Literature DB >> 29971349

Attention alters spatial resolution by modulating second-order processing.

Michael Jigo1, Marisa Carrasco2.   

Abstract

Endogenous and exogenous visuospatial attention both alter spatial resolution, but they operate via distinct mechanisms. In texture segmentation tasks, exogenous attention inflexibly increases resolution even when detrimental for the task at hand and does so by modulating second-order processing. Endogenous attention is more flexible and modulates resolution to benefit performance according to task demands, but it is unknown whether it also operates at the second-order level. To answer this question, we measured performance on a second-order texture segmentation task while independently manipulating endogenous and exogenous attention. Observers discriminated a second-order texture target at several eccentricities. We found that endogenous attention improved performance uniformly across eccentricity, suggesting a flexible mechanism that can increase or decrease resolution based on task demands. In contrast, exogenous attention improved performance in the periphery but impaired it at central retinal locations, consistent with an inflexible resolution enhancement. Our results reveal that endogenous and exogenous attention both alter spatial resolution by differentially modulating second-order processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29971349      PMCID: PMC6028983          DOI: 10.1167/18.7.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  59 in total

1.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

2.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Human primary visual cortex (V1) is selective for second-order spatial frequency.

Authors:  Luke E Hallum; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception.

Authors:  C Chubb; G Sperling
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Textures as Probes of Visual Processing.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor; Mary M Conte; Charles F Chubb
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.422

6.  Organization of texture segregation processing in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  V A Lamme; B W van Dijk; H Spekereijse
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Striate cortex extracts higher-order spatial correlations from visual textures.

Authors:  K P Purpura; J D Victor; E Katz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect.

Authors:  M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Attraction of position preference by spatial attention throughout human visual cortex.

Authors:  Barrie P Klein; Ben M Harvey; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs.

Authors:  Daniël Lakens
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-26
View more
  9 in total

1.  In search of exogenous feature-based attention.

Authors:  Ian Donovan; Ying Joey Zhou; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Differential Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Attention on Sensory Tuning.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Sara Okun; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  How exogenous spatial attention affects visual representation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Hsin-Hung Li; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  An image-computable model of how endogenous and exogenous attention differentially alter visual perception.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Voluntary attention improves performance similarly around the visual field.

Authors:  Simran Purokayastha; Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 6.  To look or not to look: dissociating presaccadic and covert spatial attention.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Nina M Hanning; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 16.978

7.  Asymmetries in visual acuity around the visual field.

Authors:  Antoine Barbot; Shutian Xue; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Differential impact of endogenous and exogenous attention on activity in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Elisha P Merriam; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Differential impact of exogenous and endogenous attention on the contrast sensitivity function across eccentricity.

Authors:  Michael Jigo; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.