly constrain understanding of the neural mechanisms supporting cognition.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT fMRI and EEG have been used as tools to measure the location and timing of attentional modulations in visual cortex and are often used interchangeably for constraining computational models under the assumption that they index similar underlying neural processes. However, by varying attentional and stimulus parameters, we found differential patterns of attentional modulations of fMRI activity in early visual cortex and commonly used stimulus-evoked potentials measured via EEG. Instead, across longer time scales, a contralateral negative-going potential and EEG oscillations in the alpha band exhibited attentional modulations similar to those observed with fMRI. Together, these results suggest that different physiological processes assayed by these complementary techniques must be jointly considered when making inferences about the neural underpinnings of cognitive operations.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; attention; contrast response functions; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31127004      PMCID: PMC6668200          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2519-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  132 in total

1.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas.

Authors:  A Martínez; F Di Russo; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; R B Buxton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective visual attention.

Authors:  P Fries; J H Reynolds; A E Rorie; R Desimone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex.

Authors:  S P Gandhi; D J Heeger; G M Boynton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.

Authors:  S Kastner; M A Pinsk; P De Weerd; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; T Pasternak; R Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; J Pauls; M Augath; T Trinath; A Oeltermann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Neuronal basis of contrast discrimination.

Authors:  G M Boynton; J B Demb; G H Glover; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  15 in total

1.  Covert Attention Increases the Gain of Stimulus-Evoked Population Codes.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; William Thyer; Janna W Wennberg; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Awareness-Dependent Normalization Framework of Visual Bottom-up Attention.

Authors:  Shiyu Wang; Ling Huang; Qinglin Chen; Jingyi Wang; Siting Xu; Xilin Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Feature-based attention multiplicatively scales the fMRI-BOLD contrast-response function.

Authors:  Joshua J Foster; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.709

4.  Investigating mechanisms of fast BOLD responses: The effects of stimulus intensity and of spatial heterogeneity of hemodynamics.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Gary H Glover; Nina E Fultz; Bruce R Rosen; Jonathan R Polimeni; Laura D Lewis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 7.400

5.  Saturating Nonlinearities of Contrast Response in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Louis N Vinke; Ilona M Bloem; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Stimulus visibility and uncertainty mediate the influence of attention on response bias and visual contrast appearance.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kai-Yu Chang; Ashley Bong; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Neurobiological changes during the peripartum period: implications for health and behavior.

Authors:  Emilia F Cárdenas; Autumn Kujawa; Kathryn L Humphreys
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  α-Band activity tracks a two-dimensional spotlight of attention during spatial working memory maintenance.

Authors:  David W Sutterer; Sean M Polyn; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Thomas C Sprague; Aspen H Yoo; Wei Ji Ma; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Understanding Neural Oscillations in the Human Brain: From Movement to Consciousness and Vice Versa.

Authors:  Ana Maria Cebolla; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.